“Isn’t the best person to determine executive privilege the executive?” Judge Tanya Chutkan asked Trump lawyer Justin Clark.
Clark answered: “Not the incumbent executive.”
Trump’s lawyers had argued that a 1974 Supreme Court case regarding Richard Nixon’s attempt to have White House recordings he had made destroyed after he resigned from office gave Trump the right to assert privilege even if Biden refused to do so.
But Chutkan pointed out that Congress had superseded that case by passing the Presidential Records Act in 1978, which gives the sitting president the ultimate decision on whether to assert privilege.
“I’m not sure that case is as helpful to you as you think it is,” Chutkan told Clark. She added that Congress seemed to have a legitimate interest in finding out how the insurrection came to be. “The Jan. 6 riot happened in the Capitol. That is literally Congress’ house.”
Chutkan said she did agree with Trump’s lawyers on one point: that the committee’s requests for documents seemed “alarmingly broad,” asking for some records going back to April 2020, including polling data.
Douglas Letter, House general counsel, said that date was relevant because it was when Trump began falsely claiming in Twitter posts that the coming election would be rigged if he lost.
Chutkan, though, wondered whether trying to make sense of Trump’s tweets was a good use of time. “I’m not sure there is an answer about why the president was tweeting what he was tweeting,” she said.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BTW, if Trump had been hoping for a judge likely to go along with his lies about Jan. 6 -- that it was really ANTIFA, that it was peaceful, that those arrested are being persecuted -- he must be disappointed.
Judge Tanya Chutkan has earned a reputation for seeing the Jan. 6 attack as a serious threat against the United States and has, at times, given harsher sentences to insurrectionists than those recommended by prosecutors.
“There have to be consequences for participating in an attempted violent overthrow of the government, beyond sitting at home,” she said in one case.
CONTEXT: This was the guy who came up with the theory that Democrats encouraging Trump supporters to get vaccinated are actually using reverse psychology to make them NOT get vaccinated so they will, instead, get sick and die.
Also, if people disagree with him, he claims he is having sex with their mothers.
- Dems will talk up their spending bills, regardless of what's in them, as a huge step forward.
- Republicans will call the bills socialism, even as they take credit for local projects getting money.
- No one will remember or care about the process.
One year from now:
- If the economy is doing well and COVID is beaten/mostly beaten, Dems won't get completely clobbered in midterms.
- If COVID is still an issue and the economy is weak, Dems will get clobbered.
Three years from now:
- If the economy is doing okay, Biden will likely win re-election.
- If it's doing badly, he will likely lose.
Who is taking what Trump did between Nov. 3 and Jan. 6 seriously?
Liz Cheney.
Here are some comments from today's Rules Committee meeting to schedule tomorrow's resolution holding Steve Bannon in criminal contempt:
“The people who attacked this building told us, continue to tell us on video, on social media, and now before the federal courts, exactly what motivated them. They believed what Donald Trump said, that the election was stolen and that they needed to take action."
"At this moment, it is not just the institution of Congress' authority that is at stake, the potential harm to the foundation of our Republic is far more significant. In the past week, President Trump has openly urged millions of Republican voters not to vote in 2022 or 2024.