Last week Fair Play For Women threatened a judicial review if the deadline for public responses was not extended.
Today, the Government has conceded and will announce the deadline is to be extended by a further 8 weeks, more than doubling the consultation period to 14 weeks /2.
Two autistic women joined Fair Play For Women as co-claimants threatening legal action accusing the Government of breaking disability discrimination laws. /3
An 'Easy Read’ document – designed to enable people with learning difficulties to access the consultation – was published 4 weeks late and then rapidly withdrawn the same day leaving only a week to respond before the consultation was due to close on Friday 10th December /4
Jane – one of the autistic women involved in the legal action – said:
“As an autistic adult, I have first-hand experience of the sort of processing difficulties that can make navigating complex paperwork extremely difficult and time consuming." /4
"Given the significant crossover between autism and gender dysphoria, the lack of an easy read version will have the effect of excluding many who would wish to engage in the process”. /5
The second autistic co-claimant said:
“I had been waiting over a month for the promised Easy Read to be published and was worried about my ability to respond with only days left before the consultation was due to close" /6
"I needed the deadline extended to give me enough time to think about the issues and how they might affect me and my daughters”.
A third of children referred to the Tavistock Gender clinic have autistic traits or a diagnosis of autism. /7
Dr Williams: “We're pleased they have agreed to publish an Easy Read & extend the deadline. Without this concession many people would not have had their views heard & an important group they needed to hear from – autistic young people & their parents – would have been excluded”/8
"The Government has been rushing to get this bill into law before an LGBT conference it’s hosting next year. Rushing legislation means mistakes get made. This law is complex, controversial and could harm children if they get it wrong. It is too important to be rushed”. /9
"We hope this gives officials time to slow down and reflect more widely on the law-making process. They must now take time to consider the public’s views and commit to undertaking proper pre-legislative scrutiny before any bill reaches parliament”. /10
Legal action is an important tool in protecting the sex-based rights of women & girls. Supporters tell us they do, too. The right legal outcome can set a precedent, or stop one, and show public bodies they will be held to account. /1
When we raised funds to fight the ONS, we pledged to use any money left over to explore ways in which we can use the law to re-establish our boundaries /2
We’ve obtained legal advice on a range of issues, so we can identify the best ways to use the courts to help our cause. It’s not enough that something seems unfair or illogical; there also has to be a strong legal basis and an appropriate legal route to challenge or redress /3
THREAD: Fair Play For Women is back in court defending the meaning of sex. This time its the Scottish Government wanting to change sex into gender identity in the Scottish Census /1
The Scottish guidance is unlawful. It says people may self-identify when answering the sex question in the census.
“If you are transgender the answer you give can be different from what is on your birth certificate. You do not need a Gender Recognition Certificate. /2
The Scottish Government is ignoring the UK-wide 1920 Census Act and our win in the English High Court that sex CANNOT be self-identified /3
THREAD: Yesterday BBC2 are rather bland and uninspiring 90 minute documentary called "womanhood". But within it they spared 15 mins to cover "the trans debate". 😱 /1
First they went to a night club to meet a transgender woman called Evie. Evie passes so well that even the fiancée of 4 years didn't know his girlfriend had been born male. Cue lots of cooing and smiles from the celebs and Shirley Ballas asking the obvious question /2
Tense music.... the celebs are preparing for their next interview. Suzi tells us how she fears they might be "platforming some quite hateful views". She tells us how toxic it is and how it becomes a "slagging match". Suzi resolutely declares "I don't want any part of that!". /3
Baroness Jenkins asks @GEO minister whether she agrees that a small misclassification of sex can have a large distorting effect on gender pay gap in professions where <5% workforce is female /1
She gets a very unsatisfactory answer from the minister:
"no plans to change the guidance...gender pay is not supposed to be a data collecting exercise...to do so would increase the burden on employers" /2
Employers are obliged by law to COLLECT DATA on the gender pay gap and GEO publishes it.
And the point of it is to determine gap in pay between males and female
Of course its a data collection exercise! And of course sex matters! /3
GOOD NEWS THREAD:
We recently reported in how the NHS collects information on sex and gender identity. Sex was being erased from NHS datasets /1 fairplayforwomen.com/how-does-the-n…
As part of that work we discovered that the NHS were developing Unified Information Standards for each of the protected characteristics. The NHS refused to reveal to us what their recommendations to ministers would be /2
Lord Hunt @LordPhilofBrum kindly agreed to ask the government about the plans and submitted a range of written parliamentary questions /3