The downtown hospital in my MI city is getting National Guard medical to help deal with a massive surge of ~95% unvaxxed Covid patients—and all I can think is next time we have a Republican governor that won't happen b/c fighting deadly diseases is a partisan issue now.
The great idea of the Republican Party is that government is always bad, and therefore government will always fail ... which led them to strategically try to make government always fail ... which led, eventually, inevitably, to this.
It's a civic murder/suicide pact.
The idea of government preventing a million deaths is, apparently, a more terrible outcome to conservative politicians and the majority of their voters than is a million preventable deaths.
Ideas can act like viruses.
The idea that government is always bad is an idea that reduces to the idea "there is no society."
The idea that there is no society is a viral one, and Covid denialism is its latest strain—a deadly one.
They're not against the vaccine because drug companies profit. After all, conservatives also oppose and vote against drug price regulation currently on proposal.
They're antivax because the government provides it.
They oppose not because it is expensive, but because it's free.
And even the "sane rational conservatives" not actively in favor of a million deaths won't stop voting for politicians who will refuse to prevent the million deaths, because the "sane rational conservatives" have contracted the idea that government is always the problem.
Want conservatives to support the vaccine? Make it too expensive for poor people to get, so conservatives can feel it's something only good people earn, They'll then organize programs to provide it to only the poor people they personally feel have proved themselves deserving.
And sure then a million preventable deaths will still occur, but conservatives will have control over *which* deaths, and the vaccine will stop being such an issue for them.
A government-based solution to a problem? They'd rather die—and take as many of us with them as possible.
Think I'm being uncharitable? Maybe.
Not sure why we'd assume *charitable* reasons for a movement actively working to spread a deadly virus and actively working against the spread of the vaccine, but if you want to find one, be my guest.
I'm just going off what they do and say.
I think it's unacceptable that the rest of us have to exist with this knowledge of so many people in our communities who'd rather kill and die than give up their sense of control over the fate of their fellow humans.
I think it's unacceptable—and I think it's OK to say that.
I particularly find it unacceptable that these people—mostly conservative, mostly white—are systemically given such outsize actual control, and that the distress they feel when we propose taking that control away is treated as trauma equivalent to the deaths of their victims.
The people least concerned with the lives of others are given the most control over the lives of others, as a deliberate foundational feature of our country's political system.
That system has to change. If that makes you uncomfortable, best to examine within yourself why.
I'm not particularly worried about dealing with any conservatives in my family this holiday season.
I'm more interested in becoming the person they're worried about dealing with.
I have no interest in entertaining unacceptable ideas. I think that's OK.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You know, reading back through this, it almost seems like some people are willing to spend more money to have a class of unhoused people than it would cost to simply house everyone, specifically to have a pretext for opposing public works projects that would benefit all, weird.
Whenever I write something that critiques systemic injustice, people who defend systemic injustice appear to rebut me ... by making the exact points I made.
But there's never been anything I've written that has demonstrated this effect as much as this.
But by beating Republicans in elections don’t Democrats risk losing the very centrist swing voters whose support they’ll need to win the next elections?
This is why I, a senior Republican election strategist providing Democrats with election strategy in the paper of record, strongly recommend that Democrats lose all their elections; if they insist on winning some elections, they’ll surely pay for it the next election cycle.
By losing all their elections, Democrats will send a clear signal that they are willing to compromise on the issues centrist voters value, such as whether or not Democrats should be allowed to win elections. Complete surrender is the only path that can carry Democrats to victory.
Earlier this year conservatives were fighting the Seuss estate for updating their racial awareness from 1950 and now they’re fighting Sesame Street over basic public health.
Like what even the fuck is wrong with them? Never mind the shitty policy. It’s so embarrassing.
The big tent party of small limited government going to war with Dora the Explorer because of her “woke” scolding of swipes, and burning their cardigan sweaters because Mr. Rogers asked us to be kind.