@Debunk_the_Funk, the paper by Wölfel, Drosten et al. used different mechanism to detect the viruses. Lee´s point is that in Sanger sequencing you can not find the primer sequences.
@Debunk_the_Funk Lee was right in that the primer is not include in Sanger sequencing. Apparentky, you did not know that and confused him by pretending it shows up after sequencing.
@Debunk_the_Funk Lee is also right that the Chinese changed the Wuhan WT sequence; they did not report a second sequence or mutant. They simply changed the genome of the first reported. Further, It´s required to do Sanger sequencing to confirm all 29 tausendsomething nucleotides.
@Debunk_the_Funk Lee, like many others, simply wants to see proof that the amplicon really contains covid-sequences and that is not done in 99% of all positive PCR tests.
@Debunk_the_Funk you need to sequence the amplicon, not the sample to make sure the virus was amplified.
And indeed only samples positive after <20 cycles should be sequenced. There must be a world wide SOP to detect the virus and stop the PCR-demic.
@Debunk_the_Funk The paper by Tartof et al...of course a positive nested PCR is positive. It is such important paper, it really should be confirmed by sequencing.
@Debunk_the_Funk Sequencing a sample with a Ct >27 has low levels of RNA, you say, and if it gives false sequences after sequencing... Then they are false positives, as Lee said. You say: No, they are not. Are you deliberately upsetting Dr Lee by by confusing him?
@Debunk_the_Funk the conversation is now becoming an interrogation. Lee does not claim it to be fake data. He says he does not know the % of false positives. Here you can calculate the percentage false positives. researchgate.net/publication/34…
@Debunk_the_Funk I now understand you are advocating mass PCR Testing. So, we will be forever in PCR-demic. We will never return to normal.
@Debunk_the_Funk, I kept listening. Lee did not provide misinformation. He discussed his own papers, you did not debunk them.
If PCR is not detecting infectious virus, where do you set your Ct for infected and uninfected? And you talk about RNA levels, but the test is not quantitative.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The FDA requires a minimum of 50% efficacy for a vaccine to be approved.
Some facts:
1) In Provincetown, Massachusetts, there
were 1,098 known outbreak cases of COVID-19 after the July 4th weekend. The county encompassing Provincetown has a 68% full vaccination rate (Ref 1),...
...and yet, 74% of cases were in
fully vaccinated individuals, of whom 79% were symptomatic. Most importantly, when genetic sequencing was performed, it was found that 84% of the transmission came from fully
vaccinated individuals. (Ref 2)
...
2) In May 2021, there was an outbreak from an index patient with COVID-19 causing infection among healthcare workers in Finland. Only 3% of those who acquired COVID-19 from this index patient were unvaccinated, whereas 83% of them were fully vaccinated and ...
Heeft ook iemand van de sceptici zin om Dr. Ted van Essen, die ook alle kinderen wil vaccineren, na te zoeken. Ik kan namelijk nergens een proefschrift van hem vinden. @pjvanerp@aliettejonkers ? Of anders uw vriend Klaas van Dijk.
Let wel, beste mensen, er is geen enkel RNA of DNA vaccin veilig. En gecombineerd met het Spike-eiwit zijn het potentiele gevaarlijke toxines, die dezelfde of ergere effecten kunnen hebben als SARS-CoV zelf.
Ik wist dat sinds pharmaffia ermee begon. En met mij waren er nog duizenden wetenschappers die dat wisten, maar die de mond werden gesnoerd.
Pseudowetenschappende pharmaffia en scientisme-aanhangende MSM is slecht voor de mensheid.
Iedereen die mijn artikel wil ontvangen over hoe gevaarlijk RNA en DNA vaccins zijn kunnen me een email sturen, dan krijgen ze het van mij toegestuurd: peterborger@hotmail.com
From our site: "Misdiagnosis of PCR positives as infections has a history of causing ‘Casedemics’ which are typically characterized by an incongruity between positive PCR test results and deaths. A fairly recent example was the Swine flu outbreak of 2009 [3];"
STOP TESTING NOW!
If you you are really scientists, you should now advice against PCR testing so we can stop the PCR-demia.
Er zijn mensen die nu al de self-amplifying mRNA vaccins (sams) promoten, terwijl de eerste generatie RNA vaccins (Pfizer/Biontech en Moderna) nog niet eens zijn getest op lange termijn bijwerkingen.
Wat zijn sams? -->RNA vaccins die zichzelf in uw cellen vermenigvuldigen.
Sams zijn genetisch gemodificeerde RNA moleculen, die een viraal eiwit aan kunnen maken, waarop uw immuunsysteem dan met een antilichaam response reageert. Net als bij de eerste generatie RNA vaccins, dus.
Het verschil is echter dat er nog een stukje extra...
...viraal RNA aan wordt toegevoegd. Dit extra stukje bevat een een genetische schakelaar, een zogenaamde promotor. Deze promotor is de aanschakelaar van het virale RNA en zorgt ervoor dat er voortdurend viraal RNA in uw cellen wordt aangemaakt. Er is geen uitschakelaar.