Yes, the Republican Party is radicalized and will stop at nothing to get power.
I am suggesting that this is not new, and that trying to
achieve a true liberal democracy is a constant battle.
The problem is one of expectations.
1/
People who have been following me for a while will find this threat repetitious, but I have new followers, so here goes.
One way to see the current Republican Party is that they want to return to the 1920s (or earlier!)
But let's take the 1920s.
2/
White men ruled all of our institutions: Universities, governor's mansions, both political parties, labor unions, Congress, the press, etc.
There were no laws against fixing prices, or manipulating markets, or insider trading.
3/
There were no laws against sexual harassment, and rape laws were designed to protect [White] men from false accusations. Women were expected to "guard the goods" and were blamed if they got into a situation in which they could be raped.
4/
White men could basically grab anything they wanted.
Many of the crimes those in Trump's circle are accused of were not against the law earlier in our history.
The reactionary view is that America was once pure and good and now has become corrupted and defiled.
5/
The progressive view of history goes like this:
We started out with some pretty good ideas, but a lot of people were left out.
Initially "we the people" meant White educated mostly land-owning men.
6/
The progressive view is that as we've included more people, the country has come close to its founding ideals.
For progressives, the graph looks like this:
Reactionaries see it pointing down.
7/
We didn't begin to have a true liberal democracy, by which I mean ⤵️until after 1954, the year the Supreme Court declared racial segregation illegal.
Since the 1950s and 1960s, we've been rapidly expanding who is included in "we the people."
The backlash has been fierce.
8/
In fact, the graph is not a smooth upward slope. It looks like this ⤵️
If people think that criminal prosecution will (1) cripple (or stop) the forces of right-wing extremism or (2) ensure a Democratic win in 2022, I can understand the panic and frustration.
I think this belief underlies much of the frustration and panic which is causing people to blame Democrats for Republican lawbreaking on the grounds that Democrats are stubbornly refusing to do The Thing that will make the problem go away.
🔹By statute, the docs go to Congress unless Trump gets a court order.
🔹Deciding his lawsuit on the merits will take months, and by then it will be too late because the docs will be on their way (in tranches) to Congress
2/
🔹So Trump filed a motion asking for a preliminary injunction asking for the docs to be held until the court can decide the case on the merits.
🔹It's harder to get a preliminary injunction than it is to win on the merits because there are additional elements to meet.
3/
The conflict is between the former and current president, not between the branches.
Issue: So what is the role of the courts?
Can the court overrule the incumbent president on behalf of a former president?
Here we get these hypotheticals. What if four former presidents disagree with the incumbent president. (Implication: What if the current president is totally off his rocker?)
Answer: There is still no clash between the branches.
What if instead of repeating: "there've been no consequences," everyone did:
"OMG, the Trump Org has been INDICTED for FRAUD!
And the GJ is still hearing evidence."
Repeat a million times. Let it sink into the public consciousness. ("Her emails")
Instead of minimizing it.
These things puff Trump up and help his Strongman image:
🔹There are never any consequences!
🔹He gets away with everything"
🔹Yeah, okay, but what about . . . ?
These guys ⤵️LOVE when you say that.
("no consequences" also isn't true)
2/
The right-wing understands how to do that. They take something that wasn't a crime ("her emails") and repeat it over and over. Mainstream media picks it up. Pretty soon even people who don't know better start thinking HRC was a crook.