Expert critics are dead inside. People become experts in things they love, but by doing so, they lose their sense of joy: "Across seven studies... we found consistent evidence that expertise leads to emotional numbness"
Refocusing on your emotional reactions brings the joy back!
Basically this.
Here's the paper: academic.oup.com/jcr/article/48…. And anyone who wants to nitpick the data and methods should obviously instead refocus on the emotional highs that reading academic papers originally gave them 😜
Another way expertise makes you more of a bummer to be around: you can more easily see the flaws in ideas, rather then just being excited by their potential 👇
I am haunted by two papers on how much we hate hard thinking:
⚡️2/3 of men & 1/4 of women choose to shock themselves rather than sit & think for 6-15 minutes
🔥28% of people chose pain they rated as "extremely intense" for 20 seconds over spending 20 seconds solving a hard puzzle
In general, when bored & given a chance to think, we instead just turn evil. In preregistered studies of 7,000 people, boredom is linked to sadism. 18% of bored people killed worms (2% of non-bored), and bored parents & soldiers both act more sadistically! psyarxiv.com/r67xg/
It’s one reason why violent video games actually reduce crime - people are at home entertained versus out & bored.
Despite all of the speculation about how startups can now be located anywhere, Silicon Valley, New York City, and Boston received 66% of all VC 💰in the US in Q3, 2021. The exact same percentage as in 2017.
Austin & Miami each had less than 2% of VC 💰 (Philly beats them both!)
Also, just to show how geographically skewed VC funding remains: Boston startups alone raised about as much money in Q3, 2021 as EVERY venture-funded startup in France and Germany put together in the same period!
I love Boston, but France and Germany have even more smaht people.
This is not to suggest that places like Miami and Austin couldn't eventually rival established tech hubs (the world would be better with more thriving hubs) but the forces that keep Silicon Valley (& Boston & NYC) on top are powerful. Here are 7 of them 👇
Knowing true information can sometimes cause harm (think of the annoyance of seeing spoilers as a tiny example). This paper on information hazards is a preview to many of the issues we face today.
Ideological hazards: Most people have only a little knowledge about what their ideological belief (whether religious or political) really encompasses. On the web, you can learn that your chosen belief system also includes hazardous elements that you feel you need to adopt. 2/
Evocation hazards: there may be particular information that, when people encounter it, triggers them. This is not just in the common sense of triggering past trauma, but that some conspiracy theories or memes might be unusually tempting to people in particular mental states. 3/
Who needs NFTs in video games? In-game items are already doing everything they are supposed to do. In 2017, between $3-$5 billion a year was spent buying and trading decorative weapons (& opportunities to gamble on them) in the game Counterstrike. Almost all was money laundering.
Having built games & worked with the game industry a lot, I am confused about what NFT & blockchain-based ownership adds from a game developer’s perspective. The main issue is making games that people want to play for a long time; monetizing those games is a pretty solved problem
Also, item portability seems like a bad thing from a game dev perspective. I want to sell you new digital items, I don’t want you to import stuff you earned elsewhere. Again, games have experimented with this, you don’t need the blockchain, it is a business & not technical issue.
Some people just don’t like being told what to do & if they feel restricted by rules, they do the opposite. Example: If you make people high in reactance sign an agreement not to cheat, they actually cheat more. This pre-COVID paper shows reactance also drives anti-vax behavior.
Incidentally, this summary of reactance research had the best possible title.
Bad news: Leaded fuel reduced the IQ of everyone born before 1990 by ~4.25%. Millennials are the first to be born with unleaded gas.
Worse news: a new paper shows environmental lead levels from leaded gasoline are still around in cities today, and cause continued neurotoxicity.
Incidentally, everyone should know the story of Thomas Midgley, who oversaw the invention & spread of both leaded gas AND chlorofluorocarbons. He had, as J. R. McNeill wrote “more impact on the atmosphere than any other single organism in earth’s history.” interestingengineering.com/thomas-midgley…
Well, I just learned from the comments that we inexplicably still allow leaded gas for small airplanes.
And the damages to kids from lead exposure among these most-travelled routes is in the billions of dollars a year, as outlined in this paper.