Marc Owen Jones Profile picture
Nov 28, 2021 13 tweets 12 min read Read on X
📢🧵[Thread] 1/ Here is a thread on the #DoNotComply hashtag, a Twitter trend that started yesterday in reaction to the UK's response to the new Covid19 variant #Omicron. Essentially it is people rejecting the mandatory wearing of masks in public. I will highlight some nuggets...
2/ First up, I analysed around 17,500 tweets, replies, & retweets on the #donotcomply hashtag. The sample range is the last 24 hours. I did a network analysis to determine a few things, most importantly, identifying the most influential proponents of the 'do not comply' hashtag
3/ There is clear evidence of polarisation. There are two distinct clusters. On the right there is a large group of accounts generally condoning the #donotcomply hashtag. The group on the left is disappointed at the group on the right (pun kind of intended...you'll see why)
4/ So who are the largest supporters of #donotcomply? Well the most influential by far is @LozzaFox , actor and @thereclaimparty leader. He does not wish to comply, and endorses mass civil disobedience. He also seems mad.
5/ Other top influencers on the do not comply hashtag include @jamesfwells @MattGubba @leehurstcomic . One of my favourites is @HumanRights4UK (the state of that account!) A lot of the influential accounts also are kind of anonymous, which is obviously suspicious. #Omicron
6/ Of those most influential accounts pushing back against the hashtag are @Femi_Sorry @JackSapsford @paul_baro - and a few others, including parody account @borisjohnson_mp #donotcomply
7/ Interestingly, and perhaps not surprisingly, the polarisation looks highly partisan. An analysis of the bios of those promoting #donotcomply reveals they are mostly right wing nationalists. The top words include indicators Trump, MAGA, conservative, god, country #omicron
8/ Conversely, most of those pushing back against #donotcomply appear to having indicators of being left/progressive/liberal. Among the most common words in the bios are BLM (black lives matter), FBPE (pro EU), socialist, johnsonout (UK PM). This correlates with studies that
9/ that also suggest republicans are more likely to embrace anti vaccine disinformation than democrats, for example. Not exactly the same but related. journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
10/ So we can update the network graph to show how the polarisation is reflected on Twitter. This polarization shows in network analysis because the two communities (left and right) tend not to interact with each other and so form separate communities. #donotcomply #Omicron
11/ Some other high profile verified accounts endorsing undermining the public health message include UB40's @MattHoyOfficial debunked nutritionist @GillianMcKeith , GBNews Presenter @ToniaBuxton + many more . No eminent researchers or scientists of course. Go figure.
12/ The TLDR is those supporting the #donotcomply with mask wearing are not scientists, and generally right-wing/conservative types. There is push back from left/progressive types, but very little interaction between the two. The echo chamber is strong! Thanks for reading :)
13/ Small update
1) Some have asked about the orange blob on the map - this is George Gammon (😬). See screenshot
2) I used NodeXl and gephi for the visualisations
3) I didn't mean to imply those condemning the hashtag are scientists, merely that they're following the science!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marc Owen Jones

Marc Owen Jones Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @marcowenjones

May 15
🧵1/ Israel are attempting to muddy the waters around the killing of an international UN worker in a clearly marked vehicle. They have released a video claiming that "terrorists" are roaming and shooting at a UNRWA compound. There's no evidence that indicates they are Image
2/ terrorists. The video shows armed men mingling with what are probably UN workers. There is no sense of coercion or animosity in those shots. Crucially, there is no caveat that these people might not be factions or Hamas police protecting aid convoys.
Image
Image
3/ The US has even asked Israel to stop targeting Hamas police officers trying to protect aid. Naturally the video provides no context, and remember the IDF are an organisation that recently murdered multiple aid workers in clearly marked vehicles. Image
Read 6 tweets
May 13
🧵1/ I am somewhat dismayed (though sadly unsurprised) by this extremely disingenuous and callous reporting about Palestinian death figures. Claims that the UN have revised down its death toll are absolutely untrue but have been repeated by right wing outlets but also the CFR 🤔

Image
Image
Image
2/ These media are focusing on these two infographics by the @ochaopt . The one on the left, published 6th May, the one on the right published 8th May. As you can see, total fatalities INCREASE, as opposed to decrease. What the propaganda is seaking to do is barely sophistry
Image
Image
3/All that's happening is the OCHA has added figures for the dead that have been identified. It quite clearly says that the breakdown DOES NOT include 10000 missing or buried under rubble. Image
Read 15 tweets
May 8
1🧵Lots of lessons on how unreliable information spreads. Here, Hen Mazzig makes an unsubstantiated claim about pro-Palestinian protesters 'combing' the street for Israelis in Athens. Someone asks him for a source. Mazzig provides a source that does not support his own claim. Image
2/ Another subtle aspect of this the hotel. One widely shared tweet stated that 'rioters' were trying to break into an Israeli-owned hotel. In fact, the crowd are outside the Tiare hotel. The event is filmed FROM an Israeli owned hotel (Brown Acropol). This proximity to the Image
3/ the Israeli-owned hotel is obviously designed to make the 'attack' seem targeted. In fact, the crowd are closer to a different hotel, that is also in the centre of Athens, where there had just been a pro-Palestine protest. Image
Read 7 tweets
May 6
1/ 🧵I just did a quick corpus analysis of 100 New York Times articles published between 1st April - 5th May on US Campus Protests. Findings indicate that the NYT reporting of the campus protests place a large emphasis on equating protests with antisemitism. Image
2/ A notable finding was that the terms 'antisemitism' & 'antisemitic' appeared around 296 times, while terms such as Islamophobia/c only appeared 9 times. This is a large discrepancy. Image
3/ Jewish/Jews/Judaism are mentioned 450 times, Muslims/Islam mentioned 72, and Christian/Christianity 7. The second most common collocate (words that appear together often) of the word 'safety' and 'unsafe' is 'Jewish', (the first is students). Other minorities do not appear
Read 10 tweets
Apr 14
🧵1/ Thread on the Islamophobic and antisemitic disinformation about the #SydneyAttack . I downloaded X posts that wrongly stated that the attacker, Joel Cauchi, was either a Muslim or Jewish terrorist Image
2/ The size of the network was at least 140,000 posts (from X). This time series graph shows that initially, most of the disinformation (red bars) accused the attacker of being a Muslim or Islamist. At about 1700 UTC we see more and more disinfo about the attacker Image
3/ being Jewish (orange bars). This temporal analysis reflects the fact that there is a notable tendency when it comes to such attacks in Western countries to accuse, without evidence, the perpetrator of being Muslim. To accuse the attacker of being Jewish is less common Image
Read 21 tweets
Apr 12
🧵1/ Just want to point out a few disturbing elements regarding misinformation in this article - "What's I've Heard From Gaza" published in the @TheAtlantic . I will focus on two specific references that are quite crucial in framing a broader argument about Hamas's actions #Gaza Image
2/ The article asserts with no equivocation that Hamas killed fleeing civilians on the Al Rashid coastal road in Nov 23. Not only is there no evidence for this, but the link is to an article in the Jerusalem Post, that relies on a tweet from known disinfluencer, @amjadt25 Image
3/ Even if one wasn't to take an Occam's razor approach (i.e. it was probably the IDF since they have killed > 33000 people), then it would make sense to at least report this ambiguously. Reuters, for example, covered the strike, but did not even mention it could have been Hamas Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(