one would not need to sell in the market), and anyone shorting it hard post-tender should have their head examined (they should have shorted into the tender).
The data kinda looks like the account of Nomura Aya (daughter of activist Murakami-san) tendered some shares, but we won't know until Friday, or the next time his company City Index Elevens files.
Why?
Tender quantity was an odd-lot ending in x99 shares. And Nomura Aya held 2+%
of the company, ending in an odd-lot of x99 shares.
And the number of shares which traded ex-tender on 9th and 10th was 7+mm shares which shouldn't have been available if all the actives tendered, so they didn't, but SBI got 56.9mm shares which means either only 58% of actives
tendered and Murakami-san tendered everything OR it means Murakami tendered a bit and actives tendered most.
Back it all out and that is why I noted toys would get tossed from prams post-tender.
Obv we don't know for sure what the shapes look like, and they change a bit because of the index downweights the next few days (FTSE on Friday from 80.8% to 42.0% of 208.641mm shs (think MSCI will cut harder)).
But those were known contingent events.
Nobody is talking about the other ones.
And Shinsei is going to have to make an announcement about one of them in the next 2 weeks.
This pram has a rechargeable toy magazines.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For months now, most commentators on Evergrande have been displaying bearishness, clearly not expecting Evergrande would be able to make its coupon payments, and also quite clear since early summer the authorities would not bail out Chairman Hui and the company.
4mos ago the 13.75% 23s were in the mid-30s after dropping 40+ points the month after HKY was on the dais for CCP100.
It has been illiquid and effectively insolvent for months. A waiting game. The only thing Evergrande could do was sell assets and it didn't try hard enough.
And many commentators - in the media and otherwise - saw this clearly and cleanly 15mos ago (and some years before).
There is always a "what if" but the mantra from the PBOC for a year-plus now has been "we will not reflate using real estate" and the policy firehose to reduce
Just a note on this "Guangdong Govt Work Group" which is apparently being dispatched to Evergrande... at Evergrande's request... 👀
Evergrande is, simply put, two companies.
The offshore parent with the USD bonds (or most of them) made a filing at 8pm HKT.
There is a technicality on a repayment of an already overdue but extended bond guarantee (for US$260mm) and $82+mm of coupons due 6 Nov, with 30d grace period now DEFINITELY due Monday.
That OFFSHORE parent has some $20bn or so of debt it has to pay. The assets which underlie that debt are holdings in listed subs, some unlisted cos, some debt extended to affiliates, cash borrowed from affiliates, and 60% of the ONSHORE parent which runs the property developer.
It confirms the shutdown of the loophole which allowed Chinese business to list overseas without CSRC approval. It does not, for the moment, do anything to VIEs.
It is important to remember that VIEs like BABA may have "opaque" ownership structure, but that is not necessarily a defining characteristic.
The earliest Chinese companies listed on the NYSE like Sina and China Mobile were themselves VIEs.
Further, VIEs have recently listed in HK and this summer saw the mainland's first listing of a VIE ownership company (after the concept was first 'explicitly' endorsed in 2018 with the advent of China Depositary Receipts).
The 2024 Problem looms large. HKEX is gonna be busy.
Did anyone notice Evergrande Auto did a Friday night drop?
The language is a little imprecise but they 'gave back' undeveloped land to the govt, in return for cash, which was partially "confiscated" by the govt (to pay for other land, etc).
The language in the Chinese media is not dissimilar to the language used in describing how the Guangzhou Govt "took back" the land under the Guangzhou Stadium last week. Possible that Evergrande/Hengda gets an influx of some cash (the original stadium land price was RMB 6.8bn).
I assume the stadium and team are owned by Hengda (onshore) so any monies refunded would only be available onshore.
cc @discountinvestr@jackycwong