Supporting Ukraine is smart strategy. A prosperous Ukraine can compel change in Russia and upend the convergence of America’s two most dangerous adversaries. I explain the logic via this @NYTOpinionnytimes.com/2021/12/10/opi…
A prosperous Ukraine buttressed by American support makes an authoritarian Russia unviable in the long term.
Ukraine’s success would upend Russia’s irredentist aspirations for empire and highlight the Kremlin’s failures, just as West Germany’s achievements once did in comparison to the totalitarian East German state during the Cold War.
It may even convince the Russian people — who share a culture, history and religion with Ukrainians — to eventually demand their own framework for democratic transition.
To be sure, this doesn’t happen overnight. A generational investment is necessary to realize such a vision.
Nevertheless, the outlines of the stark contrast between a prosperous democratic Ukraine and a repressive and economically stagnant Russia are already evident. This is, in large part, why Mr. Putin needs Ukraine to be a failed state.
It feels ominously like 2014 again.
Russia is preparing to launch the largest military offensive in Europe since World War II.
To shift Mr. Putin’s calculus, it is imperative that the Biden administration’s policy toward Ukraine change both tactically and strategically.
The big issue at stake: the vital role a free & sovereign Ukraine plays in advancing U.S. interests against those of Russia and China.
Statements that U.S. interests end at NATO’s borders have only emboldened Mr. Putin to ignore international norms.
American neglect must end. After all, the United States and Ukraine share both ideology and long-term geopolitical interests.
Ukraine has made major strides in its experiment with democracy in the midst of war. The people have fought for basic rights and against repression.
A prosperous Ukraine buttressed by American support makes an authoritarian Russia unviable in the long term… just as West Germany’s once did in comparison to the totalitarian East Germany during the Cold War.
Mr. Putin needs Ukraine to be a failed state.
U.S. support for Ukraine helps drive apart China & Russia.
Preventing Mr. Putin from invading Ukraine demonstrates the strength of the West’s commitment to opposing autocracy & makes Russia a less potent partner to China as they both try to undermine the rules-based order.
To that end, the United States should bolster the defenses of NATO. This kind of deployment would signal that Russia’s aggression is driving the security posture Russia most wishes to avoid.
The Kremlin wishes to make NATO membership for Ukraine a central issue of any discussions. That’s a distraction right now because an assurance that Ukraine outside of NATO is unlikely to stop Russia from bringing Ukraine to heel.
The more important issue to consider is that negotiations with Russia should be dealt with at the level of European security. These talks should devise off-ramps that alleviate both European and Russian security concerns.
The United States should also engage Ukraine in more long-term bilateral initiatives on security, reform and economic cooperation. Washington should also sustain high-level relationship with Ukraine that isn’t defined by whether Kyiv is in crisis or not.
There are irrefutable benefits to the existence of a strong, democratic and independent Ukraine as a powerhouse at the crossroads.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“As for what the country wants, it must surely include general officers who haven’t surrendered their moral autonomy to the political administration of the day”
“Generals that have thought deeply about what their obligation to the nation really entails…
Understanding it demands intellectual and moral rigor. I would guess that these are the qualities that America expects of its generals.”
“Resignation won’t atone for lives lost, or the debacle that American involvement in Afghanistan became, but it would at least demonstrate that these men understand the ethics of their profession. It would help calibrate the moral compass of thousands of officers beneath them.”
From Steve Katz, @steveLkatz
“In the just war tradition, describing a Sisyphean strategy and then attempting to execute it is an immoral act. However, even in this circumstance, senior officers are still empowered with moral agency and a choice:”
“they can either stay in command and accept some of the moral liability in waging an unjust war or they can request to be re-assigned, resign, or retire to avoid this moral stain. Over the course of the war, no generals pursued the latter option.”
If we want our institutions to be our guardrails rather than relying on a constant supply of individual saviors, we should hold our leaders accountable.
Read this article, then let me know what you think.
The JCS has more than a half-dozen 4-star military officers, each with several decades of service and dedication to defending the constitution against all enemies foreign & domestic. I am befuddled by the notion that only Milley was standing between a madman and Armageddon.
The safe option isn’t always the right one. Capitol Police Officers such as Harry Dunn have found themselves in the crosshairs of radical, vindictive fanatics because they gave a truthful account their experiences on Jan. 6. I know a bit about this experience.
By once more proving that Here, Right Matters, Officer Dunn has been subjected to an all too familiar smear campaign that privileges personal aggrandizement and gross negligence above the need for justice and accountability in our democracy.
I have tried my best to offer words of support to anyone facing this dilemma. Your close circle is far more important than any background noise, no matter how heinous. "Focus on the good; don't let the bad get you down, and you'll be fine."usatoday.com/story/news/pol…
Russian “aggression stems, in part, from a systemic level of corruption, which places Putin’s Russia in an increasing state of tension with the Western order. 1/
… This system is a hierarchy, the “vertical of power,” wherein Putin manages patronage networks in government agencies, state-owned enterprises and private businesses. These elements govern together as an oligarchy with the authority and protection of law… 2/
As Russia’s state-sponsored oligarchy seeks to compete economically and politically with the West...it will be important for the Biden administration to establish whether the Kremlin has a strategy to apply corruption as a tool of statecraft… 3/
Earlier this year @ZelenskyyUa stressed that the current sanctions regime against Russia imposed by the US and EU is no longer working. Now, he and his team are leading by example, offering a framework that the US, UK, and EU can follow.
Ukraine’s comprehensive sanctions list on Russian individuals and entities has been renewed and expanded to include oligarchs, financial institutions, the defense sector, airlines, multimedia organizations, etc.
These individuals and entities are located in or operate on behalf of Russia and the occupied territories in the Donbas and Crimea. They have participated, directly or indirectly, in a comprehensive assault on Ukrainian democracy and territorial integrity.