Ten years ago I was saying that lecturers should not accept the commercialization of universities. But they were bribed into silence with payments from parallel programs. So the collapse of universities was inevitable.
In the Kibaki years, universities accepted that they could make money instead of relying on the exchequer. That small acceptance is like the story of the camel that asked the tent owner to cover his head, then cover the neck, then eventually the camel took over the tent.
The problem commercializing universities is that 1) lecturers suck at business 2) the university starts spending on administrative fluff. This principle was explained by Graeber: the more you adopt market forces, the more admin and bullshit jobs increase.
Accepting the neoliberal pact meant that VCs started to behave as CEOs. They needed a crowd of PAs, secretaries, body guards and limosines. Unis paid the cons called business consultants to tell them how to streamline university operations. Money was spent on ISO certification.
The desperation for more paying students led to the arms race where universities would capture TVET colleges to avoid the work of building campuses from scratch. They took huge loans for infrustructure and their administrative staff increased to more than the teaching one.
Unis then had to spend money on marketing departments to attract students. In the first half of the previous decade, universities as a cohort were the second largest advertising revenue for Kenyan media houses. That's why you never saw media report saying what I'm telling you.
Let me use marketing as an example of extra expense.
Universities are supposed to make their names known by 1) their graduates 2) their professors. So theyre supposed to hire professors based on the research and public profile best demonstrates the rigor and output of the uni.
In other words, the university markets itself through its own work. Think: did people like Okoth Okombo, Bethwell Ogot or Maria Nzomo need to advertise? You just read them, saw them and felt their impact.
With marketing, the promotion went to people employed to do nothing else.
That means that a university has to employ an extra department with its own budget (many times larger than that of academic departments) for tshirts & promotional materials, paid advertisements etc. Faculty had to spend less time on teaching and research and more on marketing.
Lecturers found themselves with more paperwork to sign for the many admins implementing performance management and marketing strategies. The work was overwhelming and alot of it useless, but guess how the lecturers were bribed into silence.
🪅🎊Parallel programmes!🎉👏🏾
Parallel programmes were about, again, increasing number of paying students (universities know nothing else). To teach more students, the universities paid the lecturers as extra income on top of their salaries. That's where everything headed south.
Some of you may say: why not start an income generating project on the side?
That proposal has the same problem I'm talking about. First, you are now forcing people who should be teaching and doing research to do side hustles for the uni like bottling water and raising chicken.
Second, and this, many Kenyans forget.
Side hustles cost money. If, for example, we decide that chicken farming can make money, it means that the money for textbooks and field trips is going to buying chicken feed and other essentials, at least until the farm turns a profit.
And even if the chicken farms turns a profit, that money has to be ploughed back into the chicken farm if we want to expand it.
So really, the side hustle will spend more than give university money for research and learning.
The third effect is the famous one we all know.
Corruption.
Professors spending so much time doing ka-ching ka-ching, cutting deals with businesses, stray away from the core function of the university and forget what the money was supposed to be for.
Remember that lecturers have been bribed into silence by parallel programme payments. So they were not going to say anything as the universities deteriorated. They didn't research to see all the warning signs that are in the research from US, Australia and other Anglo scholars.
This model of running unis never going to be unsustainable. Universities have to be a public good. If lecturers serve the public through education and intellectual engagement, no govt would defund unis without suffering political backlash. But lecturers preferred fast cash.
Lecturers need a soul searching. Get new @UASU_KE leaders. Relearn public good. The economics departments should ask Ndii or Kwame Owino how to read GoK economic data, and then tell us how money for presidential globe trotting and other silliness can pay for public education.
Any attempt to make lecturers both teachers and side hustlers ends up being more expensive than generating money, and then actual education suffers.
As Kenyans, we also need to stop glorifying the hustle. We hustle because the economy is bad. Not because we're entrepreneurs.
