DawsonSField Profile picture
Dec 12, 2021 23 tweets 10 min read Read on X
This is the most interesting thing I have seen in ages.

A secret DHS spy unit conducting surveillence of the media, Congress & NGOs.

One agent tried to blackmail Ali Watkins over her affair with James Wolfe, head of SSCI security...
#ButNothingsHappening
HT @LornaLe46125377
CBP Agent Jeffrey Rambo even implied to Watkins that he was with FBI & told her he was trying to recruit her as an FBI confidential human source.
There is a huge but as yet unreleased OIG report on the scandal.
Was this also an effort to flip Wolfe against SSCI?
Rambo was illegally using CBP & other government databases to vet these reporters.

Looks like Rambo or his unit ended up under FBI Counterintelligence investigation.
They then ran information in DOMEX a program that grabs content from people's electronic devices whne they cross the border. Seems like it would be illegal to access that for this.

I wonder if DHS's Charlie Ratliff also ran these numbers & emails through the FBI's FISA database?
They then started spying on members of Congress & their staffers, gathering information when they traveled abroud & passed through customs.
Rambo then tasked private intel contractors with Deloitte to spy upon Watkins & Wolfe...

Deloitte promptly spied on the Facebook accounts of Watkins & several family members...
Spying on reporters at Politico, Yahoo, Washington Post, New York Times, Wall Street Journal & others.
So these DHS agents identify reporters they want to 'recruit', then spy on them calling it vetting a potential source.
Then trying to blackmail those reporters covering national security cases.
What I find very interesting in relation to the #ButNothingsHappening cases is that the DHS agents were trying to identify the reporters sources involved in cases that connect to those investigations.

Were they hunting those sources to stop reporting on corruption cases?
I'm wondering if this is the government agency mentioned in the April 2017 FISA court ruling that had access to FBI FISA data but the court ruled it wasn't a violation as they were govt agents, but ruled they had access without training & compliance.
Rambo even had Deloitte target Reality Winner after she was arrested for stealing classified info from the NSA...
Rambo then passed on information to the FBI & believed that he had triggered an FBI leak investigation into Wolfe....
So FBI said they were opening an investigation, then told Rambo they were not, then in October of 2017 the investigation was back on again.

Wonder who at FBI was pushing it or blocking it...
Did Wolfe actually not leak to Watkins?

Is that why they got him for lying to FBI agents about his relationship with Watkins but no charges for leaking?
But it backfired because Watkins had Rambo's real name from the credit card he used when they met for drinks the first time.

So Rambo was named in a Washington Post article, but I don't recall seeing that story at the time.
Triggering Rambo's boss to say he didn't know about the meetings with Watkins & a DHS OIG investigation into the illegal spying!
Rambo & Ratliff were both referred to DOJ's Eastern District of Virginia for prosecution.
But in January EDVA decided to not prosecute based on the lack of DHS policies about what was authorized & not authorized.
People often wonder why these OIG investigations are important. It is because they identify when agencies have gaps in their procedures that allow 'crimes' to happen. OIG reports require closures of these loopholes to prevent or prosecute the next violation.
Rambo is apparently back on the job with CBP.
He is also running a coffee shop but is being targeted for his actions.
It is likely true that FBI would not have had a case against Wolfe were it not for Rambo illegally spying on Watkins.
But did Rambo send them after Watkins & Wolfe as a distraction from real leak investigations? Unknown.
Rambo's old boss is back that the CBP Counter Network Divison too.
Trying to ignore OIG's demands for new rules too...
Rambo is upset that journalists are investigating him & he no longer has access to databases to spy on them back.
Ironically, he may get fired for speaking to reporters about his case when DHS didn't fire him for spying on & likely attempting to blackmail reporters...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with DawsonSField

DawsonSField Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DawsonSField

Sep 26
For those of you who got duped into thinking the Comey indictment was about Trump.
This is the issue, McCabe’s false claim that Comey approved his leak about the Clinton cases.

