A 14-year-old Palestinian girl just stabbed a Jewish woman who was pushing a stroller and walking her children to school. Can critical theory and institutional racism help you understand this? Can apartheid and social justice explain it without entangling us is delusional /1
abstractions? For a Westerner whose mind is well molded in modern liberal habits of mind, there is no way to understand this weird mystifying incident. Reporters will write entire essays about this, academics will write papers without a single mention of "antisemitism," a word /2
that easily cuts through the matter and explains it. The most obvious characteristic of such terrorist attacks is that they are committed by children, and their childhood exposes the true essence of the matter, simple faith in the villainy of Jews as Jews. In antisemitic /3
imagination the difference between being an IDF guard and a mother pushing a stroller is a mere delusion. A Jew is a Jew and evil nature is Jewish nature. Personal variations are mere formalities. This is what such acts of Palestinian childhood truly expose through the lies /4
of the activists and the apologists and the intellectuals. I don't hate that little girl. I was once exactly like her, a 14-year-old child who believes that Jews, babies, and adults, old and young, are nothing but absolute evil. I'm outraged though. I'm outraged at everyone /5
who for decades has been ignoring this tragic reality of the prevalence of antisemitism as a religious and existential world view in the Middle East. Not just ignoring, but often deliberately obfuscating this fact and working really hard to prevent people from seeing it. /6
My journey to deal with this led me everywhere, to American political institutions, to academic institutions, media institutions. I talked to politicians, professors, analysts, experts, etc. "They don't really believe this." They would just dismiss it all with a clever smile. /7
"It's all rhetoric and ideological fluff.. antisemitism doesn't determine the outcome." I was told by the carrying cardmembers of the American liberal elites. Go tell that to that poor Jewish woman and her children. But what is even worse, I eventually discovered what those /8
experts say so, it is because they themselves don't believe in anything anymore. American liberalism became a preposterous philisitnic phariseeism of a nation of technicians who believe in nothing but means and techniques. They don't believe the Iranians or the Palestinians /9
really believe in what they say they believe because they personally don't believe in what they say they believe. It's all mere projection, all but externalization. No wonder liberalism is being eaten up whole by progressive and socialist predators. If this is the end of /10
liberalism, lower case, or upper case, then count me as an anti-liberal. I will stand instead with this Jewish mother and her children, and I will stand with the Palestinian children who are being indoctrinated into hatred and death.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hussein Aboubakr Mansour

Hussein Aboubakr Mansour Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HusseinAboubak

9 Dec
Many of the carrying cardmembers of the American liberal elite insist that marching down the streets of Tehran shouting "Death to America.. Death to Israel" is all just performative social gatherings. That Palestinians calling for "slaughtering the Jews" is merely expressive /1
of injustice. I struggle to try to explain that those beliefs and ideas DO matter. But eventually, it did hit me, those liberals and experts say and think so because they themselves don't believe in anything anymore. American liberalism became a preposterous philisitnic /2
phariseeism of a nation of technicians who believe in nothing but means and techniques. They don't believe the Iranians or the Palestinians really believe in what they say they believe because they personally don't believe in what they say they believe. It's all mere /3
Read 7 tweets
7 Dec
Do not seek greatness for yourself, and do not covet honor. Practice more than you learn. Do not yearn for the table of kings, for your table is greater than their table, and your crown is greater than their crown and faithful is your employer to pay you the reward of your /1
labor. Greater is learning Torah than the priesthood and than royalty, for royalty is acquired by thirty stages, and the priesthood by twenty-four, but the Torah by forty-eight things. By study, Attentive listening, Proper speech, By an understanding heart, By an intelligent /2
heart, By awe, By fear, By humility, By joy, By attending to the sages, By critical give and take with friends, By fine argumentation with disciples, By clear thinking, By study of Scripture, By study of mishnah, By a minimum of sleep, By a minimum of chatter, By a minimum of /3
Read 8 tweets
13 Nov
Zionism in its origin, as a romanticist and idealist national project, was distinct among all similar movements in more than one way: while other projects were options among other options, Zionism was progressively compulsory given the rise of predatory mass antisemitism in /1
early 20th century Europe that later culminated in the Holocaust. This made Zionism not merely a nationalist project, but a survivalist imperative. Second, because of the first point Zionism was inherently a defensive nationalism as opposed to the prevalent mode of offensive /2
nationalisms built on self-realization of the German kind in Europe (Germany, Italy, France, Russia, etc.) and later in the Middle East. That is, Zionism was romanticist for survival purposes not for self-aggrandizement purposes. Third, the historical circumstances of /3
Read 12 tweets
11 Nov
There is an assumption among many people that Islamists deceptively appropriate wokeness. This assumption portrays that Muslim wokeness must be disingenuous. While this is definitely true on the level of Islamist leaders and politicians, but among many young Muslims woke is /1
as genuinely appealing as it is among young Jews. I spoke to many young American women in hijab who genuinely think Islam is intersectional trans-friendly anti-colonial enterprise. This should show you how potent and dangerous wokeness is. Some who may read this may find it /2
nearly impossible for someone wearing one of the foremost symbols of oppressing women would actually believe this, but that's because you still think woke is truly about justice, liberation, decolonization, etc. It isn't! Not for one bit. It is a predatory totalitarian /3
Read 4 tweets
8 Nov
. Just the kind we all now love; young, brown, female, hip, and cool. The bottom line of her book is that the only way to achieve world justice is the destruction of Jewish sovereignty. /1
I'm used to reading this kind of propaganda and delusional fantasies but what really got on my nerves in this book is how at the end she is very benevolently and selflessly extending a branch of peace to the "Zionist settlers" saying they will be allowed to live but they are /2
only asked to "relinquish their desire to rule" and just let them be part of a Palestinian context. The obnoxious delusional, yet gentle sounding, paternalism is just maddening. The supposed "academics" who do such gaslighting and psychological abuse as if it was some profound /3
Read 6 tweets
8 Oct
The social history of the Middle East is much more interesting than most people think. In the 1960s, during a period of state-led westernization, the Arab feminist movement that led the effort for the liberalization of women took the lead in producing feminist antisemitism /1
in various literary forms. The Iraqi female poet Nazik AlMala'eka produced a poem decrying miniskirts as a "Jewish innovation." The Lebanese radical feminist Leila AlBalabaki authored the novel "I live" in which she juxtaposed herself against a pregnant Jewish woman /2
whom she described as "the Jewess carrying an enemy, a butcher, while I'm carrying in my head the tragedies of a nation.. she is preparing the future of a despised people and I prepare in my head the fantasies of a meeting. Every day, she drops poison from her blood into /3
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(