This is an interesting article, and not wrong, but I think it’s a little beside the point. Whether Biden is treated better or worse by the press, he is simply a qualitatively different president from Trump.
The press should be an active force to reveal the truth in our cities, states, nation, and world. They don’t owe it to any politician to be positive or “nice.” The problem is that they are continuing to treat this as merely opposing political forces with different ideals.
That simply isn’t the state of our nation. The former president is a liar and a fraud, who served and serves only himself: his power, his financial interests, and his ego. But his daily idiocy provided shiny objects for the press to chase, for clicks in a 24-hour cycle.
Biden, in contrast, is steady, and doesn’t feed into the clickbait cycle. So the press seeks conflict and dissension, turning the complexities of leadership in a toxic political environment and inherited messes into blown-up notions of failure.
Beyond feeding the incessantly short-term focus of our news cycles, our media outlets are seeking to provide not actual fairness, but the impression of fairness. Bruised by the constant attacks from the prior administration, there is a bias toward looking “balanced.”
It’s all an illusion. There is no balance to be found between navigating a dangerous evacuation of Afghanistan and trying to overturn a US election; between exacerbating a pandemic through lies and trying to move a nation toward vaccination against it.
Dissenting voices within a party are part of “usual” politics—because people working toward the best solutions will differ in their ideas of what those solutions should be. But when one party has no interest in solutions, that normal dissension isn’t going to be there.
The attempts to cover politics in the usual ways simply don’t apply here. And to be fair, some get it; @NicolleDWallace, for example, does a great job of revealing the GOP opposition to democracy in every show. But we need more.
Freedom of the press exists because a press unencumbered by government control should be able to shine the light of truth on those in power. False equivalencies between a party arguing about the best solutions and a party seeking to shut down democracy shine no such light.
So hold Biden accountable to the people. Just don’t pretend that there are two parties with competing ideas to lift our nation; one party seeks only to destroy and entrench its own power, and nitpicking the current president without that context is a disservice to the country.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The DC Court of Appeals opinion released today that shoots down Trump’s increasingly frivolous executive privilege claim is another excellent piece of legal writing and reasoning. Worth a full read if you have time, but distillation follows here. (Thread)
First, the upshot: Trump has no right to have his documents withheld. He has 14 days to appeal, and he will, to the Supreme Court. While the Court has a disturbingly partisan streak right now, bowing to a wholly specious argument seems a bridge too far for most of the Justices.
In terms of the legal arguments, Trump’s position deserves little more than “Motion for injunction denied, because this claim of executive privilege is meritless.” But the Court isn’t writing for Trump; it’s writing for posterity when this country has to decide what it will be.
For those who believe voting doesn’t matter, because “both parties are the same,” “there’s no real difference,” or some version of this, I get it. You want to see a difference in your life, and don’t care about squabbles in D.C. But there are critical differences. (Thread)
1. Republicans want you to believe government doesn’t work, so it should just be Freedom, O.K. Corral style. Democrats want to create laws and policies that make government work to help people.
2. Republicans believe the richest Americans need tax breaks to work harder and get richer. Democrats believe taxes are an investment that allows government to work better—and it’s fair to ask those to whom America has given the most to pay their fair share.
The most obvious kind of bias in media is one-sided bias: outlets like Fox News and Newsmax skewing facts or just blatantly lying to viewers to serve a political interest. But there is also a bias in reputable sources to treat opposing sides as having equal value—true or not.
This doesn’t necessarily come from a nefarious place. Media sources whose brand isn’t positioned as right-wing mouthpieces benefit from being perceived as “fair.” But when they seek that perception by ignoring or misrepresenting facts, that’s a problem too.
Right now, one party has all but abandoned the principles of democracy, and seeks through all it says or does to achieve power, in a zero-sum battle not just with Democrats, but with citizens of this country. It has condoned and openly supported violence and insurrection.
When Boebert is handed a mic,
All the babbling and screeching will spike.
Lauren’s words have no use
(Save linguistic abuse),
But this moron just won’t take a hike.
Need a guide? Here’s a good rule of thumb:
At her best, Boebert’s words are just dumb.
Lauren’s Brandon dress hit?
A derivative bit;
Lady even throws shade like a bum. news.yahoo.com/amphtml/rep-la…
Past the stupid, this lady’s just nuts—
Like the rest in the GOP ruts.
You can’t stand out a bunch
When your mind’s out to lunch;
Their insane kills by ten thousand cuts. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
As the GOP claims it is fighting for “freedom,” it’s worth noting that everything they put out there is about either taking something away or refusing to provide something. Let’s take a look. (Thread)
Their notion of parental freedom in education involves removing books and ideas from the classroom. Some parents don’t want their kids to understand that LGBTQ people are real, or that slavery existed and was a blight on humanity. So they want to take it away from everyone.
Their idea of “voting rights” is freedom for GOP state legislatures to make it harder to vote, and reduce to a minimum the impact of some people’s votes.
When a major storm hits, it takes time to rebuild—even without people actively working to undermine the rebuilding efforts. All of this starts with the foundations, with making sure the structure is sound to support everything else that has to rise up around it.
Getting DeJoy out matters, and everyone crying out for his removal was right to do so. But removing him the right way, following the rules in place, matters. We want to (and must) undo the damage of today’s GOP, but rushing through the process and cutting corners is dangerous.
The infrastructure bill and the Build Back Better package are fantastic metaphors for all of this. These are focused on creating better structures for this nation and its citizens. It’s not sexy, but it’s creating a stronger American foundation than we had before the storm.