Thread by @TheUfoJoe

1 Eric Davis responding to @EricRWeinstein

(Davis' response is paraphrased since that FB group has requested no direct quotes)

@wotzitt wrote: Mathematician Eric Weinstein (EW) commenting on Twitter about NASA chief Bill Nelson's recent statements about UFOs and ET life, said:

2 EW: "*If* we are being visited, it is likely not with conventional propulsion. It is insane that we are not talking about this as possible new physics. The conversation will go right back to technology, security, skeptism [sic] etc. I cannot understand what we are doing here.

3 EW: "The unwillingness to turn our own physical data over to our own scientists makes this whole thing sound to me like we are choosing to fake extraterrestrial visitation. That would be the main reason to think this is all a moronic psy-op. But why do that? It can't work in

4 EW: "the end. Sooner or later we are either going to be asking why our government faked this moronic story OR why they withheld our data from the people we needed to see it.

"This is not primarily a technology issue. It's either a propaganda/mind-control issue or a science

5 EW: "issue at this point.

"It makes zero sense. Give science our data. Now.
Anything but physical discussion of a physical phenomena."

* * *

6 And my paraphrase of Eric Davis' response:

Weinstein is clueless. The scientists who ARE interested in studying UAPs have already been given the data. The interest level among scientists isn't as extensive as Weinstein thinks because most of them don't believe UAPs exist.