I’m going back and forth about this @TheAtlantic piece
It is SO difficult to read
As @jabarocas wrote - it insults & dismisses so many sacrifices made
But it also represents a hard truth of how millions of Americans view & have dealt w COVID
1/
theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
It is SO difficult to read
As @jabarocas wrote - it insults & dismisses so many sacrifices made
But it also represents a hard truth of how millions of Americans view & have dealt w COVID
1/
theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Should @TheAtlantic have published it?
It conveys what I consider deadly beliefs. But it’s so representative of the thinking of very many citizens that I also think it’s good for many people to read - to gain understanding of how people are thinking - regardless of the data
2/
It conveys what I consider deadly beliefs. But it’s so representative of the thinking of very many citizens that I also think it’s good for many people to read - to gain understanding of how people are thinking - regardless of the data
2/
So I’m really on the fence. Perhaps it should be published w a warning on top. But that is a very slippery slope of censorship and Reenforcing divisions and information bubbles on both sides
3/
3/
And to be clear - I don’t know how to say that one article should have a warning and another shouldn’t. There are multiple sides of any story and censorship would be a bad way to go.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