The indictment says McCabe is telling the truth. OIG says McCabe lied 4 times!
oversight.gov/sites/default/…Image
This case was about McCabe obstructing the Clinton investigations. When WSJ published that Clinton Foundation board members funded his wife’s campaign he had his Special Counsel Lisa Page leak to claim he wasn‘t protecting the Clintons. Image
Image
Image
Image
McCabe & Page then tried to fight being recused from the Clinton cases. McCabe lied to the Attorney General & Comey trying to blame the leaks on NYFO FBI agents. Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 24 tweets
Sep 26
The indictment of Comey is up!

I hope the fake newsers enjoyed their 3 hours of celebration while it was sealed.

Because they are going to hate the next 2 years of this ‘case’.

Trump’s tweet is Exhibit 1! There was no investigation of Person 1!

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…Image
If Person 1 is Trump, then Comey isn’t guilty. Because he was asked about the ”Trump investigation” & there was no Trump investigation.
Person 3 would be James Baker.

But there is another possibility... Image
Image
Because Comey was asked about 2 investigations, the nonexistent Trump investigation & the Clinton investigation.
So Person 2 could be Hillary Clinton & Person 3 would be Andrew McCabe.

So it would be McCabe’s word against Comey’s word. Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
Sep 5
I wonder if Speaker Johnson was authorized to reveal this information?

It's the worst kept secret in the US government.

SO it's about time someone admits it live on TV!
If you are only learning today that Trump was an FBI asset who took down Epstein, that evidence has been available for years.

Wait until you figure out it was Swampy Republicans, not Democrats, who pushed the false claims about Trump raping one of Epstein's victims because she reminded him of his teenage daughter.

Read 22 tweets
Sep 5
I am going to break down the OIG report on FBI SAC of NYC Counterintelligence section & link it to other cases including #Spygate & the #RussiaHoax.
If you don't know yet, Trump & others were helping FBI hunt a Russian mole in FBI, Hillary told you a hoax.
oig.justice.gov/sites/default/…
This investigation began by at least 2010, when someone within FBI tipped the Russians off that FBI was tracking Russian illegal agents working in the US.

Why warn the Russians? The FBI & Russian spies were getting close to the Clintons & DNC fundraising.
While none of this is covered in the report, the FBI mole hunters at FBI started investigating to identify the new Russian spies being sent to NYC. But to find the mole, you need an asset borrowed from another agency that the FBI agents don't know.
Male-1 playing a consultant. Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 45 tweets
Aug 18
Bill Clinton is partially correct, “WE” forced Ukraine to give up its nukes in 1994.
The “WE” was Clinton & UK PM John Major.

But the Clintons sold out Ukraine and Europe to the Russians. It’s why ‘we’ disarmed Ukraine & allowed NATO to whither until Trump arrived in 2017.
Ukraine became defenseless. Then Clinton rigged the 1996 Russian election to ensure Yeltsin won. Later, Clinton & Blair would rig the 2000 election for Putin. Then Blair would rig the 2004 election for Putin.

Putin has always been part of Clinton’s ‘WE”.
That Swampy “WE” was at risk of being exposed by money laundering investigations tracking the billion dollars a day flying from NYC to Moscow.
Yeltsin & Clinton agree to have FBI Dir Freeh protect Gore & Putin’s 2000 election campaigns by shutting it down.
Read 44 tweets
May 30
If you are just learning about the Swamp creature named Leonard Leo & his control of ‘conservative’ judges who work for Fortune 500 multinational corporations instead of the American people; now is your chance to catch up.
#ButNothingsHappening
Leo’s friends then use your fake news to tell you that you should blindly support judicial rulings disguised as protecting the Constitution. When in reality, they are protecting Swampy relationships between corrupt companies & the politicians they own.
Why does your fake news want MAGA to support judges controlled by ’sleazeball’ Leonard Leo?

Because they believe that it’s very important that you support the judges who work for the Swamp.

How do they control them? Consulting fees, gifts & trips.

Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(