It is indeed a striking feature of the American political discourse: In determining whether or not something counts as extravagant or aloof, the socio-economic dimension is almost entirely ignored - all that counts are the cultural sensibilities of conservative white people.
In that sense, the latest Kamala Harris “scandal” is not just a predictable bad-faith attack from the rightwing outrage machine; it’s also well in line with the established parameters of who gets derided as “arrogant elite” and who gets celebrated as “regular folks.”
The terms “blue collar” and “working class,” for instance, almost always refer to either a type of professional occupation or certain reactionary cultural sensibilities of white people - not class or socio-economic status.
Parading expensive tactical gear and weaponry in public? Must be “regular folks” demonstrating their love of freedom and frustration with the liberal elite-run Big Government infringing on their right to be left alone.
Interestingly, my impression is that the foregrounding of cultural and political sensibilities over class and status is more widely acknowledged when it comes to the term “redneck” - and not only since the rise of the Duck Dynasty madness.
Most people, I think, are well aware that the term “redneck” doesn’t / does no longer imply poor - you can absolutely be wealthy and well-educated, as long as you display certain reactionary political and cultural attitudes.
But when some dude can afford to invest in a collection of kevlar vests and all sorts of weaponry, this is seldom discussed as the extravagant lifestyle of white conservatives (as opposed to, say, liberal elites indulging in “luxury items” like e-bikes).
In that way, the conventions of political terminology are often entirely in line with the self-description of white conservatives - not coincidentally creating and perpetuating the idea of “regular folks” as a clearly racialized category of specific political valence.
This, of course, has been one specific version of the American promise since before the country was even founded: A nation in which white Christian men would get to define what counts as “American,” who does and who does not belong. It’s now the core promise of Trumpism.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Right off the bat, JDH claims that the culture wars have turned into “class culture wars”: America split into two camps, a progressive elite vs the conservative middle and working classes. This, however, completely obscures the actual fault lines of the political conflict. 2/
This idea of “class culture wars” misrepresents the political coalitions on either side of the conflict. First of all, it ignores how enormously important a wealthy reactionary elite is in funding and defining the conservative political project. 3/
Worth reflecting on why the enormous inconsistencies and outrageous contradictions between the various conspiracies and dogmas that are circulating on the Right aren’t perceived as a problem. The key, I believe, is to discern what rightwingers consider the “Higher Truth.”
Regardless of the topic: The specifics of this or that conspiracy theory don’t matter to rightwingers - what matters is what they see as the “Higher Truth”: That Democrats / Lefties / Liberals are out to destroy “real” America, and that they must be stopped.
Anything that conforms to this Higher Truth - and paints “Us” (the in-group) as the sole proponents and heroic defenders of “real” (read: white Christian patriarchal) America while demonizing “Them” (the out-group) as an Un-American enemy - is enthusiastically embraced.
Utterly bizarre. I wish we could just shrug this off as irrelevant. But this kind of deliberate distortion of the political landscape is quite common in mainstream media - and most people, I’m afraid, don’t consume this as “Stephens being Stephens,” but as “I read it in the NYT.”
Maybe I’m wrong, but I worry that most people - normal people who don’t have the time to delve into who the opinion columnists are and what their political project is - just “read the NYT,” or the WaPo, and trust that if these reputable papers print it, then it’s important.
And their takeaway from “reading the NYT” must be that, wow, there’s really something wrong with the Democrats, “the NYT” is really critical about what’s going on over there! And just to be clear: That’s not the fault of the people trusting the Paper of Record, that’s on the NYT.
Not polarization, but radicalization of the Right.
This critique by @JRubinBlogger is crucial. I am researching the history of the #polarization idea and how it rose to become a defining narrative of our time, and I’d like to add some thoughts.
Only one party, @JRubinBlogger reminds us, tolerates violence, refuses compromise in any way, and is defined by white Christian nationalism; “Only one party conducts fake election audits, habitually relies on conspiracy theories and wants to limit access to the ballot.” 2/
As @JRubinBlogger outlines convincingly in the column, the polarization interpretation therefore tends to obscure more than it illuminates. And yet, so many politicians, journalists, and pundits keep talking about how polarization is the root of all evil that plagues America. 3/
The #Rittenhouse verdict does not come as a surprise - but in conjunction with the reactions on the Right, it reveals a lot about this country and our current political moment, and none of it bodes well for the future of democracy.
A country defined by a political and social culture - characterized by white nationalism, gun fundamentalism, toxic masculinity, and glorified militancy - that is bound to produce many iterations of Kyle Rittenhouse…
A country in which the Right quickly unifies behind not only defending, but glorifying Rittenhouse’s actions…
Great experience at the local CVS: Wonderful staff, nice conversation with others who were relieved to receive their booster.
Fighting against the pandemic could have been a great effort of communal solidarity. Shame on those who keep sabotaging it.
Getting the vaccine feels great. Not just because it protects me - but because acting in solidarity with the community, helping to keep others safe in a very concrete and direct way is wonderful. It puts me in an almost festive mood: I’m doing my part, we’re doing this together!
Considering that conservatives talk about communal values and the Common Good all the time, claiming to be the bulwark against a liberal cult of selfish individuality, it is doubly shameful that they simply cannot bring themselves to embrace this as a patriotic effort.