I'm relieved to see that the Mass Effect/Amazon deal is for a potential TV series and not a movie. Even so, the possibility (and likewise for Dragon Age) makes me cringe just a little, unlike many fans who appear... excited?
Let me explain. (Thread)
For starters, ME and DA have a custom protagonist. Meaning said TV show will need to pick whether said protagonist will be male or female. Boom, right off the bat you've just alienated a whole bunch of the built-in fan base who had their hopes up.
Secondly, those protagonists are designed to be a bit of a blank slate, one that the player fills out with their decisions. That's not going to work for a passive medium. So, suddenly, the protagonist will have their own personality... and their own *story*. That will be weird.
You think I'm wrong? Consider just how MUCH of the story is off-loaded onto the companions. They are the cyphers through which the player gets most of their emotional engagement from. On their own, the DA and ME protagonists are... well, pretty boring. That's not going to fly.
And think of those companions. Think of how MUCH the fanbase is attached to them. Now consider the fact that there is no way in hell any single story could encompass them all equally. Think of the howls of rage when companion X is relegated to a cameo... or not there at all.
Having a TV show instead of a movie allows for more companion options, sure, but consider your own playthrough: only a handful of them had any meaningful presence in a single game. That will need to be the case for this story, to maintain coherence. A few companions, one romance.
And that's IF the TV show makers consider the companions to be all that important. They might toss most of them aside in favor of the PLOT. In my mind, that would be a mistake. Both ME's and DA's plots were, at best, serviceable.
And I don't mean that in a derogatory way.
Those plots had to take into account the player's agency. They were kind of the shell upon which that player's emotional engagement was delivered -- usually through the companions and the choices themselves. Choice heightened engagement. Interactivity was the star, not the plot.
Take all that out, lose most of the companions, and you potentially end up with... a pretty run-of-the-mill fantasy or science-fiction show, one where a lot of the built-in audience has possibly been turned into outraged, howling malcontents before it's even released.
All that is, of course, if the DA or ME series is mishandled. I can think of any number of ways it could be done better... but that involves doing more than a strict adaptation, and that comes with its own complications.
Anyhow, good luck to the showrunners. They'll need it!
EDIT:
I'm seeing responses along the lines of "they could do some story within the DA/ME universe and not just the story of the games" -- that IS what I meant by an adaptation in my last tweet above. In many ways, not simply adapting the story of the games would be wiser.
BUT
BUT consider this from the perspective of those making the TV show. They are not making it solely for the fans, those who already know the entire story and would be fine with moving onto something else.
The far larger audience are those who know nothing about ME or DA at all.
At some level, this TV series needs to answer the question "what IS Mass Effect?" ...and that means making something that is *recognizeably* Mass Effect. It means retreading ground in a way that fans don't need, and will likely react poorly to.
Maybe. I guess we'll see.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Australian & NZ dev communities are small, lovely, and protective of each other. In the short time I've been part of it, I've quietly heard plenty about what Jennifer has done - and personally watched her drive one talented young man out of the industry entirely.
The difficulty then, as now, is that Jennifer positioned herself publicly as not only a figure of influence but also a marginalized voice who is - by all appearances - on the side of woman in games. Challenging that, especially as a guy, was unthinkable. Yet... here we are.
The fact that Jennifer weaponized her own victimhood could end up damaging the position of every other female and minority dev who are all already trying so goddamn hard... it's disgusting. I demand the @IGDA take note and take action.
"If you could Zack Snyder DA2, what would you change?"
Wow. I'm willing to bet Mark or Mike (or anyone else on the team) would give very different answers than me, but it's enough to give a sober man pause, because that was THE Project of Multiple Regrets.
I mean, it's the most hypothetical of hypotheticals. It's never gonna happen. I wouldn't be surprised if EA considered DA2 its embarrassing red-headed stepchild. We'd also need to ignore that in many ways DA2 was as good as it was bad BECAUSE of how it was made.
But that aside?
First, either restore the progressive changes to Kirkwall we'd planned over the passing of in-game years or reduce the time between acts to months instead of years... which, in hindsight, probably should have been done as soon as the progressive stuff was cut.
May as well make this its own thread. First, the Laws of Naming Things, written after many long years during which naming *anything* in the game was the most contentious thing the team could ever do.
Example 1: "Qunari". At first, everyone hated it. "It sounds too much like canary". "The Qun is way too difficult to pronounce." Etc. etc. 6 months later, no-one wanted to change it. That's what they were called... what else could they be?
Example 2: The DA world was not supposed to be called "Thedas". That was a temp name: "THE/DA/Setting". But we left it too long, and when we sat down to give it a proper name... nothing else sounded right. In our minds, the name had stuck.
I was going to write up my coming out story for #NationalComingOutDay, but then I thought... wow, this story is really irrelevant now, isn't it? (thread inc)
By irrelevant I mean... well, when I was growing up, there were no examples of gay anything I could look to. Did you know that Liberace and even Boy George were initially thought to be straight? Eccentric, sure, but straight. Being gay was simply... 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑡.
I remember a TV special called "An Early Frost" that came on TV when I was a teenager. It was about AIDS. Everything that I first heard that related to gayness which wasn't about 𝑠𝑒𝑥 was about AIDS. Gay sex meant death, and to many... we deserved it.
Preston Watamaniuk, the CD on Anthem, once told a frustrated Producer that the Writer tasks couldn’t be scheduled as rigorously as he wanted because “Writing is like Jazz”.
I’ve held onto that phrase ever since.
Now, before any other Producers (or backseat Producers) clutch their pearls, I *don’t* mean “Writers can’t be scheduled”. Of course they can. Don’t be silly.
What it means is that, when it comes to creative tasks, velocities can vary. You must take into account factors like inspiration, “juice”, and the need for iteration to achieve a vague definition of quality.
Look. If your first response to millions of women telling us they're afraid of and systemically oppressed by men is to worry at how all this talk will negatively impact "the good ones"...
...you're probably not one of "the good ones".
"Oh, you're just virtue signalling," sneers Skippy the Masculine Wonder.
Look, Skippy. The bar is pretty low right now. Considering how many men aggressively signal their boorishness, never mind anything approaching "virtue", let's not pretend to worry about sincerity just yet.
And, yes, I am sub-tweeting Skippy, someone I know IRL. Deal with it, Skippy.