This is a Twitter Summary hitting the main points.
For my full argument, see the transcript or video.
As a shorthand, I use “the left” to refer to all people left of the right-wing extremists who want democracy to survive.
2/
The lies we see on the right-wing are intended to destroy.
Here is what people on the left seem to have a hard time accepting: The Republicans are knowingly and actively shielding and supporting liars and lawbreakers because they want to destroy.
3/
Anti-government rhetoric has long been part of the Republican lexicon.
in 2001, Grover Norquist said, “I don’t want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.”
4/
The insurrection is really just an extension of the idea that we should drown the federal government.
That’s why the Republican Party is trying to minimize and downplay the insurrection.
5/
If you expect that to change, if you think indictments or convictions or the results of investigations will break through to a party immune to the truth, you will be disappointed.
Unfortunately, for reasons I explain, it could be as high as 45% of the voters in that group.
6/
Because the Republican Party has abandoned truth, our only hope is for the left to embrace truth.
The truth is nuanced. It's complex. It doesn't fit well into a soundbite.
It's easy to fire off untruths.
Responding with facts is much harder.
That's how the truth loses.
7/
Because so many people are immune to truth, the only chance to beat authoritarianism is for everyone else to join together.
Instead, the left has formed a circular firing squad driven at least partly by simplifications.
8/
Simplifications take a complex situation and boil it down to something that seems true and perhaps has some truth in it, but is not true.
Often they are literally not true. Or they ignore the complexity of a situation and thus misrepresent reality.
9/
In the video, I address a few simplifications and why they are problematic.
I won't go into the details here.
I was feeling like I was drowning in a sea of “There are never any consequences” and “Merrick Garland is corrupt” when I listened to Snyder's latest video.
10/
Me, listening to the video = 💡the light came on.
Everyone should listen to it.
He talks about "Internet Triggers," which he defines as something a person ses on the Internet, felt triggered by, and then repeats.
11/
Snyder talked about why these Internet Triggers are dangerous for democracy: They prevent us from thinking complex thoughts.
People see these Triggers on the Internet because they are directed at them.
The people are then transformed into repeaters of targeted memes.
12/
Snyder finds this terrifying because democracy depends on us having “some sense of time beyond our immediate outrage.”
Snyder also talks about how, in Orwell’s 1984, the fictionalized totalitarian government worked on reducing the number of words in the language.
13/
Having each of us become repeaters of Internet Triggers accomplishes the same thing by reducing our ability to have complex thoughts.
In the video, I talk about how these simplifications actually put Teflon on Trump, which means that the Left is putting Teflon on Trump.
14/
For what I mean by the left putting Teflon on Trump, see:
The left is minimizing and ignoring facts and instead, is sinking into a mire of speculation, and conclusions based on speculation.
15/
I fully understand the dangers posed by right-wing extremism.
I suggest that the left hasn't yet figured out how to respond to these kinds of threats to democracy.
Democracy is the form of government based on rule of law, which requires truth and a shared factuality. . .
16/
Because the Republican Party has abandoned truth, our only hope is for the left to embrace truth.
That means at least slowing the tide of rage-inducing Internet Triggers, pausing to absorb the complexity of our current politics, and embracing nuance.
17/
l'll phrase it differently:
If someone (1) prefers democracy and (2) doesn't understand the dangers posed by the modern Trump-GOP, rage-doom tweeting won't help.
Moreover, if those are the people you are trying to reach . . .
Isn't "we should have an attack dog as AG" something Trump would say?
Maybe (hear me out) people got so used to Trump-style politics that they're continuing Trump-style and that might turn off people who don't like Trump-style politics.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If they say: "The United States was not founded as a democracy," I say, "That's because we had legalized slavery."
Ha! I usually ignore the comment myself because you know exactly who you are dealing with. They're the same people who think the IRS and the SEC are unconstitutional.
But people feel better when they know how to answer.
One way to counter the anti-Merrick Garland rage is with facts (here is how complex investigations work, here's the evidence we have of what is happening).
Another way perhaps is to ask: If a president removed an AG because of a pressure campaign by political partisans. . .
. . . who are demanding specific prosecutions, wouldn't that itself be politicizing the DOJ, which is exactly what Barr and Trump tried to do, which we all agreed was destructive to democracy?
Garland continually answers his critics by saying "They will follow the facts."
2/
One of the pillars of democracy is an independent prosecutor. In an autocracy, the autocrat decides. In an era of mob rule (i.e. lynchings) the mob decides.
As our democracy is set up, the prosecutor decides.
3/
Here is what people are having a hard time accepting:
The Republicans are knowingly and actively shielding and supporting liars and lawbreakers because they want to destroy. The lies and lawbreaking are intended to destroy.
If anyone made these promises, that person lied⤵️
1/
It seems to me that this is based on a theory that goes like this: We had a lovely democracy and then along came the lawbreaking Republicans. Because they are breaking laws, we can solve the problem through the criminal justice system.
2/
Two things are happening right now on left media:
(1) People misunderstand the lies and lawbreaking on the right.
(2) People tell their own lies (what I've been calling rage-inducing simplifications) based on a faulty view of history and the nature of the problem.
3/