Yossi Gestetner Profile picture
Nov 29, 2021 13 tweets 5 min read Read on X
🚨 🚨 🚨 SECOND booster offered in the UK for people who are immunocompromised; intervals between original shot(s) and booster cut from 6 months to 3 months.

The less effective the C19 vaccines turn out to be, the more the clowns double down on it such as the new steps above. ImageImage
The words “the vaccine work” do heavier and heavier lifting as time goes by: Immunocompromised people in the UK will now be “offered” a second booster, and boosters will be avail 3 months after the shot(s); down from 6 months.

Showing up at the job 10 hours a week means “work.” ImageImage
Second booster in the UK before the year is over on the first shot; time between shot(s) and booster is cut from 6 months to 3.

But as long it helps for a few months, we better say “it works” or else it’s “disinformation.”

State AGs would be onto this if it were not a vaccine. ImageImage
In the same weekend we are told that vaccines may need an adjustment to beat #Omicron but to quickly take an existing one because they work so great that immunicompromized people in the UK R offered a 2nd booster, and adults should take the booster in 3 - instead of 6 - months.
Only vaccine fanatics don’t feel being had by the above circus.
You better say “the battery works” even if it needs recharging sooner and for longer hours than advertised or else you are spreading disinformation against the battery; you conspiracy theorist.

The joke’s on us and will be until Fauci and the CDC get challenged by Journalists.
The UK is up to the 2nd booster for people who are immunocompromised and cut the booster time from 6 months after taking the shot(s) to 3.

Both steps are done because the vaccines are weaker than thought. Instead of focusing on care, they double down on jabs.

Vaccine fanatics.
The less it works, the more it is being pushed. What’s up with that?

Insanity. Vaccine fanaticism. Idiots being used by pharma in their effort to push a product.

I mean, how else do you explain this craziness?
Early shot takers were under the assumption that if they get it out of the way, they are protected for a while. They didn’t know of a booster; sure not 2 boosters; sure not a booster 3 MONTHS after the shots, and that being C19 vaxxed can still leave them dead from COVID-19.
I am not aware of any other private sector major product that can be this oversold and underdeliver this much without companies’ stock crashing; without there being a massive media scandal and without dozens of state consumer agencies or AGs stepping in.
“Quick quick. Go get your C19 shot to avoid #Omicorn which may need a not-yet developed different shot.”

This is practically the message from health officials and C19 vaccine sales staff.

Really strange.
Flashback to how the coronavirus vaccines were sold a mere few months ago. (It helps explain why so many people wrongly think that being vaccinated against C19 means they cannot get infected from COVID suffer from it.)

Disinformation times over.
“Stocks, oil prices fall as Moderna CEO says current vaccines will struggle with Omicron.”

C19 vaccine shortcomings were first blamed on the unvaccinated. Now, it’s blamed on a new variant.

Sweet.

BTW, if it “struggles” with new variants, the gain of getting one diminishes. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yossi Gestetner

Yossi Gestetner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @YossiGestetner

Oct 29
🧵🧵🧵

Hi. Please vote regardless of the content below.

People have often rejected the claim that election fraud ("mistakes & errors") occurred in 2020 in the 100s or in the 1000s; which is a huge sum considering that states are often very narrowly decided.

Let's look at GA.
2/ Do date, Biden officially won GA by 11,709 votes which is a 0.23% margin among the 4.93 million votes.

How narrow is a 0.23% margin?

Well, let's read what the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) wrote on Nov 19, 2020 following a statewide manual recount:
3/ "No county had an error rate higher than 0.73% compared to their original results" in a state decided by 0.23%

If a manual, rushed recount uncovered in one place an error rate larger than the state's margin of victory, what would a thorough investigation statewide find? Image
Read 15 tweets
Sep 11
I told you
I told you
I told you
I told you
I told you

PANTS PISSING Cons ran for the hills about the debate due to some fake mediaaa expectations and because, well, they are pants pissers.

👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼 Image
The main attack by Harris was that Trump is a danger, unprepared and a joke to lead the country, yet 54% in the instant CNN poll have confidence in both candidates' ability to run the US, and Trump LEADS by 4 among those who have "a lot of confidence."

Her main attack FAILED! Image
While the main Harris attack (Orange Man Bad) failed miserably as seen in the poll results above, Trump connected Harris to the Biden Mess so effectively that Harris begged him to stop ("you are not running against Biden") and Trump indeed GAINED a net 4 on the economy:

👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼 Image
Read 12 tweets
Sep 8
1/ Biden-Harris admitted into the US 5.6 mill undocumented immigrants and millions more are not in the count, yet the @HouseGOP is too scared to dare Dems to shut the government to keep this mess going.

Instead, Republicans blame themselves by saying "we are not shutting down."
2/ If Republicans can't hold the line against something to the Radical Left of Dems from a mere 10 years ago, why run/win?

Where are the supposed principles?

Even IF holding the line here (and on impeachment) "costs" Republicans, well, gotta put Country Over Party. No?
3/ Republicans made immigration a big issue in #NY03 yet lost big time in the Special in part because voters don't see @HouseGOP as the fix to this problem.

Generic Ballot sucks for the GOP now too. Is it because the GOP is too harsh on this crisis? No. It's the opposite!
Read 8 tweets
Sep 2
Below is the first Tweet-share by @RashidaTlaib since the news that Hamas, a government whose lies she spreads on speed dial, executed an American. No other tweet or tweet share as of now; 36 hours after the news broke.
There is also nothing by @RepRashida.

Obviously, it is the opinion of @RashidaTlaib (and/or the opinion of many of her voters) that Hamas had a 'legitimate context' to execute an American last week or else she would easily tweet against it as she does to echo lies by Hamas.
@RepRashida @RashidaTlaib I am not outraged by Tlaib's lack of outrage on the execution of an American.

I am pointing it out so that people understand the poisonously-depraved world view of her "cause."

If she, a US-born & Elected Official is this depraved, imagine the views by those on the lower rungs.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 5
Don't blaming Powell for not cutting soon enough.

Blame Corporate/Regime Media for propping up a dead economy; for hyping bad reports as good which impacted the thinking of Fed officials that with inflation not yet settled, the economy can absorb continued high rates.
When the economy was in recession in 2022 (two net negative quarters of GDP; meaning by the end of the second quarter the economy was smaller than before the first), we were gaslit that this isn't a recession. The term was changed in real time like in 1984 propaganda fashion.
As a result of the propaganda, consumers kept spending and the economy recovered; underpinned by federal spending, not by a "real" economy. Then, part time jobs gains at the place of full time ones were sold as all in the same; feeding the hype of a "good" economy.
Read 8 tweets
Jul 12
Biden certainly had worse public appearances since the debate than this pressser, but stop the propaganda that this was good.

He rambled on.

Confused names & things.

Stopped mid-point confusingly with "anyways."

And he wasn't pushed like Trump was in the @Acosta-era heckling.
Questions were given mostly only to state-aligned media.

Half the questions were about policy; not the key issue at hand.

He was not called to task about the lies of his administration regarding his medical tests.

The bar for this was set so low that this is "good."

Ha.
We are being propagandized:

The questions and behavior was what Putin gets; not Trump or DeSantis.

Yet, he rambled on confusingly. Offered up word salads and repeatedly stopped midpoint with "anyways" because he had no clue what he was saying.

This is "good," per narrative.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(