🧵 Thinking about the SCOTUS abortion case. There are many reasons folks oppose abortion. BUT the "sanctity of life" rhetoric always bothers me cuz folks who want to restrict abortion are also *more likely to be* folks who disregard life (or nonviolence, mercy) the most. Data: 1/
The 2018 GSS asked if adults thought state abortion laws should be easier or harder. Note that those who want to make abortion harder are more likely to favor death penalty, want courts to be harsher, oppose gun permits, & would approve of police hitting mouthy citizens. 2/
Conservs. can argue first 2 (death penalty, harsher courts) are "pro-life" in that being harsh w/criminals may preserve innocent life.

Harder to make that argument w/the other 2 questions, suggesting folks who wanna make abortion harder are just more pro-guns & authoritarian. 3/
We see same patterns in our PDES panel data. We asked adults whether they thought abortion should be legal or illegal. Look how those groups differ on guns. Abortion abolitionists are FAR more likely to venerate gun rights & favor gun violence as THE solution to gun violence. 4/
What about authoritarian control & violence? In another set of PDES questions, we find abortion abolitionists are FAR more likely to wish we used death penalty more, think letting the guilty go free is worse than condemning the innocent, & favor any-means-necessary policing. 5/
What about violence in general or political violence? Same pattern. Abortion abolitionists are just more open to violence in principle. But look at the question farthest right. Abortion abolitionists are WAY more likely to say patriots may have to "Jan 6" the govt to save US! 6/
Lastly, look at responses to COVID. Who rejects life-saving vaccine & disregards the vulnerable? No surprise. Abortion abolitionists are FAR more likely to say they don't plan on getting vaxxed & in May 2020 were more likely to say saving economy was worth risking the elderly. 7/
Let me clarify. These data DO NOT show that ALL persons who wanna outlaw abortion are doing so because they're authoritarians or mean or violent or whatever. As I said in my first tweet, reasons for favoring any policy are diverse and complex. However... 8/
What data DO show is abortion abolitionists are MORE LIKELY TO BE pro-violence, pro-death penalty, unjustly punitive, authoritarian, pro-guns, & anti-vax/restrictions than those who'd keep it legal.

Thus "we who value life" isn't a good descriptor of abortion abolitionists. 9/9

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Samuel Perry

Samuel Perry Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @socofthesacred

22 Nov
Visiting the Civil Rights Museum with my kiddos on the way through Memphis. Struck by how little has changed in terms of how many white Americans view the law when they feel threatened. Image
Image
John Lewis ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
11 Nov
NEW @SF_Journal study! Emerson & Smith (2000) argued "evangelical religion" divided Black & White Americans on racial inequality. We show it's more accurate to say white #ChristianNationalism explains the gap. 1/ @ndrewwhitehead @RyonCobb @JoshuaGrubbsPhD
academic.oup.com/sf/advance-art…
We propose #ChristianNationalism operates (1) as an "epistemology of ignorance" for whites that allows them to rewrite history as "Christian" & "good" & ignore past & present injustices. But (2) it also builds on the fact that "Christian nation" language is racially-coded. 2/
Examining various outcomes, we show the more whites affirm our "race neutral" #ChristianNationalism measures, the more they deny anti-Black injustice & the more they think whites are unfairly targeted. But Blacks' views on racial injustice don't change as CN increases. Why? 3/
Read 6 tweets
7 Nov
Please don’t miss what she means by “Christian.”

In her mind, “Christian” isn’t a faith, but is a totalizing culture (hers) that is antithetical to a multicultural society.

This is what I mean when I say conservatives use “Christian” as a dog whistle for “white people like us.”
You see other explicit examples like this one from the Christian post. Here the author uses “white America” to refer to all biblical Christians. Why? Cuz in her mind, and those of her readers, they’re the same.
google.com/amp/s/www.chri…
Or here’s one from Eric Metaxas a few years back. Does this guy really think Jesus was “white” like him? Maybe. But more likely he means “Jesus was one of us. He’s on our side.”

Again, “Christian” just becomes code for “white people like us.”
Read 4 tweets
28 Oct
New Report! @ndrewwhitehead & I provided modest consulting here & we’re thrilled @PewReligion is exploring #ChristianNationalism.

I DO NOT speak for Pew in ANY capacity. But I’m happy to offer thoughts on findings for media. Here are some highlights: 1/8
pewforum.org/2021/10/28/in-…
First, what’s with different numbers? These are not the questions we’ve used. Pew used different wording & MOST importantly, different response options (they discuss this in the report). They’re gonna get somewhat different results. So not strictly comparable to our findings. 2/8
Do percentages seem low? Again, different measures. Further, we already found declining CN between 2007-2017, so lower was expected. AND CN has been on blast for a year+. I’d be SHOCKED if social desirability wasn’t curbing affirmative CN responses by March 2021 (post Jan 6). 3/8
Read 8 tweets
26 Jun
THREAD: Check this out. Something I didn't include in this article due to space limitations. In the JAAR study I argued that the ESV systematically removed "slave" language over time, likely for PR reasons.

But could it ever be strategic to INTRODUCE slave language? YEP! ⬇️ 1/6
The fact that the NT never formally condemns slavery is an apologetics problem, especially when there's so much in there about slaves obeying masters & even Christians *being masters* (1 Tim 6:2; Eph 6:9; Philemon).

But wouldn't it be so great if Paul DID condemn slavery??? 2/6
In 1 Tim 1:10, Paul lists a group of "lawbreakers" including "andrapodistes." Most literal NT translations rendered this "kidnappers" or "menstealers." But note how this has been revised in recent years. ESV & LSV go with "enslavers" & NRSV, NASB, CSB go with "slave traders." 3/6 Image
Read 6 tweets
12 Mar
New Study! Let's be mature here.

Our Thesis: Evangelical subculture fosters masculine insecurity. We propose that insecurity ExtenZe to physical bodies & yes, the penis. But how to study penis insecurity? Everyone would lie.

But NOBODY lies to Google. 1/ onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/js…
We initially wanted to title this "Christic Manhood Syndrome?" or "Not Measuring Up?" but decided the topic was provocative enough.

Shout-outs to the research of @kkdumez @sarahdief @kelsyburke @ParadoxOfBelief @c_j_pascoe and Emile Durkheim. 2/end
And FWIW, this is "evangelical adherence" by denomination, but we also tested evangelical by self-identification (using Pew data) and the results were substantively the same.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(