Is nobody remotely interested in "WHY" Jussie Smollett faked a hate crime?

@VP @KamalaHarris & @CoryBooker—two senators with presidential aspirations and no legislative achievements to speak of, had just revealed an anti-lynching bill.

They cited his fake hate crime to push it.
I have a very hard time believing media wouldn't be exploring their personal relationship in more detail if it appeared a rightwing celebrity faked an event that coincidentally helped push Republican legislation sponsored by a friend.

I'm not a big believer in coincidence.
These tweets were very clearly coordinated. Look at the language they share and the time between them, both of which being right after the story made headlines in gateway liberal publications.

"Modern day lynching" seems brainstormed to me.

#WhatAreTheOdds?

Let's explore it.
The last clear-cut case of lynching in the U.S. was Michael McDonald in 1981, nearly 4 decades ago. Before that, see the pic.

Sure, @VP @KamalaHarris and @CoryBooker could've hit the jackpot with the first lynching since 81.

But as a stats guy, it's more likely total bu!!$#!t.
For the record, nobody escaped justice for the lynching of Michael McDonald, which was a horrible and true display of racism.

Henry Francis Hays was convicted & executed in the electric chair. Rest were convicted save for Bennie Hays. Heart attack got him
peoplespunditdaily.com/policy/2019/02…
But like Jussie Smollett's hate crime, the push for anti-lynching legislation came out of nowhere, not from some need to combat a growing or even existing problem in society.

Very much appears two senators with aspirations for higher office needed something on empty resumes.
It's clearly detailed in the source article, but should be noted here, too.

The record says Mack Charles Parker was lynched for the kidnap and rape of a white woman. The accusations were disputed, somewhat credibly in my opinion.

Sadly, we'll likely never know the truth.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rich "The People's Pundit" Baris

Rich

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Peoples_Pundit

2 Dec
1. I'm highly skeptical of the assertion that a SCOTUS ruling against Roe would result in political blowback favoring Democrats.

There are a number of reasons, which I will list.

But to sum, the "pro-choice" designation is no longer dominant, and it no longer means what it did.
2. In "SELECT A COLUMN DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLE", choose "ABORTION DESIGNATION", and load the table.

Aside from the nation being split on the designation, a significant number of those who refer to themselves as "pro-choice" do not oppose such restrictions.
application.marketsight.com/app/ItemView.a… Americans' Views on Abortion and Recent Proposals to Restric
3. Forget 15 weeks. More than 1/5 "pro-choice" voters do support the heartbeat bill; more than a third (33.4) support banning abortion after the "Pain" threshold is reached; and 54.6% support bans on late-term abortion in the final 3 months. application.marketsight.com/app/ItemView.a… Americans' Views on Abortion and Recent Proposals - Polling
Read 6 tweets
2 Dec
Come on @GStephanopoulos. Cut the crap?

You always use that fraudulent “why speak out now?” line, when you damn well know why they are talking to you.

Your “exclusives” pick you to help them lie to America. That’s your entire grift.

This is a little sick, America.
"I would never point a gun at someone and pull the trigger."

See, that's a problem. Any responsible gun owner knows the first part of that sentence is enough. You never point a firearm at anyone, period. Not unless you intend to use it.

And triggers don't pull themselves.
I smell an attempt to blame firearm manufacturers for a privileged, entitled celebrity who had no business pointing a weapon at anyone, killing his colleague.

Triggers don't pull—squeeze actually, never pull—themselves. That doesn't happen.

And he failed to clear the weapon.
Read 4 tweets
30 Nov
1. Musicians in 2021 are talentless. For proof, I submit the 30-year comparison.

Releases in 1991:
Guns N’ Roses: Use Your Illusion I & II (Greatest rock masterpiece ever)
Nirvana: Nevermind
Metallica: Black
R.E.M. – Out of Time
Soundgarden – Badmotorfinger
Pearl Jam – Ten
...
2. Releases in 1991 (2021 musicians SUCK continued):

Prince & The New Power Generation: Diamonds and Pearls
Garth Brooks: Ropin’ the Wind
Gang Starr: Step in the Arena
Reba McEntire: For My Broken Heart (Dedicated to prior band who died in plane crash)
Queen: Innuendo

...
3. Releases in 1991 (2021 musicians SUCK continued):

Michael Jackson: Dangerous
Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers: Into the Great Wide Open
U2: Achtung Baby
2Pac: 2Pacalypse Now
Ozzy Osbourne: No More Tears
Red Hot Chili Peppers: Blood Sugar Sex Magik

...
Read 7 tweets
17 Nov
BOOM: 113,655 watching now on @RekietaMedia YouTube with @barnes_law, @thevivafrei, @NiermanJoe and more...

And hearing how badly the defense team continues to bungle this up.
If the media weren't so horribly corrupt, they'd be reporting the real story re: the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, which is gross prosecutorial misconduct and how crooked "officers of the court" swearing to uphold the law can railroad innocent citizens who have no voice.
Once upon a time, real "journalists" used to care about the powerful using the machine and abusing the system to crush the little guy in society.

Now, they ARE in the machine, even though many of them are too naive to realize it. Others do realize it, and are happy to be tools.
Read 4 tweets
6 Nov
The infrastructure bill will not help Democrats anymore than tax reform helped Republicans.

1) in case people missed Virginia, it’s not a priority for voters.
2) history
3) even if it was structured to benefit all like tax reform, and it’s not, there’s no impact before 2022.
I’ll add this… Tonight’s vote is why @joekent16jan19 will defeat @HerreraBeutler in WA-03, and @RepKinzinger was forced to retire to Lobby Land before he was embarrassed.

There are at least a dozen others I could’ve cited. But they will exemplify 2022.
To be clear, I’m not suggesting that tonight’s vote was “the” reason. I’m saying that it exemplifies “the” reason.

And that reason is a lack of representation. A lot of Republicans were stupid enough to believe the post-Trump delusion, and they’re going to pay for it.

Watch.
Read 4 tweets
18 Oct
Virginia shouldn’t be close. It is because of Joe Biden, who is toxic in a state he won by 10 points.
Joe Biden's approval rating among independents in Virginia is in the 30s.
Democrats are going to need a big turnout edge in Virginia to NOT lose competitive districts like the 7th in 2022. Voters say Joe Biden's job performance, which is considerably underwater, is the main reason they'll vote Republican in the midterms, even many McAuliffe voters.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(