I really don't understand conservatives in 🇺🇸&🇬🇧 who demand a crackdown on illegal immigration but also refuse to even consider any national ID system or population register because that would be 'big government'.
You cannot have well-controlled immigration and small government.
This is the point 🇫🇷 are making by saying 🇬🇧 is making itself "attractive" to migrants crossing the channel.
The "attraction" is the lack of a national ID system and population register in UK which makes it easier to live/work illegally than in continental Europe, which has IDs.
In 🇺🇸, Republicans in Arizona enacted controversial "papers please" law which mandated police to ask for legality proof from anyone suspected of being an ilelgal immigrant (aka, non-white).
You cannot ask that if there isn't a requirement for *everyone* to carry a national ID.
The opposition to national IDs is an anglophone phenomenon. As far as I'm aware there is no English-speaking country that has them.
But every country in continental Europe has them.
Comes from an aversion to "big government". But small government means less immigration control
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Migrants caught in the middle of a disastrous low in Anglo-French relations.
UK politicians blaming French for lack of border vigilance. French politicians blaming British for extensive black market labour conditions that act as a pull across the channel. politico.eu/article/france…
"Everyone knows there are more than 1.2 million illegal immigrants in Great Britain, and that British employers use this labor force to make things that the British manufacture and consume," says French Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin.
This is a point European politicians have long made privately, but never so publicly before.
They say it's easier to work as an undocumented worker in UK than in continental Europe, which is why people try to cross the channel even after they've already snuck into EU/Schengen.
EU Vice President @VeraJourova announcing now new Commission proposals to reinforce democracy and the integrity of national elections in the EU.
It includes a proposal for new rules on political advertising, electoral rights and funding of political parties.
“Elections must not be a competition of opaque and non-transparent methods," says Jourova.
"People must know why they are seeing an ad, who paid for it, how much, what micro-targeting criteria were used. New technologies should be tools for emancipation, not for manipulation."
Some of the proposed EU rules emulate what has been attempted in the US to stop opaque campaign financing.
Paid political advertising would have to be clearly labelled with key information including the name of the sponsor prominently displayed, and declaring the amount spent.
Key line suggests new German government wants to break from the practice until now of handicapping the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs role created in 2009 (countries have given limited powers and not appointed strong people).
It calls for “a real EU foreign minister"
So, the new German government may depart from status quo until now of Germany pretending it's a Switzerland and holding back the EU from taking a strong role in the world.
They may also break from the German orthodoxy until now of resisting true EU fiscal union and solidarity.
EU High Rep @JosepBorrellF on new #Belarus sanctions following EU foreign ministers' meeting:
"We are looking at all possible solutions to stop the Lukashenko regime from targeting us, and targeting its own population." audiovisual.ec.europa.eu/en/ebs/live/2?…
Though the legal basis to expand the EU's sanctions against Belarus was adopted today, the specific list of who/what will be sanctioned was not.
That will be adopted in the coming days, Borrell says.
Borrell's message to migrants: "The road to the EU does not lead through #Belarus."
EU is "providing information in order to avoid people being instrumentalised and weaponised with a political objective. This is illegal, and inhuman."
I’m at a global travel & tourism conference in León, Spain - hearing from industry experts about what they’re expecting for the next year.
This is an industry on its knees, and much of what I heard was depressing. But there’s also very promising signs. Some takeaways: (🧵 1/6)
One thing’s clear: industry feels EU’s successful #VaccinePassport scheme saved the summer.
Travel within 🇪🇺 now totally open and mostly hassle-free, esp compared to European countries requiring PCR test instead (UK). But travel outside EU will stay at low levels for some time.
I heard predictions that travel & tourism sector won’t recover to 2019 levels until *2025*.
Many tourism businesses will fold if it takes that long. What do they need? Quick international coordination on travel requirements and globally recognised vaccination certification.