The doomsday pundits are basing all their scary predictions on the premise that the 1/6 committee members are all complete morons who:
1) can't read a calendar
2) forgot to interview friendly witnesses before moving on to hostile ones
3) don't know when the midterms are
Once you realize the 1/6 committee members aren't morons, did amass evidence from friendly witnesses, control the pace of their own probe, and will make criminal referrals that will carry over no matter how the midterms go, you realize these doomsday pundits are pushing FICTION.
Ask yourself: is committee member Adam Schiff a complete moron who can't read a calendar and doesn't understand how to handle witnesses? Or is he a savvy politician who knows when the midterms are, and a former prosecutor who knows exactly how probes work? You know the answer.
Is Bennie Thompson a complete moron? Is Jamie Raskin a complete moron? Is Liz Cheney a complete moron?
Because these scary predictions from the doomsday pundits are all based ENTIRELY on the premise that the committee members are all too stupid to tie their own shoelaces.
The doomsday pundits insisted the committee members were too timid to ever send a criminal referral. WRONG. Then the pundits said the DOJ would never act on a criminal referral. WRONG. How much more wrong do they have to be, before you realize they're just making up scary things?
It doesn't make you "vigilant" if you sit around fretting over the scariest of doomsday predictions. It makes you gullible, because these doomsday predictions are incompatible with the facts, and are DESIGNED to make you sit around fretting over them.
The doomsday pundits are insisting Mark Meadows outsmarted the committee by cooperating and then backing out. But in reality he gave them crucial evidence against the Trump White House, and he's still going to prison for contempt. It's clear who won and lost THAT exchange.
That's another thing. The doomsday pundits always base their scary predictions on the premise that the bad guys are all super geniuses who can just do whatever they want by waving a magic wand. When in reality most of the bad guys are self defeating morons like Mark Meadows.
The doomsday pundits ALWAYS try to sell you on the scary premise that the good guys are complete morons and the bad guys are total geniuses. It's Saturday morning cartoon level nonsense. But they count on you being too scared by it to logically or factually examine any of it.
That's why it never seems to matter that the doomsday pundits end up wildly wrong on just about everything they predict. When they're proven wrong, you're too relieved to ever put it together that they're ALWAYS wrong. Then they distract you with their next scary nonsense.
Once a doomsday pundit has convinced you that your side's leaders are cowardly morons, that the other side is going to win no matter what, and that the pundit is the only smart and savvy one in all of this, you end up PRAISING that pundit for feeding you scary bullshit.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Even Dan Quayle, who has the IQ of a bowl of cherries, has acknowledged that there was literally no way for Mike Pence to somehow magically overturn the election results. So why is the media still pretending that Trump’s dumbass treason plot had any chance of ever working?
Why do I keep harping in this? Because it’s important.
First, the truth matters.
But also: the average American will look at the facts and accept that Trump and his people really were carrying out a treason plot. But they will NOT accept any claims that it “almost worked.”
Average Americans are going to see the laughably moronic nature of this treason plot, the inept way in which it was carried out by complete idiots, and the fact that no one can explain how it could possibly have resulted in Trump magically getting a second term.
The Trump regime’s plot to overthrow the election consisted of pressuring Mike Pence to wave a magic wand that didn’t exist. You don’t have to give Pence any credit for refusing to go along with it, because there was nothing for Pence to go along with.
The most Pence could have done was verbally object to the certification, which the Senate would have certified anyway. And if Trump didn’t like it, the courts would have immediately laughed in his face. There was literally nothing Pence could have done to keep Trump in office.
And Pence knew all of this, which is why he didn’t bother futilely making a fool of himself. He knew it was a desperate and defeated Trump asking him to wave a magic wand that simply did not exist outside of Trump’s hallucinatory mind.
Thank you Ari Melber for acknowledging on MSNBC just now that Mitch McConnell is not some omnipotent figure who always wins, and that in reality he often blinks or loses battles. Palmer Report has been hammering home this fact all year.
McConnell often wins, and he often loses. He’s very savvy but he doesn’t have a magic wand. Yet for years the media (on the left and right) has falsely portrayed McConnell as always getting his way on everything, by simply not covering the numerous times he’s lost or caved.
Why would the media misrepresent this? The usual answer: ratings.
Right wingers like to be told they’re winning, so right wing media always insists McConnell is winning.
Liberals respond to being told they’re losing, so liberal media also always insists McConnell is winning.
Wealthy and powerful people like Trump generally get away with crimes by finding a way to not get indicted to begin with, and they have various ways to pull that off. But once they do get indicted, they tend to go down. Even fancy lawyers usually won't get you off at trial.
Trump is under criminal investigation in three jurisdictions, two of which have reached the grand jury stage.
If Trump gets indicted for financial crimes (Manhattan or Westchester), or gets indicted for election tampering (Georgia), there is every reason to expect he'll go down.
The wealthy and powerful person's main tool for not getting indicted is to keep crimes a secret. Paying others do to the crimes, paying to cover it up, so prosecutors don't even know to look for anything.
For Trump, that ship has already sailed. Prosecutors are clearly onto him.
The doomsday types are already insisting Jason Miller won't go through with cooperating. That misses the point. The committee has set precedent that you have to turn over valuable evidence just to buy yourself time. And if Miller backs out, he goes to prison for contempt anyway.
So if the committee is sticking to its own precedent, Miller must have already turned over valuable evidence just to get his contempt deadline pushed back slightly. That would be a win for the committee whether Miller ends up fully cooperating or not.
Just as the committee's dealings with Mark Meadows were win for the committee, because Meadows turned over the texts and powerpoint stuff before backing out. And now Meadows will go to prison for contempt anyway. As will Miller if he backs out.
Way too many people on our side think they're being "vigilant" by assigning magical powers to the bad guys, and insisting the bad guys are going to win no matter what.
That's NOT vigilance. It's self defeating idiocy. It just emboldens the bad guys come at us harder.
When you behave like this, you are working full-time for Donald Trump, whether you realize it or not.
The biggest gift you can give Trump world is to keep telling them that next time they'll win for sure.
You want to defeat them? Call out their weakness and break their spirit.
We have an entire industry of liberal doomsday pundits who have built their careers by brainwashing our side into believing "vigilance" means spending all day staring paralyzed in fear at their scary predictions and/or angrily foaming at the mouth about how were going to lose.