Jonathan Chait wrote over 6,000 words complaining that progressives (like me) make things too hard for Biden while Columbusing black moderates and begging Manchin to give them what they want.
And yet he somehow matters to NEVER MENTION voting rights.
But, this is what these people do. They want to marginalize the calls for justice and fairness, paint reform as some progressive hobgoblin, but claim they're tacking towards a (non-existent) center where Black people don't get to vote but are QUIET and happy about it.
The full list of my big, scary, UNCOMPROMISING position are:
* A world where cops CANNOT shoot my Black children and get away with it
* AT LEAST 1965 LEVELS OF VOTING RIGHTS
* NO BEATINGS or other inhumane treatment of immigrants
* AT LEAST 1973 LEVELS OF ABORTION RIGHTS
Again, in over 6,000 words, Chait addresses none of them. People like him, people who AREN'T under constant threat of these things being taken away from them, NEVER DO.
They're willing to "compromise" because they things they're willing to trade never affect them.
Whatever, if you think people like me, and my desire to have the rights that are allegedly guaranteed to me in the Constitution are the problem, and NOT the people who want to take those rights away from me, you'll never get it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’m not sure what people want Biden to say. We’re on the “not” vigilante justice team.
Besides, Biden has his chance to address this with his pick for AG, he picked Garland, Garland didn’t do bugger all about *the cop* who shot the dude in the back.
That’s the problem.
Meanwhile, half of the people out here gave Harris blowback for being a prosecutor, what the hell do people want now, for her to be MORE prosecutorial and say “screw this double jeopardy, we ride at dawn.”???
Sometimes, the bad guys win. If you’re mad about that, FIX THE SYSTEM.
But to do that folks need to hold the thought in their head for MORE THAN TWO WEEKS.
I could write about fixing the courts a month from now and most people will tell me to go get f***ed w/o Machinema.
I am now listening to white people Columbus the right of self-defense... as if it's EVER BEEN A QUESTION whether violent white people have the right to shoot people they don't like.
FUCKING HOBBES defends the right of self-defense EVEN WHEN THE STATE TRIES TO KILL YOU
The question was never "do white people have a right to self defense" the question was always "do white people have the right to self defense after they show up with a gun looking to shoot someone."
And, not surprisingly, a bunch of white people are like "sure, why not?"
If more people in mainstream media or financial media played video games, @Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick would be under so much pressure to resign there'd be a countdown clock on @CNBC.
This man:
* Lied about what he knew about sexual harassment at his company, *to his board*, about things that would result in massive lawsuits against the company.
* Left a voice mail threatening to have his female assistant killed (which he's admitted to)
* Promoted a woman to "co-leader" of Blizzard, only to have her leave *3 months* later citing "tokenism" and unfair pay.
* Made a different woman at the company send out an email defending the company, *that he wrote* and then said the email was in bad taste once it went bad
The extent to which Democrats have lost the midterms before the midterms have even started, because Democrats did not restore the Voting Rights Act, fix the Census, or do anything about gerrymandering, is underreported somehow.
Like, we can "debate" on stupid Twitter about "Shor-ism" or CRT or whatever the hell else floats people's boats for a week. But this battle has largely been fought AND LOST without Democrats ever really taking the field.
What's wild is that people, otherwise serious and knowledgeable people, will be gearing up to have "takes" on how the midterms were a "referendum" on some thing or another.
IT'S A REFERENDUM ON MAP MAKING. And the GOP WON. A WHILE AGO.
The rest is shouting.
In the meantime, Mark Meadows (who was allegedly cooperating) decided to skip out on his deposition, so I supposed we're, what, a month now from him being indicted too?
*Now* we can play the game I explained a month ago:
"A criminal contempt proceeding is essentially a prosecution for noncompliance with the law. It doesn’t really exist to make witnesses testify but to punish people who do not. It’s a criminal proceeding, just like any other"...
"The defendant is entitled to a fair jury trial and an appeals process. The whole thing could take years, even if Bannon is found guilty of criminal contempt. Which itself is not a sure thing: The last official who was indicted for criminal contempt was acquitted."
People who care about civil rights and civil liberties would be demanding that Rusten Sheskey, the police officer who shot Jacob Blake six times in the back, be brought to justice.
People like Glenn are demanding that white boys get away with murder.
If you, like Glenn, find a whole lot of energy to try to free Rittenhouse, but can't find that same gear to hold cops accountable, I'm allowed to assume that you, like Glenn, are in it for the permissiveness of white violence, and not criminal justice reform.