Nature of NFTs

1/ Blockchains are unique database architectures that allow for shared state, or consensus between participants on common truth. This architecture lends itself to designating of basic property rights via tokenization & encryption (private keys).
2/ The 1st use case for property on chain was currency, designed for payments, fiat hedging, expressing/storing value on a common platform. The holder of the keys is assured by network enforcement with property rights. That's valuable in of itself & doesn't require governments.
3/ NFTs are a subset of property for a unique item set, & a misnomer w/ respect to fungibility. It's not a currency explicitly, but obviously carries value. It's a property primitive like a title on your house or car, but different in that it's digital w/ low transaction friction
4/ As property primitives it's the layer 0 of assurances, recognitions, upon which you can build more complex legal transactions. For example, in the physical world I can use my property primitive, my home, in more complex financial transactions.
5/ I can lease my home to a renter, or use it for AirBnB, modify it, borrow against it, or outright sell it. Similarly, most of the discussions we've had so far are about simply minting & selling NFTs, that's simply the most basic financial primitive.
6/ Once minted, an NFT can be used to express property primitives, but the assurances of the blockchain are insufficient. We need more complex assurances, physical as well as digital, to unlock the potential of NFTs. We need real contracts + smart contracts, super contracts.
7/ NFTs are going to explode into complex legal constructions that allow minters to monetize their creation: ex. artists can license creation for merchandise, screenwriters share with producers algorithmically, athletes can monetize performance for games, on and on and on...
8/ All physical & digital assets will be onchain representations of property primitives with the ability for cross chain interoperability with liquid currencies & real world legal assurances of business logic. The next phase of NFTs are about the full financialization of property

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Santiago Velez

Santiago Velez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Santiag78758327

7 Jul
One of the things that is interesting to me is teasing out the differences between how digital assets are value relative to the Bitcoin liquidity waterfall & their own inherent properties that drive their network effect inflation.
For example, one can study the narrative drive of Ethereum as a composable, smart contract platform that continues to add diverse use cases like DeFi, NFTs, AMMs, SCs, etc. (network effect drivers) vs. a single purpose digital asset like Monero (XMR), a privacy coin.
What you quickly notice is that for a while XMR & ETH traded at near parity (nascent networks without clear differentiation equally in the shadow of BTC). Once the additional network drivers took hold in ETH the deviation grew substantially.
Read 6 tweets
19 Jun
1/6 "Hand in hand with this centralisation, or this expropriation of many capitalists by few, develop, on an ever-extending scale, the cooperative form of the labour process, the conscious technical application of science, the methodical cultivation of the soil,..."
2/6 "..the transformation of the instruments of labour into instruments of labour only usable in common, the economising of all means of production by their use as means of production of combined, socialised labour, the entanglement of all peoples in the net of the world market..
3/6 "...and with this, the international character of the capitalistic regime. Along with the constantly diminishing number of the magnates of capital, who usurp and monopolise all advantages of this process of transformation, ..."
Read 6 tweets
3 Jun
This should make you angry if you use PoW chains that utilize concentrated mining pools. Shows via data that there is likely collusion in processing mempool fees are processed & overall resources optimized for the miners. Why anyone would build a financial system on top of this?
Strategic Capacity Management is the name of the game. Keep your resource at a premium at all times, even if means not delivering on the end user. Wow! Talk about being held hostage when blocks are left underutilized even during congested periods.
This is necessarily egregious.
Read 8 tweets
3 Jun
Tokenized shared platforms (ICOs) w network effects are superior at delivering value to participants than a simple competition between centralized monopolists. Rent seeking can be overcome more efficiently by tokenomics & shared prosperity than competition.
Entrepreneurs essentially become issuing mini-central banks in their micro-economy that represent the platform network but with predetermined issuance policy that participants can transparently view.
The key is DLT allowing for the amelioration of counterparty risk, sharing a common resource, & transparency that reduces the power of platform monopolists (e.g. Uber model).
Read 8 tweets
3 Jun
Wash trading on low ranked unregulated exchanges is highly incentived by rank improvement and attraction of traders that place a premium on liquidity. WT comprises a significant portion of the industry activity, dominates.

Excellent paper by Lin William Cong and team at Cornell.
XRP is the favorite to spook wash trading, but the arbitrage bots collapse the effect in less than 1 week. Likely due to low final settlement chain fees & large investor base.
Application of Benford's Law can catch wash trading exchanges:
Read 7 tweets
3 Jun
Excellent paper by Giovanni Compiani & Matteo Benetoon of UC Berkley on the role of belief in the price action of digital assets over demographics (early vs. late buyers & age).
cowles.yale.edu/3a/bcwp-invest…
Creating the model and sorting out some relative effects on a the data set.
The model:
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(