Here’s a look at the sCiEnCe behind the covid vaccine. It’s a #$@!% joke.
2. The COVID vaccination campaign is the biggest medical fraud in modern history.
3. The “Operation Warp Speed” injections are dangerous and don’t work.
4. They are the deadliest ‘vaccines’ ever created.
5. They don’t stop transmission and are causing a ton of health issues.
6. The risk of developing heart problems are significantly increased in those who’ve received these fast-tracked vaccines.
7. The rushed vaccine experiment is a complete failure.
You're being lied to. Constantly. The long-term effects, are totally unknown.
Entire countries of people are guinea pigs in this tragic medical experiment. The vaccine companies have complete immunity. KNOWLEDGE is not only POWER but it could save you & your family’s life.
Most people don’t realize the politics of cancer therapy and the history of how vested interests have succeeded in influencing the medical profession & govt agencies & public opinion about cancer & the treatments that are available.
2. The full story of both the science & corruption are presented in the books & documentaries that are included in this thread so you can pursue your own investigation & get smart about cancer and the effective treatments that exist.
3. You will see that throughout history numerous cancer researchers have been rewarded for their discoveries with jail, being driven out of the country, loss of license, harassment & many other things.
@Anthrosunday@maewest52499669@JoeBenedett@realDonaldTrump 1. Try to keep up. My thread merely compiles 50 years of climate “science”. With links to veritfy. From the scientists themselves. It’s what THEY’VE said. Not me. All i did was compile it all.
For ex: The IPCC report that led to the KyotoProtocol was altered AFTER peer review to remove the comments about doubts w/which scientists had re global warming. wsj.com/articles/SB834…
@Anthrosunday@maewest52499669@JoeBenedett@realDonaldTrump The scientific statements omitted:
1)“None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases.”
2)“No study to date has positively attributed all or part of the climate change to man–made causes”
@Souxieq2@BreakingNLive Signatories to the KyotoProtocol bought into the cap &trade concept in 2005 and now big CO2 is bigger than "big oil."
@Souxieq2@BreakingNLive What’s even more ridiculous is that the UN IPCC report that led to the Kyoto Protocol was altered AFTER peer review to remove the comments about doubts w/which scientists had regarding global warming claims. wsj.com/articles/SB834…
@Souxieq2@BreakingNLive CO2 was pretty steady when the Roman warm period, the cooler Dark Ages, Ice-Age, Little Ice Age and Medieval Warm Period happened, all natural climatic changes that far exceeds today's changes.
@Souxieq2@BreakingNLive If there was approx 25% less CO2 in the atmosphere than there is now w/ temps throughout much of the world just as high (or higher) during those warm periods as they are now then there is nothing unnatural, unusual, or unprecedented about the current level of Earth’s warmth.
@Souxieq2@BreakingNLive FYI: Climatology/genetics/geology as well as many other scienctific fields owe their existence to govt research grants. Most scientists cant put food on their table w/o receiving grant money to conduct their research.
@the_insiderUKG Climatology/geology/genetics as well as many other scienctific fields owe their existence to govt research grants. Most scientists cant put food on their table w/o receiving grant money to conduct their research.
@the_insiderUKG When your existence depends on support from govts, it’s in your interest to conduct research in a way that supports the continuation of research in your chosen field.
Grants are awarded based on likelihood that a particular researcher will find evidence that supports a hypothesis
@the_insiderUKG The reality is that research grants are awarded based on likelihood that a particular researcher's work will support a political agenda or sociological viewpoint. If your work supports an agenda favored by those who control the $$$, you will continue receiving research grants.