This company gets no recognition as its not owned by some of the funds that lead to cult like status for some companies. They are probably one of the most disruptive companies in biotech.
1/ I think $SANA could be taking on all the things the CRISPR companies are doing ex-vivo and doing it in-vivo. They are combining 3 of the most powerful technologies in the market today with Fusogen, CRISPR and iPSC.
2/ The fact that this company is only at $3 billion market cap when they are at $5 to $10 billion is a gift for the retail investors. They could be bigger then all the CRISPR companies combined.
3/ Let us take a look at the pipeline, the science and the potential. I have to reign in my excitement a bit because I could lay out a case for this being the one company that hits $1 trillion market cap in biotech.
4/ They have 2 parts to their pipeline. The first half is using the Fusogen delivery technology to do in-vivo cell editing in T cells, liver and stem cells. The other half is about creating hypoimmune iPSC cells.
5/ Fusogen is a virus like particle. It takes the best of all things we know about viral delivery and combines it with LNP. This is a particle structure based of paramyxovirus which is in the 13kb to 19kb size. Big enough to carry any genetic payload.
6/ It combines that with a cell targeting ligand and a fusion protein that allows cell entry. This can target liver cells, T cells and even stem cells. They could take and edit stem cells inside the patient to fix SCD instead of the complex ex-vivo process of other companies.
7/ They are working first on doing in-vivo CAR-T therapies. This would be faster and safer for patients by using the patients own T cells in a safe and easy IV.
8/ Now this process does have its limits as they can only do the insertion of the CAR and not a bunch of different edits. This is autologous in-vivo CAR-T therapy which is revolutionary and validates the technology.
9/ This Fusogen vector can be used to delivery any gene editor or therapy into the liver or stem cells. With the right editing technology they could do everything every CRISPR company could do and do it in-vivo like fix stem cells for SCD.
10/ Just with these fusogen programs around CAR-T, Liver and Stem cells, it could be worth over $5 billion in long term revenues. There are hundreds of diseases from cancer to stem cells they could take on.
11/ The other half of their technology is about creating cell therapies that are completely invisible to the immune system. They have had tons of success transplanting these cells into NHP with fantastic results.
12/ The hypoimmune system takes the iPSC and knocks out the HLA-I, HLA-2 and upregulated CD47. This overcomes the T cells, NK cells and Macrophages.
13/ They can take those hypoimmune iPSC cells and then take them into anything they desire from T cells to islet cells to heart cells and to glial cells in the brain.
14/ They already have some very impressive mouse data for these cells in diabetes and repairing myelin in MS mice. The potential of these cells is in the tens of billions of dollars. They could cure MS with these kinds of programs.
15/ I know $CRSP is using a capsule from Viacyte to insert islet cells into the body. This system avoids the immune system completely with hypoimmune islet cells. The mouse data is really good for this program.
16/ While everyone else is getting all excited about genomics and cute buzzwords, $SANA is really disrupting the biotech world. The fact that those people haven't discovered it yet, is a bonus to the rest of us.
17/ Obviously, I got to temper the enthusiasm since this is still in mouse and NHP studies. They should be moving into the clinic in 2022 for the in-vivo CAR-T. This won't be about having the best CAR-T program. It will be about proving they can edit in-vivo with fusogen delivery
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a concept I have seen investors ignore for my 25 years in the market. The market isn't always right, but usually it is. I learned that over the many years. I never discount what the market is trying to tell me.
1/ I made a lot of money over the years picking a few great companies long before anyone else ever knew who they were. That doesn't mean the market was wrong. Many times I see people load up on all these "cheap" companies.
2/ Those companies that are trading at $800 million or so when the rest of their peers are $3 to $10 billion. These companies aren't this cheap because the entirety of millions of investors around the world are clueless.
This has probably been the most bubbly space in biotech the past year. I dumped all these companies back in late January and only recently started buying any of them back.
I love the genomics space, but the cart is way ahead of the horse at this point. I think many of them are now down 50% or more from their highs as human behavior always goes from bubble to bust and back again. I still don't think any of these scream cheap yet.
The synthetic biology space is all about creating new biology. This is mostly around engineering yeast or bacteria to become tiny factories. This offers a sustainable resource for rare products.
I have:
$DNA 1.38%
$TWST 1.38%
$ARMS 2.06%
$CDXS .69%
This theme makes up 5.51% of my portfolio.
$DNA is the fan favorite for this space, but it also prices in a huge amount of success already. They focus on engineering microbes to be tiny factories to product products. They also engineer microbes for commercial products like probiotics.
I snagged back a starter position in $CRSP today. I had sold 90% of my position at $175 and the rest at $130. Today, I picked up a starter .69% position at $83.33. It might have lost its innovation for now, but it is the same tech and could do everything $NTLA can.
$ARK has been loading up on $NTLA which makes me want to avoid that like the plague as its just over priced and over hyped. I can take the bet on $CRSP for a fraction of that value. They will have a strong SCD program. I have low expectations for anything else.
I am betting they will get shift gears once they have SCD commercial and get on the ball with building their next great thing. Personally, I think they should scarf up $IPSC on the cheap for their cell therapies. Or at least do a license deal.
I heard Scott Wolchko say he thought that iPSC was the cell therapy manufacturing platform of the future. I completely agree with him. All cell therapies will move into this platform. These are my leaders in the space.
I have:
$FATE 1.38%
$SANA 2.07%
$CRBU 2.76%
$IPSC 2.76%
This theme makes up 8.96% of my portfolio.
$FATE is the clear leader and pioneer in iPSC cell therapies. Their recent R&D day revealed several new edits that continue to lead the science. They have multiple programs ongoing across all blood cancers with NK cells. They will be advancing to solid tumors.