The Accommodation Is The Supremacy

Republicans are killing their own constituents by the thousands, and their constituents love them for it. Wondering why?

Look to the swimming pools.

getrevue.co/profile/julius…
In the 1950s and 60s, municipalities started to integrate their public swimming pools, in part due to legal mandates, in part because of the fact that segregation is cruel and unjust, and people have always known that, no matter what people say now about “a different time.”
So, municipalities—whether voluntarily or not—made public spaces available to everybody. A simple thing. A good thing. The right thing.

What happened was this: white people violently rioted.
"On June 21, two hundred white residents surrounded the pool with “bats, clubs, bricks and knives” to menace the first thirty or so Black swimmers. Over the course of the day, a white mob that grew to five thousand attacked every Black person in sight."

marketplace.org/2021/02/15/pub…
What happened after that was this: municipalities closed the swimming pools.

It was a choice.
Cities could have left the pools open. But they didn’t, because the cities were oriented to accommodate the psychological and physical comfort of white people, even if what the white people wanted was morally indefensible, and clearly made things worse.
We could use a word for that phrase: “when cities accommodate one group over another, even if the preferred group’s preference is for harm.”

How about this word: supremacy.
I want you to pay attention to an important distinction; it’s one that’s usually purposefully missed.

The violent white people were supremacists, but the violence of the white people wasn’t the supremacy.
The decision of people with the power to accommodate them anyway—that was the supremacy.

The accommodation is the supremacy.

The accommodation is the supremacy.
So, because of the supremacy of white people, public swimming pools withered and closed—and not just pools. We could be talking about schools. We could be talking about many things. Because of the supremacy, they withered and closed.
I’m thinking about the swimming pools today because elected Republican officials are killing thousands of their own constituents, and doing so seems to be a prerequisite for these officials, if they want to retain the loyalty of the people they’re killing, and I'm curious why.
Dying from the virus has become optional. A large and vocal mostly white conservative minority is exercising that option.

And the question you might be asking is: why?
Why does this large and mostly white conservative minority want to spread a deadly virus? Why are they willing to sacrifice knowable reality and even their own lives and the lives of their loved ones in order to accomplish this?

My guess is, it’s the swimming pool.
But I think "why do conservatives want to spread Covid even though it collapses our shared society?" is the wrong question.

The right question is:

"What is it about the total collapse of our shared society that conservatives now want?"

I think the answer is the "shared" part.
It’s the same reason they no longer participate in our shared reality.

They don’t want to share.

I think they want the system to collapse.

Anyway, whatever their intention, it’s certainly what they’re doing.
They are supremacist.

Our political and social systems still accommodate their desires.

And so, to one extent or another, do most of us.

Which is the supremacy.
The remedy, in my opinion, is an uncomfortable one. To the extent that we do, we all have to stop participating in supremacy.

At all.
Anywhere.

Which means we’ll have to become people who refuse to accommodate it, and are willing to accept the discomfort that comes with it.
A large and vocal mostly white minority is willing to fight for their supremacy, and they’ll pay for it with their lives if they must. It’s why they get their way. It’s why we accommodate them.
They’ll cement over our shared society, if we let them—and we’re letting them. We’re accommodating them.

I’d say it’s time for us to take their supremacy and cement that over, instead.
You want a society of equality? Good. Me too.

We need to be willing to fight for it—and to pay the cost of the fight.

Or we’ll pay the steeper cost of accommodation.

/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with A.R. (Actually Republic) Moxon

A.R. (Actually Republic) Moxon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JuliusGoat

5 Dec
The fascist, white supremacist political party Republican that works nearby is trying to end abortion rights, marriage equality, the struggle against institutionalized racism and poverty, and any hope of an equal, pluralistic modern society.
You can laugh at these pathetic men, and probably you should, but you should also realize that the most powerful political party in our country, seemingly able to control public policy in or out of power, with 35%-40% support, acts primarily to support their point of view.
Here's what I want people to understand about the marching Nazis:

They believe society is the preferential property of white people above all others. They are supremacists.

Our political and social systems are oriented to accommodate their point of view.

That is the supremacy.
Read 7 tweets
4 Dec
white conservatives think that what the 2nd amendment guarantees is not just the right for white people to bear arms, but the inviolable right for white people to be *presumed safe* while bearing arms, by both civilians and authorities, both before and after any killings
The suspect is a male, age 21 years, armed with several rifles and at least one handgun. Seven are dead, three others injured; authorities seek the gunman to find out if he is white, and, if so, what the dead did to deserve it, or perhaps how bad of a day he was having.
And yet so many 2nd amendment people are currently trying to overthrow the constitution, and shooting and threatening to shoot Black Lives Matter and other protesters who demand we followed it for the first time in the nation's history, it's weird.
Read 15 tweets
3 Dec
Our current situation is: Republicans are actively doing harm to US citizens, partly for political advantage, partly for profit, partly because they want people harmed.

Many others would rather protect the rules and systems that allow this, than subvert those rules to fight it.
This is from my hometown, about the place where my wife works, and I encourage you to read it.

It describes a war zone.

The war is being waged by a political party acting to spread a virus and suppress all remedy.

They can do this because our system is designed to let them.
Our governor, a Democrat, took responsible & extraordinary precautions at the start of this pandemic, for which she was ritually attacked by the Republican president & her gerrymandered Rep. state legislature, & faced violent threat, plotting, & actions from Rep. voters.
Read 10 tweets
1 Dec
Sometimes a tweet comes along that perfectly encapsulates the writer's entire worldview, and folks,
If you'd do unethical shit to help out your brother if he's embroiled in scandal, you'd do unethical shit to help out your brother if he's not embroiled in scandal.

Not even knowing that a completely situational morality isn't something to proudly proclaim? That's our MattY!
"Before you go judging Andrew Cuomo for unethically using his media role to spread misinformation about the abusive practices of his brother, the Governor of New York, keep in mind he had a SERIOUS conflict of interests."

Is not a defense. Thinking it is? Yikes.
Read 4 tweets
25 Nov
I'm right here, Josh. I never left.
Nothing less manly than endlessly worrying over what is manly and what isn't, in my opinion.

Manly men are just manly, and that encompasses an extremely wide spectrum of appearance and behavior.
Idea: Hawley's mistake is an insistence that "manly" and "womanly" are opposites.

They aren't. A man isn't less manly for having qualities considered "feminine."

What if being unmanly just means being insecure about maleness? What if the idea of "real men" is an unmanly idea?
Read 5 tweets
25 Nov
The downtown hospital in my MI city is getting National Guard medical to help deal with a massive surge of ~95% unvaxxed Covid patients—and all I can think is next time we have a Republican governor that won't happen b/c fighting deadly diseases is a partisan issue now.
The great idea of the Republican Party is that government is always bad, and therefore government will always fail ... which led them to strategically try to make government always fail ... which led, eventually, inevitably, to this.

It's a civic murder/suicide pact.
The idea of government preventing a million deaths is, apparently, a more terrible outcome to conservative politicians and the majority of their voters than is a million preventable deaths.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(