उपर्युक्त मन्त्रका 'मन्त्ररामायण' (७१) में नीलकण्ठने इस प्रकार भाष्य किया है
"ब्रह्माण्डपिण्डमाक्रान्तुं शक्तो रुद्रस्तं हनुमद्रूपं रुद्रेषु मध्ये रुद्रियं रुद्रकर्माहँ शत्रुसंहारक्षमं हवामहे ऊतये स्वकार्यसमृद्धये स्वेष्टसिध्यर्थमित्यर्थः ।' 2/6
Sri Rama Himself
"प्रसन्नमूर्तिस्तरुणः शिवांशः" ~ नारदपुराण (पूर्व तृ० ७९ । ३५३)
(रुद्ररूप श्रीहनुमानजी तरुण हैं, प्रसन्नमुद्रामें स्थित शिवांश हैं)
4/6
Therefore, when Tulsi Baba writes "शंकर सुवन केसरी नंदन।" or "चारों जुग परताप तुम्हारा।" in his Hanuman Chalisa, just accept it. Because whatever he writes(though in Awadhi and not in Sanskrit), he writes per his declaration of "नानापुराणनिगमागमसम्मतं यद्....".
5/6
Goswami Tulsidas was a Brahmin of ब्रह्मावर्त and didn't earn his शास्त्रज्ञान from the English translations of Protestant Padre as an office coolie of Shweta-Maleccha. Take him seriously even if his writings (deliberately) are in Bhasha despite him being a Vidwan of Sanskrit.6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You know the reality of why you said that. Ask yourself honestly with a hand on your heart. As I said, your "Aoukaat" is to wash the bum (in the form of doing Swastivachan) of anyone who can throw some coins.
Effing मोहपातर!!
Dora's Arse Wiper tried hitting 2 birds (( i) Mocking Shiva's temple per his Madhwaite beliefs and (ii) cursing Modi for rejecting Swastivachan offer and not throwing coins) with one stone hiding behind this post-facto lame excuse and thought nobody will notice it.
Even someone with the head in his arse will know that BJP is the least harmful (if not pro Hindu as Trads say) to Hindu interests. Because any party who has Muslim vote as its power base, it can offer you "Revadi and Malayi" but it can't offer anything+ 1/
Tulsidas didn't start any new school like post 1000AD Vaishnavacharyas. His tradition is the same as that of Veda Vyasaya, Sukdeva, Yagnavalkya ie श्रौत-स्मार्त tradition which existed before the advent of post 1000AD Vaishnavism. He states it by "नानापुराणनिगमागमसम्मतं यद्...."
I quote Tulsidas not because I like him. I like him because he never deviates from श्रुति मार्ग of Veda Vyasa, Sukdeva, and other ancient Vedic sages. The same can't be said about post 1000AD Vaishnavacharyas.
Maybe but the fact remains that paramAtma Hari in his ultimate form (तत्वत:) is
"वदन्ति तत्तत्त्वविदस्तत्त्वं यज्ज्ञानमद्वयम्।
ब्रह्मेति परमात्मेति भगवानिति शब्द्यते" ~ श्रीमद्भागवतम् १।२।११
Exactly!! You see the continuity of श्रीमद्भागवत in Ramcharitmanas when Tulsidas writes "सेवक स्वामि सखा सिय पी के।" (जो(शिव) सीतापति श्री रामचन्द्रजी के सेवक, स्वामी और सखा हैं) for Mahadeva. You find this missing in post 1000AD Vaishnava Sampradayas.
भावार्थ:-विनती करके सब देवता चले गए। उसी समय देवर्षि नारद आए।आकाश के ऊपर से उन्होंने श्री हरि के सुंदर वीर रसयुक्त गुण समूह का गान किया, जो प्रभु के मन को बहुत ही भाया। मुनि यह कहकर चले गए कि अब दुष्ट रावण को शीघ्र मारिए। (उस समय) श्री रामचंद्रजी रणभूमि में आकर सुशोभित हुए।
2/2
क्या गाँधी के राम ऐसे हो सकते हैं जिनके शरीर पर वध किये गये आततायियों के खून के छींटे हों?😊
संग्राम भूमि बिराज रघुपति अतुल बल कोसल धनी।
श्रम बिंदु मुख राजीव लोचन अरुन तन सोनित कनी॥
भुज जुगल फेरत सर सरासन भालु कपि चहु दिसि बने।
कह दास तुलसी कहि न सक छबि सेष जेहि आनन घने॥
1/3
See here. The original Vishwanath temple (Jyotirlinga) was at a place now called Adi Viswanath (circled in red). This was demolished by Kutubuddin Aibak (or Ghori, not sure) between 1192-98. Then it was moved to where Gyanwapi mosque is now(in green). google.com/maps/search/aa…