The House just passed the most significant set of checks and balances to guard against presidential abuse of power in a generation. The #ProtectingOurDemocracy Act implements safeguards that are critical to shoring up our democracy. 1/12
My colleague @Martha_Kinsella has outlined some of #PODA’s key provisions, e.g. codification of the Emoluments Clauses, measures to prevent improper communications between the White House & DOJ, and transparency requirements for presidential pardons. 2/12 brennancenter.org/our-work/analy…
I want to highlight one additional provision that I consider particularly important: reform of the National Emergencies Act (NEA), the law Trump abused to evade Congress and secure funding for his border wall. 3/12
Under current law, the president has near-total discretion to declare a national emergency. That declaration unlocks enhanced powers contained in 120+ statutes spanning all areas of governance, from agricultural exports to military deployment. 4/12 brennancenter.org/our-work/resea…
Some of these powers are frighteningly broad and ripe for abuse. In a piece I wrote for @TheAtlantic in 2019, I outlined some of the ways emergency powers could be wielded to undermine democracy. 5/12 theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…
The president can renew emergency declarations each year for an indefinite period. Congress can vote to terminate a declaration, but in practice this requires a veto-proof supermajority. That’s too high a hurdle when such potent powers are in play. 6/12
Under PODA, presidential emergency declarations would automatically terminate after 20 legislative days unless approved by Congress. Annual renewals would also require congressional approval, and a 5-year total limit would prevent “permanent emergencies.” 7/12
This is the right approach to emergency powers reform. It gives the president flexibility when most needed—in the immediate aftermath of a crisis—while ensuring that Congress can fulfill its role as a coequal branch & a check on executive overreach. 8/12 politico.com/news/magazine/…
PODA also requires the president to disclose presidential emergency action documents (“PEADs”) to Congress. These are secret orders, drafted in anticipation of a range of worst-case scenarios, ready for the president’s signature at a moment’s notice. 9/12 nytimes.com/2020/04/10/opi…
No PEAD has ever been made public. But based on official documents describing contents of Cold War-era PEADs, there’s reason to fear they would implement drastic measures such as martial law, censorship, & detention without charge or judicial review. 10/12 brennancenter.org/our-work/resea…
PEADs are not shared with Congress. This prevents Congress from fulfilling its role as a check against presidential abuse of power. PODA would fix this by requiring disclosure of PEADs to the relevant congressional committees. 11/12
Very sorry to see that the “pre-conferenced” version of the NDAA, hashed out by leadership in the House and Senate, doesn’t include critical reforms to domestic military deployment authorities that were part of the House-passed bill. 1/12 rules.house.gov/sites/democrat…
To begin, the new version—which will likely become law without further amendment—dropped the provision that would have transferred command and control of the DC National Guard from the president to D.C.’s mayor. 2/12
As my colleague @josephanunn and I have pointed out, this provision would have closed a dangerous loophole in the Posse Comitatus Act that allows presidents to use the DCNG as a domestic military police force. 3/12 slate.com/news-and-polit…
In yesterday’s markup of the National Defense Authorization Act, the House Armed Services Committee voted for three reforms that would help to prevent some of the improper uses of National Guard forces we’ve seen in the past year and a half. 1/14
First, the committee rejected an amendment that would have stripped @EleanorNorton’s D.C. National Guard Home Rule Act from the NDAA. That legislation, championed on the committee by @RepAnthonyBrown, transfers command of the D.C. Guard from the president to D.C.’s mayor. 2/14
As my colleague @josephanunn and I have explained, that’s a long overdue reform. Presidential command of the D.C. National Guard is a relic from an era before D.C. had any local government. 3/14 justsecurity.org/74098/why-d-c-…
Today, @BrennanCenter is launching “9/11 at 20”—a series of ten essays offering a high-level critique of national security policies over the past two decades and a vision for our country’s approach to national security in the future. 1/5 brennancenter.org/9-11-at-20
The essays address a range of issues, from racial profiling to secret wars to the future of the Department of Homeland Security. The authors include past and present members of Congress, former senior executive branch officials, legal scholars, and Brennan Center experts. 2/5
The first two essays, posted today, include a call from former senator and current @ACSlaw president @RussFeingold for Congress to reclaim its role as an equal branch of government in national security policy… 3/5 brennancenter.org/our-work/analy…
The bill has three parts. The first part would inject life back into the War Powers Resolution, a 1973 law that was meant to constrain presidential warmaking but has utterly failed to do so. 2/18
The WPR required presidents to notify Congress when U.S. military forces are engaged (or will likely become engaged) in “hostilities.” It mandated an end to such hostilities within 60 days if Congress did not authorize them. 3/18
Anyone who is concerned about government surveillance practices should stop whatever they’re doing and read this statement by Travis LeBlanc, a member of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (@PCLOB_GOV). 1/19 washingtonpost.com/context/statem…
His statement, released with redactions after the gov’t performed a declassification review, is a devastating takedown of the PCLOB's classified 2020 report on “XKEYSCORE,” a tool the NSA uses to process communications obtained without a warrant under Executive Order 12333. 2/19
The NSA doesn’t need a warrant to conduct surveillance under EO 12333 because the data is collected overseas and Americans can't be targeted. But no one denies that EO 12333 surveillance “incidentally” sweeps up Americans’ communications and data, likely in massive amounts. 3/19
Another day, another FISA Court opinion approving a program that sweeps up millions of Americans’ communications, despite finding that the FBI has failed to comply with the rules meant to protect Americans’ privacy. 1/25 intel.gov/assets/documen…
To refresh your recollection, here’s my Tweet thread on the last FISC opinion (issued Dec. 2019) approving Section 702 surveillance in the face of widespread violations of privacy rules by the FBI and NSA:
Basically, the 2019 opinion chided the government for its violations, but the court approved the surveillance on the condition that the government implement new training and record-keeping requirements…3/25