A reminder that every reactionary movement, in working itself up to violence, starts by convincing itself that its opponents -- the immigrants, intellectuals, & elites -- are a giant monolithic force that is right on the verge of destroying civilization. It's well-worn script.
I was just listening to a podcast about McCarthyism the other day & his rhetoric was practically identical to what you hear today. The commies are everywhere, right on the verge of taking over! They're all in league w/ one another! We have no time to worry about civil liberties!
You see it in the evolution of Proud Boys rhetoric too. First it was about "being ready" for when the left launched its inevitable purge. Then people get guns, get fired up, get tired of waiting, & the rhetoric shifts to "we can't afford to wait, we must preemptively strike!"
This what the "Flight 93 election" nonsense is all about -- the left is right on the verge of total victory, so *anything* is justified in preventing it, even voter suppression & cheating. The dynamic, the mentality, is the same every time.
Working themselves up into a froth about an all-powerful enemy that wants to destroy their civilization is just a collective way for reactionary movements to give themselves moral permission to indulge in their worst impulses toward cruelty & violence. They "have no choice."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Roberts

David Roberts Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @drvolts

6 Dec
Today's thread on the impending demise of US democracy.

Start with this absolutely essential piece from @bartongellman. As he convincingly argues, Trump successfully stealing the 2024 election is not just possible, it's currently the likely outcome. theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…
Here's @DavidOAtkins arguing that Dems need to be thinking about "break the glass" emergency measures (though he doesn't say what those are?): washingtonmonthly.com/2021/12/04/sav…
Here's election expert @LauraLThornton arguing that, if Wisconsin were a separate country, we would no longer view it as a democracy. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 5 tweets
5 Dec
This is really good -- both in identifying how toxic & absurd Hawley's offering is & in identifying the lack of any clear non-toxic alternative models for men.
Here's a question for you all: who is modeling the kind of masculinity you would like to see more of? Who strikes you as a "real man" but in a *good* way?
The good men list so far (at least two votes):
Keanu Reeves
Dave Grohl
B. Obama
Steve Kerr
Nick Offerman
Jose Andres
Guy Fieri
Stephen Colbert
Tom Hanks
Levar Burton
George Clooney
Read 5 tweets
3 Dec
Everyone on the internet has already told you to read @RottenInDenmark's excellent dissection of the "evidence" the Cancel Culture Cult uses to justify its hysteria. But I'm gonna tell you again anyway: read it. michaelhobbes.substack.com/p/students-sel…
Over time I've noticed that there are certain specific issues that cause normally sober, reasonable analysts to indulge in obvious motivated reasoning. And on some level I think they're aware because they also get very huffy & defensive about those issues. Of course ...
... this kind of thing is easy to see from the outside but difficult to see from inside. I'm sure there are issues about which I'm the same way! But some issues seem to really invite it. I would include Israel (which I'm not gonna touch). Meat eating. Cars. But ...
Read 6 tweets
29 Nov
One of the most pernicious aspects of political commentary is how much it relies on polls & surveys that give people a list of options & ask which they care about or believe. It gives the impression that the mass of voters are out there knowing things & worrying over "issues."
In fact, anyone who looks into it closely finds basically the same thing: voters don't know anything. They have all kinds of wacky & weird beliefs. They don't necessarily care about -- can't even necessarily identify -- "issues" as political types think about them.
So, so, so much of political commentary is DC/NYC political obsessives retconning voter behavior to render it a rational, or at least legible, response to actual facts & circumstances. It's like a fun pattern-finding game they all play together.
Read 10 tweets
28 Nov
Oman produces 1M barrels of oil a day. Now it's setting out on a full-bore transition to a hydrogen economy -- hopes to produce 10GW of green hydrogen a year by 2030, 30GW a year by 2040. zawya.com/mena/en/story/…
Interesting note on that story: "as a country, we are anticipating shortfalls in our gas supply (which necessitates an early transition to alternatives)."

I suspect all the agita around natural gas supply/prices recently is going to turbo-charge hydrogen plans.
Green hydrogen will used to make eMethanol, which can be used to power freight ships. That's starting to happen too: liquidwind.se/news/liquidwin…
Read 5 tweets
25 Nov
OK, last night I watched the latest Bond movie. It was pretty good -- the best one in a while, IMO, with real emotional stakes -- but there was one choice in it that utterly baffled me. Maybe I missed something? Short thread.
When the movie begins, Bond is retired. He gets pulled back in (of course) & in the process meets ... the new 007! She's a young black woman, a total badass, & the highlight of the movie. Lots of zingy banter between her & Bond. Great stuff.
At that point I was thinking, "ah, sweet, they've elegantly solved the problem of who's going to take over for Daniel Craig. It works perfectly in the movie & she's a great choice." (I have not followed Bond discourse at all, obv.)
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(