Yes, I’m sure these reckless gun owners who also happen to be Trump-supporting Republicans will finally face justice after a protracted and heavily-publicized court case oh, wait
https://twitter.com/slmckinnis/status/1467049223585734660
Well, this is clearly different from the Rittenhouse case, because their guilt seems extremely obvious to laypeople oh, wait
I mean, what are the odds that repulsive white people will be sprung on a technicality yet AGAIN, that simply isn’t how justice works in America oh, wait
Just curious: do NRA partisans REALLY believe in holding parents responsible when their children commit crimes with guns? Or do they see that as a slippery slope to the horrors of gun restriction?
For those who suspect I’m losing my grip on reality: I’m just looking for where the line is. I’m trying to figure out the precise point of demarcation where the NRA acknowledges that white gun owners have done something wrong.
A 17-year-old brought an AR-15 to a public gathering and shot two people with it, and that was justified as “self defense” by gun activists. So clearly, that’s not it.
That isn’t common sense. That’s manipulation of the system to advance an agenda.
That isn’t common sense. That’s manipulation of the system to advance an agenda.
If a white teenager carries a deadly weapon into a crowded protest, which party is more justified in feeling threatened?
Your answer says a lot about where you stand in our current ideological divide.
Is the gun-toting teen more of a threat, or the protesters?
Your answer says a lot about where you stand in our current ideological divide.
Is the gun-toting teen more of a threat, or the protesters?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
