If the 1/6 committee tossed Bannon and Meadows in the Capitol jail cell, a federal judge would free them by the end of the day, and then the committee would have zero leverage against anyone going forward. The pundits calling for this are either clueless or full of shit.
As always, the pundits are merely trying to position themselves as being smarter and more aggressive than Democratic leaders, whom they (inaccurately) paint as hapless cowards. It’s what they base their brand on. It doesn’t matter that these pundits’ “clever” ideas are laughable.
The pundits know full well that the point of busting Bannon and Meadows is to scare other more skittish witnesses into cooperating, which is working. But if the pundits admit that, then they have nothing to bash the 1/6 committee for, and no way to paint themselves as clever.
If the committee had busted two other witnesses for contempt and it scared Bannon and Meadows into cooperating, the pundits would ignore this cooperation and instead harp on the fact that the two other witnesses aren’t cooperating. The pundits AlWAYS use this particular trope.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Palmer Report

Palmer Report Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PalmerReport

10 Dec
Wealthy and powerful people like Trump generally get away with crimes by finding a way to not get indicted to begin with, and they have various ways to pull that off. But once they do get indicted, they tend to go down. Even fancy lawyers usually won't get you off at trial.
Trump is under criminal investigation in three jurisdictions, two of which have reached the grand jury stage.

If Trump gets indicted for financial crimes (Manhattan or Westchester), or gets indicted for election tampering (Georgia), there is every reason to expect he'll go down.
The wealthy and powerful person's main tool for not getting indicted is to keep crimes a secret. Paying others do to the crimes, paying to cover it up, so prosecutors don't even know to look for anything.

For Trump, that ship has already sailed. Prosecutors are clearly onto him.
Read 11 tweets
10 Dec
The doomsday types are already insisting Jason Miller won't go through with cooperating. That misses the point. The committee has set precedent that you have to turn over valuable evidence just to buy yourself time. And if Miller backs out, he goes to prison for contempt anyway.
So if the committee is sticking to its own precedent, Miller must have already turned over valuable evidence just to get his contempt deadline pushed back slightly. That would be a win for the committee whether Miller ends up fully cooperating or not.
Just as the committee's dealings with Mark Meadows were win for the committee, because Meadows turned over the texts and powerpoint stuff before backing out. And now Meadows will go to prison for contempt anyway. As will Miller if he backs out.
Read 6 tweets
10 Dec
Way too many people on our side think they're being "vigilant" by assigning magical powers to the bad guys, and insisting the bad guys are going to win no matter what.

That's NOT vigilance. It's self defeating idiocy. It just emboldens the bad guys come at us harder.
When you behave like this, you are working full-time for Donald Trump, whether you realize it or not.

The biggest gift you can give Trump world is to keep telling them that next time they'll win for sure.

You want to defeat them? Call out their weakness and break their spirit.
We have an entire industry of liberal doomsday pundits who have built their careers by brainwashing our side into believing "vigilance" means spending all day staring paralyzed in fear at their scary predictions and/or angrily foaming at the mouth about how were going to lose.
Read 5 tweets
10 Dec
The PowerPoint presentation proves two things:

1) The election overthrow plot was hilariously inept and had zero chance of even coming close to working.

2) It was nonetheless a treason plot involving the uppermost levels of the Trump regime.

These two things can both be true.
Just because someone commits a crime like treason or election fraud in an ineptly stupid way that has zero chance of achieving any of the stated goals, it doesn’t mitigate the crime that was committed. It’s still treason and election fraud.
That said, the whole plot was just so obviously never going to keep Trump in office. Even if they had succeeded in killing Pence, for instance, it still wouldn’t have magically resulted in Trump getting a second term. But a treason plot that’s guaranteed to fail is still treason.
Read 6 tweets
10 Dec
The doomsday pundits spend every day reinforcing the narrative that Trump and his goons have a collection of magic wands for getting out of any situation. That way, whenever the good guys score a major win, the pundits can write it off by pointing to those supposed magic wands.
It's difficult to believe that any full grown adult could fall for such silly cartoon-like narratives. But that's why the pundits work so hard every day to scare you into accepting that these imaginary magic wands are real.
"The republicans will magically keep a 1/6 committee from ever happening!"

"The witnesses can just invoke privilege and they'll never be indicted for it!"

"The witnesses can plead the fifth and magically waltz away from their troubles!"
Read 11 tweets
9 Dec
The doomsday pundits are basing all their scary predictions on the premise that the 1/6 committee members are all complete morons who:

1) can't read a calendar

2) forgot to interview friendly witnesses before moving on to hostile ones

3) don't know when the midterms are
Once you realize the 1/6 committee members aren't morons, did amass evidence from friendly witnesses, control the pace of their own probe, and will make criminal referrals that will carry over no matter how the midterms go, you realize these doomsday pundits are pushing FICTION.
Ask yourself: is committee member Adam Schiff a complete moron who can't read a calendar and doesn't understand how to handle witnesses? Or is he a savvy politician who knows when the midterms are, and a former prosecutor who knows exactly how probes work? You know the answer.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(