Maybe but the fact remains that paramAtma Hari in his ultimate form (तत्वत:) is
"वदन्ति तत्तत्त्वविदस्तत्त्वं यज्ज्ञानमद्वयम्।
ब्रह्मेति परमात्मेति भगवानिति शब्द्यते" ~ श्रीमद्भागवतम् १।२।११
अगर भक्तों के लिए वह (दिव्य) लीला विग्रह धारण करते हैं तो यह कहाँ लिखा है कि वह केवल चार हाथ वाले विष्णु ही बनते हैं और पाँच मुख वाले शिव नही बनते (या हाथी के मुख वाला नही बनते या शेर की पीठ पर बैठने वाली नही बनते)?
5/6
The root cause, IMO, of the Shaiva-Vaishnava fight in South India is the attempt by post 1000AD Vaishnava Sampradayas of claiming and establishing relative truth (of Upasana Kanda of Vedas) of Vishnu being supreme as absolute truth of Gyana Kanda (Upanishad/Vedanat).
6/6
I thought you knew Sanskrit. I am not a Sanskrit expert.
Hindi translation from Gitapress.(व्यासजी ने कोई रास्ता नही छोडा़ "द्वैत-वेदान्तियों" के लिये।)😊
"तत्ववेत्तालोग ज्ञाता और ज्ञेयके भेदसे रहित अखण्ड अद्वितीय ज्ञानको ही तत्व कहते हैं उसीको कोई ब्रह्म,कोई परमात्मा और कोई भगवान के नाम से पुकारते हैं." 1/2
You know the reality of why you said that. Ask yourself honestly with a hand on your heart. As I said, your "Aoukaat" is to wash the bum (in the form of doing Swastivachan) of anyone who can throw some coins.
Effing मोहपातर!!
Dora's Arse Wiper tried hitting 2 birds (( i) Mocking Shiva's temple per his Madhwaite beliefs and (ii) cursing Modi for rejecting Swastivachan offer and not throwing coins) with one stone hiding behind this post-facto lame excuse and thought nobody will notice it.
Even someone with the head in his arse will know that BJP is the least harmful (if not pro Hindu as Trads say) to Hindu interests. Because any party who has Muslim vote as its power base, it can offer you "Revadi and Malayi" but it can't offer anything+ 1/
Tulsidas didn't start any new school like post 1000AD Vaishnavacharyas. His tradition is the same as that of Veda Vyasaya, Sukdeva, Yagnavalkya ie श्रौत-स्मार्त tradition which existed before the advent of post 1000AD Vaishnavism. He states it by "नानापुराणनिगमागमसम्मतं यद्...."
I quote Tulsidas not because I like him. I like him because he never deviates from श्रुति मार्ग of Veda Vyasa, Sukdeva, and other ancient Vedic sages. The same can't be said about post 1000AD Vaishnavacharyas.
Exactly!! You see the continuity of श्रीमद्भागवत in Ramcharitmanas when Tulsidas writes "सेवक स्वामि सखा सिय पी के।" (जो(शिव) सीतापति श्री रामचन्द्रजी के सेवक, स्वामी और सखा हैं) for Mahadeva. You find this missing in post 1000AD Vaishnava Sampradayas.
भावार्थ:-विनती करके सब देवता चले गए। उसी समय देवर्षि नारद आए।आकाश के ऊपर से उन्होंने श्री हरि के सुंदर वीर रसयुक्त गुण समूह का गान किया, जो प्रभु के मन को बहुत ही भाया। मुनि यह कहकर चले गए कि अब दुष्ट रावण को शीघ्र मारिए। (उस समय) श्री रामचंद्रजी रणभूमि में आकर सुशोभित हुए।
2/2
क्या गाँधी के राम ऐसे हो सकते हैं जिनके शरीर पर वध किये गये आततायियों के खून के छींटे हों?😊
संग्राम भूमि बिराज रघुपति अतुल बल कोसल धनी।
श्रम बिंदु मुख राजीव लोचन अरुन तन सोनित कनी॥
भुज जुगल फेरत सर सरासन भालु कपि चहु दिसि बने।
कह दास तुलसी कहि न सक छबि सेष जेहि आनन घने॥
1/3
See here. The original Vishwanath temple (Jyotirlinga) was at a place now called Adi Viswanath (circled in red). This was demolished by Kutubuddin Aibak (or Ghori, not sure) between 1192-98. Then it was moved to where Gyanwapi mosque is now(in green). google.com/maps/search/aa…