1 Timothy is to Ephesus. Note 2:8-11, Paul uses plurals men (v.8) & women (vv.9-10), switches to the singular (woman) in v.11, suggesting he may be refer to a specific case. Unlike English, Greek doesn’t need a definite article to be definite, so it can read “the woman.” 1/15
The Greek words for woman & man here can mean "wife" & "husband" depending on the context. The word for “exercise authority” in v. 12 is αὐθεντεῖν, which, then meant “bully," "domineer." It’s not the usual word for "authority over" (see 1 Cor 6:12; 7:4; note Luke 22:25f). 2/15
Now, “to teach” … Paul began his letter w/ concerns about people teaching strange doctrines or “heterodoxy” (1:3). He’ll use this word again in 6:3. He also mentions “doctrines of demons” in 4:1. So it’s possible Paul is referring to false teachings in 2:12. 3/15
That possibility is strengthened w/ v.14, in which Paul uses the example of the serpent deceiving the woman in Gen3. Being “deceived” (exapatao) implies something false, not true (2 Cor 11:3-4; Rom 16:17-18). So, it’s probable the young wife is teaching false doctrine. 4/15
The probability is strengthened further w/ 5:13-15 about young women going house to house, saying improper things (v.13) & following Satan (v.15). Considering Priscilla instructed Apollos w/ doctrine in Acts18:26 (in Ephesus) it’s highly likely Paul refers to false teaching. 5/15
Note the word “busybodies” (periergos) in v. 13. It’s only used twice in the NT. The other place is Acts 19:19 referring to those who practiced magic. In Acts 19, Paul is in Ephesus. One word, used only twice, both in Ephesus. 6/15
In Acts 19, Paul is confronting evil spirits (vv. 12-16) and converting those practicing “magic.” Paul’s conversions were hurting the business of those who made silver shrines to the goddess Artemis (vv. 24-25). Ephesus was THE city of Artemis, with a major shrine to her. 7/15
Artemis was the goddess of fertility, chastity, the hunt, young women (note 1 Timothy 5:11-15), and childbirth. IMPORTANT: Young women worshipped Artemis, seeking her protection through the dangers of childbirth. 8/15
Back to 1 Timothy 2, “the wife” shouldn’t bully or teach false doctrine to “the husband.” “But she [singular] will be preserved through childbirth if they [plural] continue in faith …” IMPORTANT: “she” & “they.” Who is she, and who is they? 9/15
“She” is the young wife, and “they” is the young wife AND her husband from v. 12. “Preserved through childbirth” … See Artemis of Ephesus, goddess of young women and preservation through childbirth back above. 10/15
Here’s what's going on: A young Christian wife is pregnant & understandably fears the dangers of childbirth. In her fear, she begins to worship Artemis for preservation & begins to bully her husband w/ false teachings so that he will join her - again for her preservation. 11/15
Note how Paul addresses the problem: A wife being deceived, encouraging her husband to do wrong, dangers of childbirth … So, of course, Paul picks Genesis 3:1-4:1 – note especially 3:16 & 4:1 about dangers in childbirth and being helped thru it by God. 12/15
Paul doesn’t condemn the young woman – he has compassion. He understands the fear and danger involved. He says she shouldn’t bully or teach false doctrines to her husband, adding the wife will be preserved thru childbirth if the wife & husband both continue in the faith. 13/15
Paul understands the real world dynamics in play. He stops the sinning but wants to heal the breach between this couple, encouraging the wife that God will protect her if the couple continue in the Faith. 14/15
This is the best explanation. It conforms to all of the letter & Acts 19. It explains why women instruct men on doctrine elsewhere in the bible. The passage coheres better, particularly grammatical numbers. And it thoroughly explains the curious “saved thru childbirth” 15/15.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nicolas Gold

Nicolas Gold Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NicolasGold1

22 Jun
Interesting thought. Malachi was written around the time of Ezra-Neh. The latter is anti-climactic, legalistic, covenant-thwarting, & ineffective. Based on Torah commitment, Ezra commands the Jews to divorce their pagan wives & send away kids (Ezra 10). Mal 2 says God hates this.
