"ACLU deputy director for transgender justice Chase Strangio said that intervention by child welfare services in LGBT+ families was “another axis upon which to be concerned about the state coming in and deciding what makes a legitimate parent”.
This is an important point isn't it? Does the state 'know best' when a child wishes to become transgender, or is it the parents job to advocate for their child's welfare? Odd how parents being kept out of the loop is applauded by some if parents resist transition.
Ought we not to be focused on one thing and one thing only - the child's welfare? And operate from a rebuttable presumption that the best and most consistent advocates for their children are likely to be their parents?
But recognise that not all parents are able to focus on their child's welfare. And for the State to take proper action to protect children when significant harm is proved or likely to occur without intervention.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Mr Miller’s challenge is centred ... on the requirement of perception- based recording, and in particular, the requirement in Section 6.3 that a hate incident ... must be recorded as such “irrespective of whether there is any evidence to identify the hate element”.
Para 34 "The topic on which Mr Miller was tweeting and its broader implications are plainly important matters of public interest on which strong views are held and publicly expressed"
No that we are allowed to discuss this a little more freely, it’s very interesting to see the themes that have raged on my timeline for two days now, all stemming from a comment that a female victim of rape ought to be allowed a single sex space for counselling.
1. Trans people are the most marginalised and oppressed group. Even if no trans person has been murdered in the last 2 years and most recent quarter statistics for hate crime shows decrease.
But any data that shows no murders or declining rates of hate crime is dismissed as ‘inaccurate’ or because murder victims were actually trans but had no friends or family willing to state this.
A very odd response. Some legal actions succeed. Some fail. I will donate to whatever I like because #lawfare seems to be our only reliable option here.
I am well aware the challenge to the EHRC failed, alongside challenge to prison policy. But Maya Forstater won. @fairplaywomen won. Kate Scottow won. The Court of Appeal currently deciding on #FairCopAppeal.
I did! Like the introduction - 'you could be forgiven for thinking that all it campaigns about is trans rights' Formed as lobby group in 1989, devasted by infamous section 28 that banned 'promotion' of homosexuality. Stonewall fought for its appeal and equality for gay people.
now it has begun to campaign on trans rights, gaining both praise and 'strong' criticism for is stance on gender identity. It runs 'work place inclusion schemes' covering 25% of workforce, more than 250 are public bodies. Some have left - the BBC, Ofcom, Channel 4 and the EHRC.
Asked NK why she wanted to do the job - as a lesbian my life absolutely transformed by work of Stonewall. Married and adopted two children, illegal until recently. An amazing opportunity to make things better for LGBTQ+ people.
I am not sure which is more concerning. An official police force social media account blithering on about being your ‘true self’ - or one that blocks members of the public who disagree with them.
Which is my ‘true self’? The one who stays up too late, eating smarties and watching poor quality serial killer documentaries? How useful would the is ‘self’ be at work I wonder? Or is it the self that engages in pointless arguments with anonymous people?
Well, at least at work I know who they are so there is that. People’s ‘true self’ is not required in the workplace. You are there to meet the expectations set out in your contract of employment or set by your regulator. If your ‘true self’ conflicts with those, you are out.