4) was my size calculated BEFORE the trade, in accordance with my risk management system? or did I randomly estimate what size to use?
5) did I have a systematic ENTRY or did I get in at some random ass area due to FOMO?
Do this for EVERY trade u took that day. Then overtime,
you'll see where most of your losses or stubborn trades come from. Is it #1? #3 ? #5? which of those 5 points leads to 80% of your losses (Pareto Principle) ? is it entries? exits? size? trade selection? it's different for everyone since we're all stubborn in different ways.
For most traders, for every 10 mistakes we make, it's usually the same top 1-2 that make up the vast majority of our losses. So identify what those top 2 bad habits are, and purge them. Read my tweets on the pareto principle (80/20 rule) for more details.
1) Even tho i was profitable before that, I would say about 2 yrs.. mainly bc even during my "profitable" streaks i would still have the occasional full retard days that would wipe out months of gains. so i knew how to make 💵, but discipline wasnt there until 2yrs later.
2) depends. if u're talking lowfloats then of course, i NEVER ever short a lowfloat stock without digging into its filings & fundamentals first. Too much edge there not to, plus it saves me from getting trapped on "agenda plays" like freedom price setups or planned offerings etc
now if u're talking LCs or options then i do almost zero fundamental research b/c it's useless short term. most of the fundy info for LCs is already factored into price unlike lowfloats where a stock can have a fat ATM or dilution yet idiot chasers will still be clueless about it
The more I answer questions the more I realize how full of shit this industry is. the amount of scammers & "gurus" out there who lure beginners in w/ unstainable strategies that offer short term satisfaction but long term failure is astounding. They lure u in with shit like this
Meanwhile the reality is THIS.
and u guys are EATING this shit up like it's fucking cheesecake.
STOP falling for this BS.
Most of my time spent on DMs is literally me helping ppl UNLEARN the shitty habits they built up listening to fuck ass scammy gurus that blow up themselves but then refund with YOUR money
@_spikeet revolutionized the game for u mofos. check em out. and no im not paid to promote em. if anything im lowkey jealous that u guys can now access data in seconds, that used to take me MONTHS of all-nighters to collect & track MANUALLY. To put it in perspective:
@_spikeet My spreadsheets had 10-30+ columns per ticker (row) depending on what I was tracking.
then 100s to 1000s of rows , and each ticker took me 8 to 20 minutes to manually fill across, so about 10min per row.
Do the math.
Sometimes my friends would stay up all night with me to help
@_spikeet but that didnt last long b/c they got bored/burned out super quick lol Then at one point I tried to get my GF to help (especially with when I was creating the lowfloat Volume Forecast). But after 2 days she quit too lol. And i dont blame her, it was tedious & boring as FUCK.
That's precisely why I say that I never use basic S/R levels as areas to risk off. Read all my smart vs dumb money threads. big players are liquidity hunters. All they care about is getting easy fills (from retail's market orders), & stop losses are LITERALLY liquidity gold mines
and where to most ppl place their stops? around basic ass support/resistance levels & round numbers. That's why basic S/R levels actually fail WAY more than they hold. Ppl just have confirmation bias & only focus on the few times that they work, then say "sEe? iT rEjEcTeD hErE"
but for each time a S/R level worked, I can show u 39 other examples where it didnt. S/R is not enough UNLESS it overlaps with several other supply/demand indicators ( MAs, bagholder areas like volume profile or #vwapBoulevard , open interest clusters, mean reversion zones etc
When I say demand/supply zones i'm not JUST talking about basic technical analysis 101 support/resistance levels. Many things contribute to demand or supply and some of the most accurate ones are not even on the chart.
why do u think sometimes a stock will have ZERO obvious resistance but keep rejecting?? or a stock will have zero obvious support levels on the chart but keep holding dips everytime? stop thinking the chart has all the answers. we'd all be billionaires if it were that simple.
That's why I always say find a setup & master it. There is no universal indicator that works for all asset classes. something will work with a 80% winrate on setup ABC but have a 20% winrate on setup XYZ. some things that work like MAGIC on lowfloats dont work at all on LCs etc
Most ppl enter the trade first then place their stop a certain amount away from their entry. "i'll enter here and just risk X cents". That's wrong. Your stop loss should ALWAYS be protected by a key supply (if short) or demand (if long) area. That's the whole point of a stop loss
it has to be protected by an area that the stock is NOT likely to breach. If ur entry is too far away from such an area (thus fucking up ur R/R) then ignore the trade. That's why I always say exits come before entries. If i cant find a good area to risk off then fuck the trade
That's also why I want my stop to be protected by as many factors as possible. A basic ass support/resistance area is not enough. I need multiple safeguards. My stop loss is my quarterback. I want EVERYBODY protecting that mofo. throw in 2 tight ends & block the RB if we have to