In marketplaces, transaction frequency & building user habits is more important than having the highest overall GMV.
Let's consider NFTs on Solana vs Ethereum through this lens, by comparing @MagicEden_NFT vs. @opensea:
In the last 30 days:
- Magic Eden GMV is ~1/10th of Opensea ($216M vs. $1.9B)
- But 2x as many transactions are happening on Magic Eden vs. Opensea: 2.27M vs. 1M
- 1/2 as many users for Magic Eden: 107K vs. 228K
(this is 2 months after Magic Eden launched, btw!)
This means each user on Magic Eden is transacting 4x as much as Opensea users.
Magic Eden users are doing ~20 txns/month, vs. OS users are doing about 4.4 🤯
Importantly, Solana NFTs are also much more accessible in terms of price point:
- The average price point of a Magic Eden transaction was $116
- The average price point of an OS transaction was $2,057
The relative difference here has huge implications on mass adoption
Higher frequency of purchase means greater user retention, which means more opportunities to step into adding value for other areas of users' lives.
Consider the trajectory of Uber:
Uber Black ➡️ UberX ➡️ Uber Eats & other product lines
Building habits among users is of utmost importance, because it lets you increase share of wallet.
Those consumer habits are forming on Solana where technology is not a bottleneck.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
DAOs (decentralized autonomous organizations) represent the next step forward in the labor movement.
A thread 🧵
Some history: the labor movement grew out of the Industrial Revolution, when workers organized together to fight for their common interest and negotiate with employers for better working conditions & pay.
The legacy of the labor movement is all around us. Among other things, it brought us: minimum wage, abolition of child labor, equal pay for equal work, fair employment, family leave, etc.
These rights didn’t just happen spontaneously—they were fought for by organized workers.
Pinching myself that I got to write about the future of creators & ownership in @TheEconomist
"Creators will harness their power, leading to the birth of a new set of platforms that confer ownership and control—and treat creators as first-class citizens"
Above all, thank you to all the founders who are building towards a more meritocratic internet, in the @AtelierVentures & @variantfund portfolios & beyond!
Our portfolio companies are hiring across the board — if the vision outlined in this piece resonates with you, please fill out this talent form to be connected!
What’s next for the creator economy & its intersection with web3? 🧵
At a high level, we’re moving from a world in which creators made income on their own, to one in which they build wealth together with their communities.
The creator economy isn’t new, but it’s constantly evolving.
We’re now in what I consider to be the 3rd era of the creator economy, and on the cusp of the 4th.
Last year, I founded Atelier to invest in the passion economy: new platforms that enable users to monetize individuality.
The mission has been crystal clear since day one: to create paths for economic mobility at scale by lowering the barriers to entrepreneurship.
The passion economy is the clear “what” that we are driving towards, but there is a next chapter of the thesis.
Crypto and the ownership economy—software that is built, operated, and owned by users & participants—presents a “how” for fully realizing the passion economy mission.
Like feudalism and divine right monarchy before it, the creator economy is experiencing a legitimacy crisis.
Creators are questioning the terms that govern their relationship with the platforms they utilize—and the right of the platforms to set those terms in the first place.
How the ecosystem responds—what alternatives are proposed, who builds them, and how—will shape the next phase of the Creator Economy.