Hmm yes, notably it was libs who were like 'the 2016 election is nbd. We can just lose and there will not be any repercussions like a RW SC intent on overturning Roe'. And you & all your sage leftist friends were like, 'What? That's irresponsable. Roe is on the line."
It definitely wasn't your buddies like Matt Bruenig mocking women who were in tears at a Trump victory (and the cringe 'whine moms' out marching) at the realization at what it would bring us- a RW supreme court doing exactly what it set out to do. No sir.
Just garbage gaslighting from these people. Surprised none of them are trying to claim that actually *they* were the ones warning about how dangerous a Trump victory would be.
My fault. I should've known it already happened. Shame on me for being naive.
It's actually quite sad. When "she" started she had random dude pundits like Yglesias and Chait signal boosting her 'amazing' substack. And then she wrote like 1 blog about Kamala's laugh and 3 about 'her' origin story...and then just stopped altogether.
All I ever see 'her' doing now is acting as a Glem (the bad one) reply guy and defending him (& Trump) from criticism. And I guess fishing for ppl to buy her a new Macbook.
Also never did that @is_that_a_read expose that she promised. A real letdown.
My God he's stillll going. Just unbelievable. Got caught in a straight up lie and still insisting he was right & righteous. Him and Sirota really are merging into the same person.
Wonder why Sirota rt'ed that and oh.....the dude is so obsessive he even sees screenshots that mention him.
One of my favorite Glem tics is when he says something is 'an undeniable truth' based on absolutely nothing other than him wanting it to be true. This RWer satirical video is proof enough (says the guy running around getting showered w/ funds from billionaire after billionaire).
There is just absolutely no way this is true but Glem is now full-on on the RW media money spigot, so it's just so self-evidently true based on......welll, dude just trust me. What about Soros?
Me: You're fucking worthless. I care about outcomes, unlike you who just wants to do smug posturing
Also me: Lol you rubes told people to vote to stop your state being governed by some far RW MAGA guy, instead of doing smug posturing? Such losers.
Will Stencil: I never reacted to that 4-sec video (that I clearly reacted to) that you posted...The context is right there in the thread, you deranged Establishment shill.
*links to a tweet that was posted 5 minutes after his original tweet*
Also a great example of the "Just Take the L" principle; why you don't keep digging when you've clearly got something completely wrong. It can always get worse for you, if you just continue to double down on something that literally everyone can tell that you were wrong on.
Hey look man, I'm sorry you fell for a 4 second clip put out by some random RWer. Maybe try to do better and not get duped, rather than lashing out at others who didn't and doubling down afterward.
It would be much easier to just say, "I messed up. I reacted to a 4-sec RW clip b/c it confirmed my biases. My bad," instead of w/e this is. But no, I guess admitting you were wrong would be giving those evil Libs who you hate vindication...or soething.
It's like when David Sirota would get caught lying or manipulating some quote/screen and rather than admit it would respond with some dumb, 'Oh you just hate anyone who doesn't praise the Dems 24/7.' No dude, we just hate bullshitters and people who post willful disinformation.
Occasionally I think about how this group of anti-anti-Trump 'journalists' got literally every single thing wrong, while declaring total vindication and that everyone else repent for their wrongness. Truly hilarious stuff.
Rarely do you see a self-own in such a thorough manner; laid out point by point, each one more wrong than the next. But when you're a bold, adversarial not-a-trump-supporter journalist, there are no limits to what you can do.