A lot of Trump fans weighing in about how Biden's not being tough enough with Putin.

Some of them appear to be older than 3.5 years, which is when this happened: Image
Of course there's this: Image
And this: Image
Remember when Trump took Putin's word over that of his own intelligence agencies?

Yeah. That happened.
Remember when Trump explained that the Soviets invaded Afghanistan way back when to root out terrorists?

That happened, too.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with S.V. Dáte

S.V. Dáte Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @svdate

7 Dec
1) Jan. 6 committee playing hardball with Meadows, following his change of heart about testifying.

2) Whoa. Lock him up? Image
For those who could not read the highlighted section, this is what it says:
"We also need to hear from him about voluminous official records stored in his personal phone and email accounts, which were required to be turned over to the National Archives in accordance with the Presidential Records Act."
Read 4 tweets
2 Dec
NEW -- Donald Trump knowingly put at risk the lives of Gold Star families, wealthy donors at a Minnesota fundraiser, then-Democratic nominee Joe Biden, White House staff, the crews of Air Force One, and others.

huffpost.com/entry/donald-t…
Sometimes its important to remember just how uniquely terrible a person the last president of the United States really was.
This was him:
Read 5 tweets
30 Nov
Trump's attempt to keep his involvement in the Jan. 6 insurrection a secret is being heard right now by a three-judge panel of the Circuit Court of Appeals, District of Columbia.

The judges seem ... skeptical of Trump's demands.

huffpost.com/entry/donald-t…
Trump's lawyers keep bringing up GSA v Nixon, which was superseded by the Presidential Records Act.
Trump's lawyers are still up, getting harshly grilled about why Trump's insistence that his records be kept secret should overrule Biden's determination that the national interest demands that they be released.

Yet to be seen how they treat the DOJ and House lawyers.
Read 9 tweets
18 Nov
NEW -- RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel today -- one year and 11 days after the 2020 presidential race was called for Joe Biden, refused to say that he had legitimately won the election, and instead insisted there were "problems" that needed to be looked into.

huffpost.com/entry/mcdaniel…
She also refused to say whether the reporting in Jon Karl's book, that Trump threatened to leave the Republican to create his own, was accurate.
She also refused to say whether the party and the RNC in particular has a responsibility to make sure their next nominee does not try to overthrow the republic, as Trump did after he lost.
Read 8 tweets
4 Nov
BTW, if Trump had been hoping for a judge likely to go along with his lies about Jan. 6 -- that it was really ANTIFA, that it was peaceful, that those arrested are being persecuted -- he must be disappointed.
Judge Tanya Chutkan has earned a reputation for seeing the Jan. 6 attack as a serious threat against the United States and has, at times, given harsher sentences to insurrectionists than those recommended by prosecutors.
“There have to be consequences for participating in an attempted violent overthrow of the government, beyond sitting at home,” she said in one case.
Read 4 tweets
4 Nov
NEW -- Trump went to federal court to keep his role in the Jan. 6 insurrection a secret.

At his first hearing today, the judge had ... questions.

huffpost.com/entry/trump-ja…
“Isn’t the best person to determine executive privilege the executive?” Judge Tanya Chutkan asked Trump lawyer Justin Clark.

Clark answered: “Not the incumbent executive.”
Trump’s lawyers had argued that a 1974 Supreme Court case regarding Richard Nixon’s attempt to have White House recordings he had made destroyed after he resigned from office gave Trump the right to assert privilege even if Biden refused to do so.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(