Also, THE MEDIA IS NOT OUR FRIEND. This whole mess was also possible because the media kept spreading propaganda about unis and we never stood up to it. It was media that celebrated the new campuses and frivolous new degrees because they were earning money from the advertising.
So universities are collapsing today because they were corrupted from within, and slowly the rot spread. Media benefitted. VC's and administrative staff benefitted. Business consultancies, lecturers benefitted. People just treated universities as a never ending money resource.
Nobody cared that university cultures were deteriorating and students were not getting the robust, intellectual engagement they deserved, to become creative and innovative. The media kept pounding with the useless story of graduates, to deflect attention from the real culprit.
The collapse of the universities is a collapse of the soul.
Hours of discussion on this mess are available at #MaishaKazini.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I hope we realize that there's a constant theme here. Whether we're talking of children in schools, extra judicial killings or rape, even Miguna's illegal explusion...the constant theme is Kenyans blaming the victims for violence.
So when do brutalizing teachers, rogue cops, rapists or officials disobeying court orders ever become responsible and accountable for their actions? What are we saying about them? That they are sadists, because the sadist blames the victim for the violence the sadist inflicts.
Kenya has a sadistic culture of glorifying cruelty because we support power at any cost, even at the cost of the victim. That's the essence of colonialism - the justification of power and the condemnation of victims.
I'm up looking at materials on the origins of competence based approaches (CBAs).
The more I read, the more I get shocked. I thought I had seen it all.
CBAs have been pushed by @OECD on virtually all countries on behalf of international business interests. #CBCMustfall
OECD created a competency arms race in Europe. It used PISA rankings to tell European countries how badly their education systems were, and then European politicians, without thinking, used those rankings to scare their populations into accepting CBAs. #cbcmustfall
Basically, it's psyops that operates like a bandwagon fallacy: 1. Rank country education systems, 2. Politicians panic that their country is not no 1 3. They ask "what should we do to be no 1" 3. Poof! Give them competency based approach! #CBCmustfalloecd.org/pisa/
A headline like this makes me understand why Kenyans have switched off politics.
It just doesn't make sense. Just when you think these guys are supposed to be competing on their agendas they are all lovey dovey with each other. the-star.co.ke/news/2021-11-1…
And this is how the ruling class forces us to tribalize politics. Because if they all sound the same, attend the same meetings, what's the difference between them other than their ethnicity?
Even the individual identities of these politicians are not different. What they call political campaigning is simply smile, dance and crack jokes and go home.
That's why I've been saying that ethnicized politics are structural in Kenya. It's not a choice.
But I also would like to point out the violence with which this story was drawn to my attention. I had not heard of the story, but this tweep drew it to my attention by suggesting that I had not said a thing because the violence was not perpetrated by a man.
The tweep was gloating, using the tone of "aha! I caught you being a hypocrite." The possibility that I had not seen the story, rather than that I saw it and chose to keep quiet, did not occur to this tweep.
Congolese teachers have been on strike, and the children decided to show solidarity and walk to parliament and demand that politicians address their teachers plight.
BBC drowned that story in a lecture by the politician that kids should be in school or at home. Aka contained.
The kids were in Parliament, but the politicians told them they were on the street. In other words, young people cannot take any political action is the equivalent of being on the streets.
@Njeriwaridi They've accepted to be kaliwad by rich boys with old money and don't like it when women don't do the same. Remember the report of a town in Nyandarua (I think) with an epidemic of male suicides? Did men mobilize to speak up? No. But they do when a woman is killed by her partner.
@Njeriwaridi Look at how these rich old men show young men the finger every day. Atwoli snr, no ideas, flaunts around his stupidity, money and wives on JKL, while a young man with energy and brilliant ideas can't get a job and doesn't know if he'll get married. Or is shot dead by police.
@Njeriwaridi Then another one paralyzes a young man and uses money to sanitize himself.
All that's a big eff you to young men.
But the rich men give them one outlet. Women. If the men take out their frustrations on women, the police won't intervene, State House and politicians keep quiet.