You know the reality of why you said that. Ask yourself honestly with a hand on your heart. As I said, your "Aoukaat" is to wash the bum (in the form of doing Swastivachan) of anyone who can throw some coins.
Effing मोहपातर!!
Dora's Arse Wiper tried hitting 2 birds (( i) Mocking Shiva's temple per his Madhwaite beliefs and (ii) cursing Modi for rejecting Swastivachan offer and not throwing coins) with one stone hiding behind this post-facto lame excuse and thought nobody will notice it.
Even someone with the head in his arse will know that BJP is the least harmful (if not pro Hindu as Trads say) to Hindu interests. Because any party who has Muslim vote as its power base, it can offer you "Revadi and Malayi" but it can't offer anything+ 1/
on civilizational agenda. So if you think as a Hindu, BJP is all that we have got at the moment. If you want a better alternative than BJP to emerge then there is no option but to keep supporting BJP.
But in "Trads" ko Malayi Khane ke alawa aur kuch soojhta nahin hai.
2/
To jiski hawa chale usi ke according garb bana lo aur Malayi Khao. Jab Nehru Ji ke Sekoolarism ke time pe Sekoolar ban jao aur RSS-BJP ke Bhagwa ke time par "Trad" ban jao aur Malayi Khao. Kal kisne dekha Hai.
3/3
New explanation. If someone built a resort mimicking temple, he will start calling a temple resort out of his frustration of Modi-RSS-BJP not throwing some bone like his Dora Nabab.
Identify the greed, as the source of frustration and anger that you vent out daily on your TL by calling Sanghis spoon. Don't pretend that you abuse RSS-BJP-Modi out of your care for Hindu Dharma. You are ineligible for it.
That's fine. You can swear at me. A Brahmin swearing at me doesn't bother me. But stop being a श्रुतिबेचक for few coins and that too from Vidharmis. I don't mind you earning money from Vidharmis by doing honest work.
The same applies to Gandhi and Sri Rama too but your Trad Khujli will never kick in because it doesn't serve your Congressi agenda of widening the Savarna and OBC-SC fault line.
Tulsidas didn't start any new school like post 1000AD Vaishnavacharyas. His tradition is the same as that of Veda Vyasaya, Sukdeva, Yagnavalkya ie श्रौत-स्मार्त tradition which existed before the advent of post 1000AD Vaishnavism. He states it by "नानापुराणनिगमागमसम्मतं यद्...."
I quote Tulsidas not because I like him. I like him because he never deviates from श्रुति मार्ग of Veda Vyasa, Sukdeva, and other ancient Vedic sages. The same can't be said about post 1000AD Vaishnavacharyas.
Maybe but the fact remains that paramAtma Hari in his ultimate form (तत्वत:) is
"वदन्ति तत्तत्त्वविदस्तत्त्वं यज्ज्ञानमद्वयम्।
ब्रह्मेति परमात्मेति भगवानिति शब्द्यते" ~ श्रीमद्भागवतम् १।२।११
Exactly!! You see the continuity of श्रीमद्भागवत in Ramcharitmanas when Tulsidas writes "सेवक स्वामि सखा सिय पी के।" (जो(शिव) सीतापति श्री रामचन्द्रजी के सेवक, स्वामी और सखा हैं) for Mahadeva. You find this missing in post 1000AD Vaishnava Sampradayas.
भावार्थ:-विनती करके सब देवता चले गए। उसी समय देवर्षि नारद आए।आकाश के ऊपर से उन्होंने श्री हरि के सुंदर वीर रसयुक्त गुण समूह का गान किया, जो प्रभु के मन को बहुत ही भाया। मुनि यह कहकर चले गए कि अब दुष्ट रावण को शीघ्र मारिए। (उस समय) श्री रामचंद्रजी रणभूमि में आकर सुशोभित हुए।
2/2
क्या गाँधी के राम ऐसे हो सकते हैं जिनके शरीर पर वध किये गये आततायियों के खून के छींटे हों?😊
संग्राम भूमि बिराज रघुपति अतुल बल कोसल धनी।
श्रम बिंदु मुख राजीव लोचन अरुन तन सोनित कनी॥
भुज जुगल फेरत सर सरासन भालु कपि चहु दिसि बने।
कह दास तुलसी कहि न सक छबि सेष जेहि आनन घने॥
1/3