“Since the goal is to erase the concept of masculine virtues, the new bargain the introduction of women into combat represents isn’t to have women join equally or even seriously in the fighting and dying.”
I read responses to this saying it was staged and he’s still alive because the women are trying to win an argument and texting after he shoots the guy. They don’t lose their composure.
No, it’s real. The guy is dead. That’s the casual disregard they had for both these men.
"Ms Andersson was elected as prime minister earlier on Wednesday because under Swedish law, she only needed a majority of MPs not to vote against her."
"Of the 349 members of the Riksdag, 174 voted against her. But on top of the 117 MPs who backed Ms Andersson, a further 57 abstained, giving her victory by a single vote."
When you place women in creative control of a franchise you get an obsessive focus on "character development." Plot is just a vehicle for explaining characters.
Men are interested in things. Women are interested in people. When women do the storytelling the characters are the reason for the story. Events, environments, circumstance, story arch, are ancillary to understanding the characters.
Look at any series written, directed or produced by women and you'll see the obsessive need to explain a character's past by going back in time to understand why they're doing what they do in the now.