Occasionally I think about how this group of anti-anti-Trump 'journalists' got literally every single thing wrong, while declaring total vindication and that everyone else repent for their wrongness. Truly hilarious stuff.
Rarely do you see a self-own in such a thorough manner; laid out point by point, each one more wrong than the next. But when you're a bold, adversarial not-a-trump-supporter journalist, there are no limits to what you can do.
lol
"Trump didn't actually want it, you idiots. It's all just a big dumb show."- vindicated journalist jr.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
To me, funding opposition research is the same exact thing as funding purposeful disinformation. I am Ken Vogel, serious journalist.
DI$INFO. What a fcking hack this guy is.
Ken Vogel is a big fan of opposition research when it's Rudy Giuliani and his associates shoveling into his hands (causing him to completely blow the pivotal story behind the 2nd impeachment). Dem oppo research? Not so much.
Wow you're telling me that Aaron Coleman, weeks after being arrested for domestic violence, got arrested for a DUI? But some very serious 'journalists' said he was a 'redemption' story and that he had apologized and changed his ways. Shocking.
The GOP is/was never actually against 'government handouts,' only when they go to the 'wrong people.' They love 'big gub'ment socialism' when it goes to themselves because obviously they are the only ones who are deserving.
Which is why it's pretty obvious that Medicare For All would never get GOP support. Medicare For All (Whites Only) on the hand...
Btw not a single mention in this Axios super-savvy wankfest about the actual human costs of what the
GOP encouraging people not to get vaccinated entails. Just how it sticks it to Biden & how it's a savvy midterm base-rallier. So great.
Glem really thinks that this quote by Tucker is not racist? What's that? I'm being told that this is an original Glem quote and not from Tucker. Oh...well I guess that makes sense as to why he would defend bigots from accusations of racism.
Time is a flat circle. 16 years on the dot, Glenn is defending another massive racist/bigot in Tom Tancredo from @owillis & @kdrum's 'cheap smear' of calling him racist. TOM TANCREDO! Now 16 years later, Great Replacement Tucker is the victim of people calling him racist.
On a related note, remember when it came out that Tucker called Iraqis 'semiliterate primitive monkeys' & he was like, "people shouldn't be judged by their worst moments. Let's see his apology before we judge him.' And then he never apologized & Glem never brought it up again.
Glem spent yesterday insisting that the US media called Rittenhouse's victims 'Black' and when asked for proof, all he could cite was one single (quickly corrected) bullet point on a news outlet from the UK. Narratives above all truth; that's the Bold, Adversarial way!
"I'll answer in a second." You'll be shocked to know that he not only never answered, but instead just descended into a series of weird name-calling and non sequiturs , in typical journalistic fashion.
Also this interaction is pretty funny, given that as of not very long ago, these 2 were holding hands to call out The Great FAKE NEWS Russia Hoax (with Adam arguing that there was *too much* proof for the hacking to actually be Russia).