Starting a new publication is exciting and terrifying all at once and all the time.
If you make this jump, there are a dozen different ways to look at your metrics that can make you feel great or terrible. You will manage to feel both ways simultaneously pretty much constantly. It's pretty stressful, to be honest.
That's why you'd better believe in what you're doing or it's not worth it. That's especially true when the interest waines a bit as you get further from launch and you hit the winter slow season. You have to be confident in order to make it through the hard points.
Thankfully, I'm very confident in the mission of producing sober, serious firearms reporting and analysis. The Reload has been successful in the short-term and I think it will be even more successful in the long-term. So much so that I put everything I have into it.
But, the whole experience of making a living off a new publication is not an easy one. That's for sure. Thank God for those who've been willing to support The Reload with subscriptions, advice, and even volunteer help. It definitely keeps me motivated.
Anyway, if you'd like to help too, we're having a sale right now. It's gone well so far. We've only got 8 slots left at 20% off. That's encouraging too! thereload.com/membership-sal…
Well, that was an incredible show of support. Thank you so much, everyone! We're extending our 20% off sale to anyone else who wants to help fund what we're doing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Gutowski

Stephen Gutowski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @StephenGutowski

7 Dec
When I teach a gun-safety course I tell my students that everyone is responsible for gun safety and they should speak up if they witness anyone doing anything unsafe, even me. There's no reason a set shouldn't operate the exact same way.
I can understand why an armorer wouldn't want an actor to mess with the loadout of a gun set up in a specific way for a scene, but Baldwin himself provides a reasonable alternative in his ABC interview: have the armorer show everyone the gun is safe. thereload.com/analysis-compl…
The scene setup itself was also dangerous and everyone watching should've noticed that. Guns being pointed at anyone should be avoided as much as possible even on a set. I don't see why it was necessary in this scene. thereload.com/analysis-compl…
Read 6 tweets
3 Dec
It's weird that Fox is making this horror movie into a competition cooking show, right?
I mean, what the hell is going on here?
This reminds me of the time Sony made a Jessie Eisenberg comedy out of a true story where criminals strapped a bomb to a pizza delivery guy and forced him to rob a bank before killing him.
Read 4 tweets
3 Dec
Baldwin's full explanation is that he pulled the hammer back and when he released it, the gun went off. That's very difficult to explain without the trigger being depressed. thereload.com/analysis-yes-a…
"I cock the gun. I go, ‘Can you see that? Can you see that? Can you see that?’” Baldwin told ABC. “And then I let go of the hammer of the gun, and the gun goes off."

He also claims he didn't pull the trigger.
There are two scenarios I can think of where that could happen, but both seem improbable. The first is is the hammer being pulled back far enough to set off a round but not far enough to catch a sear. That's a real hard sell.
Read 5 tweets
2 Dec
Most claims that a gun "went off" on its own can be dismissed out of hand. In Alec Baldwin's case, it's not quite that easy. thereload.com/analysis-yes-a…
Modern firearms, including many antique reproductions, include safety mechanisms that prevent a shot from being fired without the trigger being pulled. They make it so a gun can't go off on its own without some kind of defect in the gun.

However, not all replicas have these.
Police say Baldwin was using a modern replica of single-action revolver. Those are sold with or without a safety known as a transfer bar. Many prefer the traditional design without the safety, and it can be safe if handled properly. It's not clear which model Baldwin used.
Read 8 tweets
1 Dec
Apparently, I'm almost literally @finneas's #1 fan? Do I win some sort of prize for this?
You know, besides depression.
As a 30-something white guy from the suburbs who went to a Christian college, this all checks out.
Read 4 tweets
1 Dec
This is possible if the gun had some kind of serious mechanical issue. But, I'm highly skeptical about claims like this. It should be easy for police to tell if the gun in question could fire without the trigger being pulled.
It's true that very old single-action revolvers have more issues with accidental discharges. The gun used in this incident was a replica made by Pietta, according to police. Those guns should have transfer bars in them that address the safety issue.
The police should be able to determine pretty easily if the gun has a transfer bar or not. And how prone it would be to fire without the trigger being pulled when it's drawn from a holster.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(