I'm right here, Josh. I never left. 
Nothing less manly than endlessly worrying over what is manly and what isn't, in my opinion.
Manly men are just manly, and that encompasses an extremely wide spectrum of appearance and behavior.
Manly men are just manly, and that encompasses an extremely wide spectrum of appearance and behavior.
Idea: Hawley's mistake is an insistence that "manly" and "womanly" are opposites.
They aren't. A man isn't less manly for having qualities considered "feminine."
What if being unmanly just means being insecure about maleness? What if the idea of "real men" is an unmanly idea?
They aren't. A man isn't less manly for having qualities considered "feminine."
What if being unmanly just means being insecure about maleness? What if the idea of "real men" is an unmanly idea?
You can look and act just like Josh Hawley and be perfectly manly, save for his insecure proscribing of maleness into narrower and narrower categories of behavior, categories which he himself seems unable to adequately perform.
That unnecessary shit isn't manly, Josh.
That unnecessary shit isn't manly, Josh.
Trans men, for example, are so manly they're willing to fight an entire hostile society just to announce their maleness, for their whole lives if necessary. Some pretty manly shit if you ask me. Impressive level of confidence in maleness.
Josh Hawley wishes he was that manly.
Josh Hawley wishes he was that manly.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
