I’m almost finished with a writing retreat. I’m taking a quick break to offer a few writing hints. I hope you’ll find them helpful.
1) One of the main reasons writers—particularly younger writers—don’t improve is because they look at their writing as their baby. That is, they can’t take it being criticized. To improve in anything, esp writing, you must not only be able to accept but appreciate criticism.
2) If you’re writing nonfiction, do not wait until your piece is finished to turn your attention to the references. Work on them simultaneously. This is one of the biggest mistakes people make when writing their first nonfiction book.
3) Send your piece out to friends for feedback. Incorporate their comments and then send it out again to other friends for their feedback. Only after that should you send it to your editor.
A quick story. The editor of my first book was the cofounder of The Onion. I submitted a chapter to him that had one misspelled word. He told me that if I ever did that again our professional relationship was over. It was a great lesson.
4) There are a lot of editors, but *very* few good editors. Take the time to find an editor who’s experienced at editing the kind of work your writing. (If your working on a book and don’t have money for an editor, offer them a percentage of the sales.)
5) I keep a dictionary and thesaurus open when I’m writing. Try to use the most precise word possible, and if you don’t know the exact definition of a word then do not use it.
6) In #6 I shifted from “don’t” to “do not”.
A few things:
- in general, avoid repeating a word in a sentence (see “a” twice here)
- do not use contractions when you want to emphasize a point: “Do not go into the harbor” is strong than “Don’t go into the harbor”
7) Avoid semicolons. They’re pretentious and often lazy.
8) Write. It doesn’t have to be perfect or even good. Just get something down. If your struggling with a section then work on another section—do not use that as an excuse to not write.
9) People with whom you’re intimate need to understand that you are a writer and that you need uninterrupted time to work. Explain that you will be absent a lot of the time, but it’s not personal. It’s writing and it matters to you.
10) Write every day.
Bonus: Celebrate a good day of work. I celebrate by drinking my favorite whisky, Oban, shown in the first tweet.
The “you’re” comments cracked me up. Thanks
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This official document is from the Oregon Department of Education:“Communicating about Racial Equity in a Charged Environment”
It teaches educators how to speak about CRT and racial equity.
Here are a few things to think about as you read it…
1) The entire document is rooted in equity and how to speak to people about equity, yet equity is not defined.
Moreover, it’s assumed that equity is an intrinsic good, and offers no argument or evidence for equity-based education.
2) Notice the stance toward CRT.
It tells educators *how* to deal with objections, but there’s nothing substantive in the responses. It suggests a listening stance (with platitudes) devoid of argument or engaging meaningful objections.
It's interesting to note the ideological slants in Trip Gabriel’s NYT piece about Glenn Youngkin. I know, I know, everyone will say “Duh, Boghossian, obviously.” But it’s useful to look at just two sentences to clarify the bias:
1) "conservatives’ belief that classwork has become overly conscious of racial differences"
2) "Mr. Youngkin’s best known pledge is to ban critical race theory in schools on Day 1, even though that graduate-school thesis about the role of racism in American institutions has little impact on K-12 classrooms, educators say."
Very few of these individuals are actually influential, but they were mostly written about by people who are. 1)
It appears as if these individuals were chosen for reasons relating to superficial diversity and not actual influence. (Certainly not enough influence to be in the top 100.) Here are just two problems with attempting to artificially manufacture such outcomes. 2)
1) The legitimacy of the periodical is called into question. Readers won’t trust TIME because the people on the list are obviously not the most influential people. 2) Readers won’t trust that other people on the list are actually influential. 3)
I’m sitting in the pet ER waiting for Lola to come out of surgery. She was attacked by a porcupine. Watching people who love their pets so deeply is moving.
This is Biju. She’s recovering from a heart attack.
Listening to many stories of people who rescued their animal from abusive homes and now they’re dealing with the consequences of physical abuse. Heartbreaking and also inspiring that so many people have so much goodness and decency.
This beautiful boy is Sunflower. He’s having digestive issues. He barks when someone new enters.
We're a group of parents, teachers, and students who are trying to help educate the public about the Social Justice crusade going on in some South Dakota public universities.
What we do, essentially, is anonymously leak/share evidence of political bias and indoctrination with the public.