Ezra-Neh is a post-Exilic reaction to the errors that led to Exile, but the ancient Jews were fulfilling Torah in the wrong spirit, which was oppressing women, children, & foreigners. They were making the same mistakes of the pre-Exilic Israelites but from the opposite direction.
This supports my reading of Paul (and Jesus) that many ancient Jews had turned Torah into an idol, which necessarily (as with all idolatry) led to oppression.
Read 4 tweets
21 Jan
The book of Job teaches that not all those who suffer are either punished or abandoned by God. Jesus taught on this subject (John 9:2; Luke 13:1-6) in his lead up to the cross. In Luke 13, when commenting upon Pilate’s evil, he warns about what could happen to the entire nation.
In Jesus’ prophetic work, he called Israel to abandon its ethnocentric violence. He saw Israel’s revolutionary approach towards Rome leading to destruction. In one way, his crucifixion was an enacted parable, representing Rome’s eventual destruction of ancient Israel.
Jesus says as much in Luke 23:28-31, quoting the Hosea 10:8 prediction of the Israel’s destruction by Assyria (v. 30; see also Rev 6:16) and basically saying, “If they do this to one who is innocent (Luke 23:4, 14, 22, 47), what will they do to the truly guilty?” (v. 31).
Read 25 tweets
23 Dec 20
Have any of the figures associated with CBN or the Founders raised a cry about ESS, or any way close to the prophetic doom they herald about CRT and women preachers? 1/4
I'm not suggesting they go after Bruce Ware (they shouldn't!). For 1,700 yrs, Christianity said doctrines about God's nature are of highest importance for which councils, creeds, & excommunications are necessary. But the self-appointed defenders of orthodoxy have no interest. 2/4
My point is that these "defenders" are not behaving in ways that Christians have always said defenders of orthodoxy should react when faced with matter such as ESS. Why is that? 3/4
Read 4 tweets
18 Dec 20
As expressed in Rom 13, government is a power created by God to fight, punish, & hold back evil, particularly thru violence (though not to defeat it). Government executes vengeance b/c it receives that authority from God (Rom 12:19; Heb 10:30; Deut 32:35). 1/12 Image
Initially, God did not want Israel to have a king (1 Sam 8:7). He was to be the king over Israel while the other nations had their gods (Deut 32:8 LXX, DSS). But sin and Israel's accompanying desire to be like other nations brought this about. 2/12 Image
In permitting a king, God warned Israel of the corruption & oppression that would follow (1 Sam 8:11-18). Noting a king would be Israel's choice (Deut 17:15; 28:36), God set rules to limit the power of the king to oppress (17:14-20). 3/12 ImageImage
Read 12 tweets
16 Dec 20
"['The world' (cosmos)] refers to the order of society and indicates that evil has a social and political character beyond the isolated actions of individuals." Order (cosmos) "that which is assembled together well." Image
"Evil exists in the society outside the individual and exerts an influence upon him or her." ImageImage
Mott (1982) explaining the Hellenistic view of power, "Abstract power without a concrete attachment was inconceivable." This is close to the view of Wink (1984) who popularized the view that spiritual Powers have a physical basis. 1/2 Image
Read 59 tweets
28 Sep 20
Image
McAlpine notes Berkhof argued the weapon the Powers wield is ideological: claims to legitimacy. After self-proclaimed guardians of truth/justice crucified God, false claims were exposed. I've yet to find this argument fully satisfactory, though it points in the right direction.
Wink delves into the above significantly, noting Étienne de la Boetie in his Discourse on Voluntary Servitude. The latter argued tyrants have power b/c the people give it to them. I de-flesh that out a bit myself for how idolatrous Powers enslave humans in *part*.
Read 30 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(