Thread by @DempseyTwo

“Affidavits…it’s all about Affidavits.”

On October 16th 2020, a presentation was given by a member of a group called NH Voter Integrity. It was designed to introduce Canvassing training. Slide 5 tells us that the purpose was to get Affidavits. Why? For that, a wee thread🧵👇🏻

First, we are going to need to get on the same page as to some terms. There are no doubt better, more technical definitions to use but for our purposes, ‘Canvassing’ is going to door to door to speak with voters. These are door knockers who want to know who you’re voting for.

Notice I didn’t say they are asking who you *voted* for. That would be past tense, meaning after the election. Canvassers are usually exhausted and have raw knuckles *after* an election. But for our purposes, canvassing means going door to door talking to voters.

Again, I am sure there are more eloquent and legal ways of defining it, but for us an Affidavit is a written statement under oath. It is a document to be used in a court case. This is something the court relies upon for the record. It is what people claim the evidence will show.

Ok. You remember the Kraken right? Large mythical sea-creature that destroys everything he can seemingly get his tentacles around? No, not Steve Bannon, he is very very real👀.
I mean the lawsuits brought by Sidney Powell and them. 🐙

Yeah, yeah, the kraken suit that resulted in a Michigan judge ruling the lawyers who brought the case should be sanctioned and referred for disbarment. Here is that ruling. michigan.gov/documents/ag/1…

I bring this up because on page three of that ruling the judge says this:

Let’s focus on that for a minute.
‘Proffering claims not backed by evidence (but instead, speculation, conjecture and unwarranted suspicion.)’🤔

This means giving the court affidavits that do not also have evidence to support their claims. Remember the affidavit is what one would provide knowing they had evidence to support the claims made in it. The evidence should always further support the claim.

One of the main problems the kraken had was that Rudy or Sidney Powell didn’t have evidence of voter fraud. Rudy never alleged fraud in any court document or court room, he saved that for the bright, hair-melting lights of the news media’s cameras. TV. Person. Woman.

https://twitter.com/DempseyTwo/status/1329485207070773254

Just like in the public hearing, I imagine there were a lot of papers in front of Rudy and his fartner Jenna Ellis in courtrooms. Those could have been affidavits, for all we know they could have been printed mapquest directions to the Four Seasons Detroit Rock City Landscaping.

Let’s button our coats and go back to the ‘Shire. NH Voter Integrity group had a canvassing plan to go door to door and ask New Hampshire voters who they voted for. The plan for the canvassing as we have been told by slide 5 was All About the Affidavits.

This group was trying to get affidavits signed under oath, by trump voters to prove to the courts et al, there was election fraud. Get affidavits to be filed in courts in New Hampshire the same way it happened in Michigan which lead to the Antrim audit. detroitnews.com/story/news/pol…

Did you notice ASOG in there? It is now being reported there was a group of people meeting at Lin Wood’s place. Lin Wood is a lawyer whose name is on the kraken too. One of the people present at his house worked for that company, ASOG. It is run by Russell Ramsland (📌 1).

The association to Ramsland is an important one because Dominion Voting systems is suing Patrick Byrne. You’ll remember him from such things as being Rand Paul’s tech advisor/ Bitcoin evangelist, or [REDACTED] Maria Butina, or his Freedom Plaza speech Jan 5th.

Anyway, in that lawsuit, Dominion is making the allegation that after Byrne engaged Ramsland, Ramsland ‘set off to manufacture evidence to support the election fraud narrative.’

‘Manufacturing evidence’? Like say, through affidavits? Manufacturing affidavits to be presented to a court sounds bad. So bad that the lawyers who would do such a thing should probably be sanctioned and referred for disbarment. Oh, right! They were!! forbes.com/sites/alisondu…

Remember ASOG was in the house with Lin Wood working on a project of sorts. One of those there at the time submitted an Affidavit in support of the Kraken. His name is Seth Keshel. Why specifically is that important? Perhaps the answer is in NH. Or at least it was in November.

The morning of November 19th, the leader for NH Voter Integrity Group was being arraigned in court. Her group had an event the same evening. That event included guest speakers.

L to R, David Clement (📌 2)Seth Keshel and Ivan Raiklin.

Two of those three men are military. They appear in this reporting which contains references to psychological operations operatives working with Mike Flynn. One of whom is under investigation by the military, another provided ‘evidence’ to Sidney Powell. reuters.com/investigates/s…

Read that again. 👆🏻

We should take very seriously the fact that there is a training video on how to trick or treat for affidavits. If the canvassing scheme was somehow supported by these psyops veterans in an effort to support litigation in New Hampshire, we need to know that.

https://twitter.com/dempseytwo/status/1469653366171217925

We need to know, again who put them up to it and for what purpose. I suspect we will be seeing a lot more Affidavits with these names on them.

@maddow @MaddowBlog @JoyAnnReid @glennkirschner2 @ZevShalev @visionsurreal @BaddCompani @jennycohn1 @gal_suburban @January6thCmte

For those of you who have read this far, I thank you! I truly appreciate you dedicating the time to read and absorb all of this. I ask only a ton more now from you 😁, because if you saw the name @EverettStern1 in the article above, you’re going to want to read this.👇🏻

https://twitter.com/dempseytwo/status/1454823600683429890

(📌1) was about Russell Ramsland. See here for why that article said it was the Allied Security Operations Group. Are we sure it wasn’t Allied Special Operations Group?

https://twitter.com/dempseytwo/status/1441029780418277386

(📌2) was in reference to the third man in that photo from above. His presence offers me the excuse to show this again. Are we going to have to #ArrestMikeFlynn? Are these the kinds of things the @January6thCmte is poised to ask him about?
END

https://twitter.com/DempseyTwo/status/1439394333841625095

*21