What Ms Ranade calls “freebies” are in fact the opposite of “free = unearned”: they represent a “minimum” fraction of the wealth workers and farmers actually produce by their labour. My response to the anti Left tirade by @sonaliranadekavitakrishnan.substack.com/p/why-would-a-…
If we agree with Ms Ranade the Hindu majority was magnanimous enough to include Muslims & Christians in the idea of India, we imply it’s ok for Hindus to feel that in return for such magnanimity, the least Muslims & Christians can do is to avoid eating beef & converting Hindus.
Is it perhaps this shadow of Hindu supremacist ideology (the notion that India’s character as a nation & the rules for living in India are for the Hindu majority to decide) in secular liberal & left common sense that has helped land us where we are? bit.ly/3yv7D7k
Where, I wondered, did “the Left” display this ridicule for the religious Hindu? In the organising committees for Durga Puja celebrations in every para all over West Bengal which invariably had local CPIM cadres in enthusiastic and leading roles?! bit.ly/3yv7D7k
The claim that the Sangh won support coz of slights to religious Hindus by the Left is a Sanghi canard. Should liberals dissociate themselves from leftists to appease the Sangh on the prerogative of some Hindus to practice sati or untouchability? bit.ly/3yv7D7k
There is something wilfully “wooly-headed” in some liberals arguing in favour of humanism vs feminism and All Lives Matter vs Black Lives Matter (@dhruv_rathee); or attributing India’s character as a secular democracy to Hindu majoritarian magnanimity and virtue (@sonaliranade ).
To quote an old slogan: feminism is the radical idea that women are human. In order for all human lives to matter equally, one needs movements to assert that female, queer, Black, Dalit, Muslim lives matter as much as white, upper caste, male lives are seen to matter in our world
Hindu majoritarianism – – benign & magnanimous or discriminatory and violent – cannot be the basis of a moral society. Majoritarianisms (of white people in the US or Sunni Muslims in Afghanistan or Saudi Arabia, or Han Chinese in China) cannot be the basis of a moral society.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The age of marriage for all adults should be 18. If you’re old enough to choose a government, decide the country’s future you’re old enough to decide your own future; to marry or not. Support women’s autonomy, don’t force women to marry, don’t criminalise consensual relationships
Early pregnancies can be injurious to women’s health - the answer to that issue isn’t to criminalise adults who decide to marry. The answer is to ensure that women have the autonomy to decide if or when to marry, if or when to bear children.
For the BJP, health of young women is a mere pretext to criminalise women’s choice in love & marriage - something they are already doing through “anti conversion ordinances” & violent Sangh outfits that attack inter caste & inter faith couples.
@sonaliranade Here’s a point by point take down to all that’s wrong with your tweets: 1) Since 1920s some Hindus have demanded a Hindu SUPREMACIST nation in which others will be treated like Jews in Nazi Germany. No one has a RIGHT to such a nation.
+
@sonaliranade 2) Yet your question is pointless since Hindu supremacists have freely exercised the political freedom to demand a Hindu supremacist nation without any hurdles (barring the brief RSS ban). They have used parliamentary space to promote that agenda through hate speech with impunity
@sonaliranade 3) Just as whites don’t enjoy a right to a white supremacist nation, Hindus don’t have any entitlement to a Hindu supremacist nation. Likewise no one has a right to a Buddhist supremacist nation (like Myanmar) or an Islamist supremacist nation (Taliban in Afghanistan).
First they came with the NRC, and I thought, what’s the harm with just identifying the “infiltrators”?
Then they called the “infiltrators” termites - and I said, that’s not nice, they’re just illegal immigrants.
Next they began evicting the illegals and demolishing their homes, and I said, well the indigenous do need the land, but can’t you clear the settlements after the rains?
And then I saw with horror - my own brother dancing with such glee on that human chest with a neat red hole in it, saying “it’s great to kill termites”.
And I asked in shock, how and when did this happen? When did my own brothers become addicted to this drug of hate?
पहले वे आए NRC के बहाने और मुझे लगा घुसपैठी पहचानने में हर्ज क्या?
फिर उन्होंने कहा ये घुसपैठी तो “दीमक” हैं और मैंने सोचा, दीमक नहीं …पर घुसपैठी तो हैं न?
फिर मेरे ही भाई ने मरते हुए इंसान को “घुसपैठी दीमक” कहकर उसके छाती पर छलांग मार कर नाचा
- और मैंने पूछा - अरे ये सब कब और कैसे हुआ? मेरा सुंदर देश और मेरे ही भाई बहन कब हिटलरशाही नशा करने लगे? कब से इंसानों को दीमक मानने लगे?
… जवाब मेरे ही दिल ने मुझे दिया: ये सब तुम्हारे ही तो आँखों के सामने होता रहा.
तुम्हारे कानों ने सुना, आँखों ने देखा - पर खुद को तसल्ली देते रहे कि नागरिकों में से “घुसपैठी” चुनने के ख़तरनाक खेल को हम शांति से खेल लेंगे, समाज के इस समुद्र मंथन से कोई विष पैदा नहीं होगा, और होगा तो हमारे अपने इसमें धुत नहीं होंगे.
On the 4th anniv of the assassination of #GauriLankesh: a thread to remind us of the Hindu-supremacist terrorists who trained, armed & instigated her killers - and the fact that the same terrorists are targeting many of us today. Read where the case stands thenewsminute.com/article/gauri-…
Hindu-supremacist outfit @SanatanSanstha is named by SIT as responsible for the assassination of not only Gauri but activists and writers Dabholkar and Pansare, & academic Prof Kalburgi. All were targeted for writing against “Hindutva” - Hindu-supremacist ideology & politics.
Sanatan Sanstha, linked with a 2009 blast in Goa, shares its Goa HQ with @HinduJagrutiOrg . Both together organise a yearly All India Hindu Convention explicitly calling to turn secular India into a Hindu Nation in which minorities will be 2nd class citizens.
Dear @PreetiChoudhry the guy who just spoke on your show as a "riot victim" has himself admitted that men in a video with guns in their hands were "his boys"
. @SreenivasanJain had investigated riot videos from Brahmpuri and Pandit Shankar Lal Gautam had admitted it was "his boys" in this video, with the laughable claim that they were carrying "water pistols" to protect Hindus from Muslims!
The list of the dead provided by @DelhiPolice in an annexure to the affidavit submitted to the Delhi high court on July 13 establishes that 77% of the civilians killed – 40 out of 52 – were Muslim while the remaining 23%, or 12, were Hindu. Just a reminder