Watching this Sullivan fellow (late of Kabul infamy) brief the press on Biden-Putin discussion. Why is Biden, who spoke with Putin, not the one speaking to the press about what occurred? Even a Neville Chamberlain spoke to the crowds after Munich about 'peace in our time'.
Contrast with a year ago, when @generalkellogg advised the President, to this Sullivan fellow, who is a boy on a man's errand, is a stark one ..... the idea that the Russians (esp in Winter) fear the people who 'planned' the Afghan collapse & Kabul catastrophe is just farcical.
'President Putin was told in no uncertain terms that we will respond to him .... Also we gave him a gas pipeline to throttle the Germans with, esp in winter. The historic norms people are in charge"
The Russians see weakness & think that they can get both. The Germans particularly are not going to rupture a primary energy source (esp in Winter) when so much of the European energy market is in expensive chaos. And post Kabul...why be afraid?
https://twitter.com/JacquiHeinrich/status/1468313323003420675
It is Dec 2021 - it is hard to believe that we have another 3 years [at least] of the US President, who is the leader of a global security alliance, not being able to speak publicly for himself after a call with a Russian President, but instead using this callow Sullivan fellow.
The upshot of that briefing was .... what??? Biden and Putin spoke? Putin - who literally righted the Syrian AO with sheer brute force - has no fear of Biden who abandoned & left Kabul *with Taliban permission*.
No one in the Russian security apparatus has preferred pronouns.
No one in the Russian security apparatus has preferred pronouns.
You are in the Russian security apparatus - you were in Chechnya, Dagestan, Serbia (hush), The Stans, Georgia, Ukraine, Syria … and across the table from you are menshevik Americans who feel the need to clarify, daily, that their biological sex may not be their gender
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
