'Second, Pfizer can disallow governments from accepting additional donations of the Pfizer vaccine. ' 2/n
'Third, Pfizer exempts itself from liability for intellectual property infringements, shifting the financial risk of Pfizer’s actions to government purchasers – despite Pfizer’s opposition to similar exemptions for manufacturers proposed at the World Trade Organization. ' 3/n
'Fourth, it gives the power to secret private arbitrators, not public courts, to decide issues on contract disputes. '
'Fifth, Pfizer requires some countries to waive sovereign immunity, so it can go after state assets in case of a dispute. '
'Finally, Pfizer gives itself sole power when it comes to making key decisions, including how vaccine deliveries will be prioritized if there is a supply shortage.'
If these are general strategies, they are buttressed by the secrecy & redactions around the exact contract terms, inaccessible even to elected reps of the EU.
'"Pfizer wields its power to extract a series of concerning concessions from governments,” said Zain Rizvi, law & policy researcher at Public Citizen’s Access to Medicines program.... “The global community cannot allow pharmaceutical corporations to keep calling the shots.” '
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Vaccines Work - for Smallpox and Measles
'I hope I'm wrong this time, but I think by March, April, & May, we will have a fully vaccine-resistant variant..." according to Dr. Mark Dybul, an immunologist trained under Anthony Fauci.' thedesertreview.com/opinion/column… via @DesertReview
'...in terms of increased infections and a ticking up of hospitalizations and deaths, even among vaccinated people.'
' if we look at the countries that are not vaccinated, like Nigeria, we see something remarkable. Nigeria has just 14 deaths per million people, while the United States has 2366 deaths' per million.
'Whether you believe that this was all to bring about a Great Reset or some of the actors involved genuinely wanted to stop a virus, the result is now clear. The war on COVID-19 is over and it has resulted in colossal loss.' dossier.substack.com/p/the-war-on-a…
'They lost the war, they know they lost the war, and now the losing side of the war — the global “elite” — is attempting to cover up this reality by any means necessary, even if it means dragging the entirety of humanity down with them.'
So much made of the threat posed by non-compliant:
'The people did not fail the ruling class. Whether we like it or not, the people complied en masse. According to so many metrics, compliance with these...measures was off the charts.'
'Following...vaccine rollout, the UK’s Office of National Statistics shows that the # of deaths btw week 38 & week 41...among children aged 10-14 were 62% higher than the five-year average for the number of deaths in this age group during the same period.' rairfoundation.com/great-britain-…
'The government decided to go ahead with the injection program despite the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) previously stating that they could not support universal vaccination of children. '
The UK's Chief Medical Officers:
'The CMO admits they do not know the adverse effects the injection will have on children stating, we “acknowledge that there is considerable uncertainty regarding the magnitude of the potential harms.” '
Lancet:
'Breakthrough Delta variant infections following Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccination may cause asymptomatic or mild disease, but are associated with high viral loads, prolonged PCR positivity and low levels of vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies.' thelancet.com/journals/eclin…
'Epidemiological and sequence data suggested ongoing transmission had occurred between fully vaccinated individuals. '
'our study also showed no correlation between neutralizing antibody levels at diagnosis and the development of symptoms.'
People can always cherry-pick a study to throw mud on. One site updates daily the results of an ongoing IVM metananalysis. Wonder how the Merck meta-analysis stacks up with this, you know, as a basis for approval.
E.g., today: ivmmeta.com
This site is not anti-vcxx:
'Elimination of COVID-19 is a race against viral evolution. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available & effective for all variants. All practical, effective, & safe means should be used, including treatments, as supported by Pfizer...'
The site stresses that whatever the intervention--for prophylaxis, early treatment, symptom mitigation--be it IVM, Merck, Pfizer--
'Denying the efficacy of treatments increases the risk of COVID-19 becoming endemic; and increases mortality, morbidity, and collateral damage.'
This would only make sense--and would have been part of a massively resourced & intricately plotted and globally networked program of field research to (dis)confirm the 'safe & effective' hypothesis. You know, given an injection rate of a billion a month...
Instead, what seems just as likely will be enormous questions unasked, or arcanely structured to get a null result, and a non-pattern of paradoxical but painstakingly disconnected findings.
In this scenario we'll see multiple, large associations of doctors and scientists ignored or shaded by media & governments, such as the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
Except here we wouldn't be talking about 3000 deaths. #TooBigToProsecute